Thought experiment : Two different countries.

[CultureCitizen]

How would this two countries would be different?
Imagine two countries with 1,000 inhabitants, They both have a GDP per capita of 50,000.
But in country A 10 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.
While in country B 800 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.

Would these two countries be equally developed ?
Would there be any social concequence because of that small difference ?
Which would by more unstable (both from an economic an social point of view ?).

 

[David_42]

Country A would be a plutocracy. Country B would be a balanced country without massive amounts of corruption.

 

[Two Thumbs]

B would have 200 people that are suffering immensely b/c they can't afford what the rest of the country can.

the other would be America, the greatest nation in the history of earth.

Just looking at what you have accomplished should shut you leftist piles of shit up.

but this is a thought question, so yall are disqualified.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How would this two countries would be different?
Imagine two countries with 1,000 inhabitants, They both have a GDP per capita of 50,000.
But in country A 10 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.
While in country B 800 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.

Would these two countries be equally developed ?
Would there be any social concequence because of that small difference ?
Which would by more unstable (both from an economic an social point of view ?).

too stupid!!! if you oppose inequality why to you support liberal taxes, unions, and deficits, the liberal war on the family and schools, and the welfare nanny entitlement state???

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

.
But in country A 10 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.

of course it would be impossible under capitalism since Steve Jobs would not acquire 20 billion and but it in his mattress, instead he would bank it where it would be loaned out and circulated throughout the population for school car home business loans etc.

 

[CultureCitizen]

.
But in country A 10 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.

of course it would be impossible under capitalism since Steve Jobs would not acquire 20 billion and but it in his mattress, instead he would bank it where it would be loaned out and circulated throughout the population for school car home business loans etc.

Well country-wise ... it could happen : he could invest it in Chinese stocks / companies, for example.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

.
But in country A 10 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.

of course it would be impossible under capitalism since Steve Jobs would not acquire 20 billion and but it in his mattress, instead he would bank it where it would be loaned out and circulated throughout the population for school car home business loans etc.

Well country-wise ... it could happen : he could invest it in Chinese stocks / companies, for example.

dear, if he invests his dollars in China then someone in China will have to invest them here. Econ 101. Why always look stupid?? Does the lib Nazi want a law preventing Americans from investing outside of America??

 

[Two Thumbs]

.
But in country A 10 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.

of course it would be impossible under capitalism since Steve Jobs would not acquire 20 billion and but it in his mattress, instead he would bank it where it would be loaned out and circulated throughout the population for school car home business loans etc.

Well country-wise ... it could happen : he could invest it in Chinese stocks / companies, for example.

dear, if he invests his dollars in China then someone in China will have to invest them here. Econ 101. Why always look stupid?? Does the lib Nazi want a law preventing Americans from investing outside of America??

all leftist support tyranny.

So any rule or law that sticks it to freedom is cheered

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

.
But in country A 10 persons hold 90 percent of the wealth.

of course it would be impossible under capitalism since Steve Jobs would not acquire 20 billion and but it in his mattress, instead he would bank it where it would be loaned out and circulated throughout the population for school car home business loans etc.

Well country-wise ... it could happen : he could invest it in Chinese stocks / companies, for example.

dear, if he invests his dollars in China then someone in China will have to invest them here. Econ 101. Why always look stupid?? Does the lib Nazi want a law preventing Americans from investing outside of America??

all leftist support tyranny.

So any rule or law that sticks it to freedom is cheered

yes, when a lib Nazi like cutlturecreep supports one lib Nazi intervention he should be required to list all 2500 libNazi interventions he wants and admit that he's a Libnazi.