- Oct 31, 2012
- 54,984
- 54,499
- 3,605
- Thread starter
- #101
Uh-huh, well except for all the times President Nimrods EO's were challenged in court.....Let me rephrase, the courts had no thought to stop him.EO's are only bad when Trump signs them. like his immigration EO that restricted travel from certain Islamic countries, something Obama also did and no one said anything about it.
.
You're joking, right?
The courts don't originate the law suits; Trump just needs get better at writing them and remove the language that gives his opponents the opening to block his EO's on Constitutional grounds.With Trump though, he's a meany and orange so he must be stopped I reckon.
Apparatchiks from both of the major political crime families bitch and moan when a President from the "other team" issues EO's while remaining silent while one of their own does the same thing, apparently some don't realize that partisan politics is often a game of "what is good for the goose is good for the gander" one-upmanship.
Writing EO's is one thing, but writing them that counter US federal law like Obama did is another.
No one stopped Obama, but they sure and stopped Trump.
Look on the bright side. We now have a media that is intently scrutinizing and criticizing EVERYTHING Trump does. I much prefer this to a media that was on it's knees blowing Obama every day. Don't you?
They are useless either way.