Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you followed the entire thread you would see that I said that AFTER Joe Biden fired Shokin for investigating Burisma Lutsenko stopped all investigations of Burisma.Now even you call you a liar. Earlier, you said, "Burisma was NEVER investigated."
And that's bullshit, which is why you can't prove it. You have no proof Burisma was ever being actively investigated by Shokin. Even Shokin has indicated that. And Shokin's replacement did go after Burisma and won a conviction against Zlochevsky on taxes, securing a $7½ million fine. And guess what? Hunter didn't lose his job when that happened.
Yes, Shokin said, "but I refused to close this investigation." That was true. What's also true was despite there being an open investigation, Shokin wasn't actively pursuing it. He was protecting Zlochevsky, not investigating him. Even the UK opened their own investigation into Zlochevsky. They had to shut it down after nearly a year of Shokin refusing to cooperate with them.
There are several possible Articles of Impeachment:So the entire premise of the thread is that you’re ready to start impeachment. Apparently that’s not the case since you can’t even identify what he’s being impeached for.
I have little doubt that you’ll never admit you’re wrong. If Biden isn’t impeached, you’ll make an excuse to avoid admitting your error just like you make excuses about the DoJ “covering” for him, a totally baseless accusation.
Well, when he's not impeached (prior to 2024 election anyway) what are you going to do...keep voting for GOP incumbents...right. Why?That's not even considering the money the House is tracking like from Romania.
If Hunter is worth about $230,000,000 there was a lot of bank transfers and laundered money to track.
I'm NOT going to explain this to you for the millionth fucking time.The FEC never said it was ok. And that's the same FEC which wouldn't go after Trump over hush money to a porn star because they felt prosecuting Cohen for it was sufficient enough and that they had better things to do.
A campaign contribution is anything of value to a campaign. Making your opponent appear involved in potentially illegal activity by opening an investigation is something of value. Hence, a campaign contribution.
The FBI covered up Hunter's laptop.“We know that Hillary is guilty, and we’re going to keep investigating her until we prove it”.
All of this “evidence” was in the hands of the DOJ, the Treasury Department, and the IRS throughout the entire time that Donald Trump was President. Hunter Biden had to clean up all of his tax filings and pay both the taxes owing and fines/penalties involved in the late filings.
It would’ve been very very foolish of Hunter Biden to lie about his finances, while the IRS was all up his ass, and the Trump Administration looking for an excuse to prosecute him.
The bald fact is that you’ve had six years of investigating all things Hunter Biden and you still don’t have a shred of evidence that any of his business dealings were illegal.
Or that Joe Biden had any part in any of his son’s business dealings.
What did the FEC rule?Which is something of value to Trump's campaign.
Hunter sold access to Joe.Again, you're attributing money to Joe that actually went to Hunter. And guessing things like, "for sale?" is nothing but your imagination manufacturing a scandal. Nothing you posted indicates Joe Biden was paid to influence anything.
Yep. Democrats are criminals.Well, when he's not impeached (prior to 2024 election anyway) what are you going to do...keep voting for GOP incumbents...right. Why?
Lame.Yep. Democrats are criminals.
Hunter sold access to Joe.
Joe earned the money or they wouldn't have paid millions for access.
I agree that there is no "smoking gun" yet. There is no direct evidence. But there is tons of smoke.
The House needs to keep digging until they find proof.
Here's hoping they tie money to "the big guy".
If you followed the entire thread you would see that I said that AFTER Joe Biden fired Shokin for investigating Burisma Lutsenko stopped all investigations of Burisma.
Senile Joe protected Hunter's cash cow (no show job) at about $80,000 a month.
I'm NOT going to explain this to you for the millionth fucking time.
Trump can pay hush money to anyone with his own money. NOT A CRIME PER THE FEC.
IF Mr. Pecker or Mr. Cohen pay hush money THAT IS A CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION. Pecker got fined Cohen got fucked.
The FBI covered up Hunter's laptop.
The FBI paid Twitter and FB to censor the laptop story
The FBI & CIA promoted the bogus memo calling Hunter's laptop "Russian Disinformation". It is real.
Mr. Bobulinsky and many photos as well as WH records show Joe Biden was bought and paid for.
www.factcheck.org
What did the FEC rule?
There was a legal disagreement. The USSC would have made the call if the dems were serious, they were not.
The impeachment was just political theatrics that the senate saw thru.
There are several possible Articles of Impeachment:
Biden let the Chinese spy balloon fly all across the US, even over highly classified sites.
Biden sold SPR oil to China via Hunter's oil subsidiary
Biden's war on US oil means that China supplies the batteries we need
Biden's abandonment of $85b of US military equipment in AFG means that China can reverse engineer everything
Biden's banked $3.5m from the Moscow mayor's wife
Biden's banked $1.5b that China gave Hunter to "invest"
Biden's scored Chinese diamonds
Hunter sold paintings to anonymous buyers for $$$$$$$$$ (emoluments?)
Biden stole classified documents that he could NOT declassify. For sale???
That's not even considering the money the House is tracking like from Romania.
If Hunter is worth about $230,000,000 there was a lot of bank transfers and laundered money to track.
You do know that Elon Musk proved that the FBI censored Hunter's laptop, and that the CIA promoted that bullshit "Russian Disinformation" memo that probably cost Trump the 2020 election. Hunter's laptop is real, the FBI covered it up, QED.
The game isn't over till its over, duh.I agree that there is no "smoking gun" yet. There is no direct evidence.
You're done.
Pecker paid a fine. If it was a crime he would have been indicted, duh. You do not know campaign finance law as well as the FEC.The FEC never said it wasn't a crime. They said they weren't going after him because they has other matters to work on and that they were satisfied with Cohen getting convicted for it.
And Trump conspired with Cohen to commit those crimes.
I believe the files that Elon Musk released not the cover story.Stamos said “law enforcement has the ability to get stored communications from companies like Twitter under 18 USC 2703(d),” which usually requires authorization from a judge. The FBI might request such information as part of an investigation. He also said that “companies can demand reimbursement” under the federal regulation that says the government shall pay the entity fulfilling the records request.
“This is absolutely nothing to do with content moderation,” wrote Stamos, who is now director of the Stanford Internet Observatory at the university’s Cyber Policy Center.
Exactly. Not campaign related as claimed by democrats. The impeachment was total bullshit.They "ruled" Trump and Giuliani's requests for Zelensky to open an investigation into Biden was an official act of the government which they have no jurisdiction over.
1. Trump was not removed. The End.There was no legal disagreement. The government office of accountability issued the legal opinion. Neither Trump administration nor the OMB filed any legal dispute of their opinion. If the OMB wanted to dispute that opinion, why didn’t THEY file suit? Nobody six in opinion, unless someone legally disputes it. This is like saying the courts didn’t look at the evidence of election fraud. That’s because the Trump campaign didn’t present evidence of election fraud for them to look at.
Why do you keep re-posting the claim that has been debunked multiple times that Hunter Biden is worth $230 million.
Letting the spot Chinese spy balloon fly over is not illegal and that was Don on the advice of the Pentagon.
Elon musk proved that the Biden campaign ordered the Hunter Biden dick pics removed. That was the only “censorship”.
Nothing that Joe Biden has done is illegal improper, or would come under the heading of high crimes and misdemeanours.
Joe Biden cannot be impeached for anything that Hunter Biden has done.
Your whole impeachment, agendas lies, conspiracy, theories, and bullshit that Republicans are making up about Hunter Biden.
