- Oct 26, 2011
- 16,749
- 1,340
- 85
The logical response for Iran would be to insist Israel remove its nuclear arsenal for Iran to not build one for itself - and a complete nuclear disarmament would be a safer middle east for everyone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The logical response for Iran would be to insist Israel remove its nuclear arsenal for Iran to not build one for itself - and a complete nuclear disarmament would be a safer middle east for everyone.
It's funny. I recall back in 2006 through 2008 arguing about Iran and their nuclear program with lefties. They denied as best they could, even with facts about the process of enrichment given to them AND explained to them, that Iran would never use enriched U for a weapon. In this age, there are no longer any real uses for enriched U EXCEPT for weapons.Nuclear Inspectors Say Their Mission to Iran Has Failed
Like no one could EVER see that coming.
Here's my shocked face...
We dicked around in Libya when we KNEW this was inevitable.
Totally agree. Add EGYPT to your point also.
Should we wait? Why? Hit the nuke sites and destabilize the regime we can work with the pro-American opposition there, Iran is working feverishly to get Nukes why is that? Better now than late,r but its an election year, Obama wont do it, He probably wouldnt do it regardless
It's funny. I recall back in 2006 through 2008 arguing about Iran and their nuclear program with lefties. They denied as best they could, even with facts about the process of enrichment given to them AND explained to them, that Iran would never use enriched U for a weapon. In this age, there are no longer any real uses for enriched U EXCEPT for weapons.Nuclear Inspectors Say Their Mission to Iran Has Failed
Like no one could EVER see that coming.
Here's my shocked face...
We dicked around in Libya when we KNEW this was inevitable.
Totally agree. Add EGYPT to your point also.
They are probably STILL in denial.
The logical response for Iran would be to insist Israel remove its nuclear arsenal for Iran to not build one for itself - and a complete nuclear disarmament would be a safer middle east for everyone.
I'd say those on the right who have a more libertarian bent definitely are. That's where I differ greatly from them. We MUST be involved in these sorts of foreign situations.It's funny. I recall back in 2006 through 2008 arguing about Iran and their nuclear program with lefties. They denied as best they could, even with facts about the process of enrichment given to them AND explained to them, that Iran would never use enriched U for a weapon. In this age, there are no longer any real uses for enriched U EXCEPT for weapons.Totally agree. Add EGYPT to your point also.
They are probably STILL in denial.
A lot of so-called conservatives are,too.
I love libertarian ideals in almost every other aspect (almost), but when it comes to foreign affairs, I am total Neocon.Me,too,moto.....totally agree.
Libya?How many unnecessary wars in the Middle East will it take to convince some of you that we ought to stop doing that?
....and liquidate its fake, illegitimate regime of thugs and murderers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/w...pectors-wont-visit-nuclear-sites.html?_r=2&hp
Nuclear Inspectors Say Their Mission to Iran Has Failed
"International nuclear inspectors reported Tuesday evening that their mission to Iran had failed, with Tehran blocking their access to a site the inspectors believe could have been used for tests on how to produce a nuclear weapon, and refusing to agree to a process for resolving questions about other possible military dimensions to its nuclear program."
================================================
It is obvious to all those with a brain (except our very own fake president, obama) that diplomacy is completely pointless at this time.
Only a military option can be used, and the termination of this awful, tyrannical regime of terrorists is required.
Libya?How many unnecessary wars in the Middle East will it take to convince some of you that we ought to stop doing that?
I mean, really?
So, that covers your comment about unnecessary wars.
But, we're talking about necessary wars.
Maybe you'd like to start a thread of your own on those unnecessary ones.
Libya?How many unnecessary wars in the Middle East will it take to convince some of you that we ought to stop doing that?
I mean, really?
So, that covers your comment about unnecessary wars.
But, we're talking about necessary wars.
Maybe you'd like to start a thread of your own on those unnecessary ones.
Let us know when you have an analogy to discuss.Libya?How many unnecessary wars in the Middle East will it take to convince some of you that we ought to stop doing that?
I mean, really?
So, that covers your comment about unnecessary wars.
But, we're talking about necessary wars.
Maybe you'd like to start a thread of your own on those unnecessary ones.
I opposed the Libya intervention.
You're an idiot. Did we need to go to war with the Soviets? They got nukes 60 years ago.