This Is Why You Allow Armed Teachers

[Oddball]

View attachment 235352

Whiny BS.

Fact.

 

[Clementine]

The Coward of Broward, the cop who refused to make any attempt to protect the students at Parkland as a shooter was killing them, has offered his defense in a civil lawsuit by one of the parents. His lawyer is claiming that the state has no duty to protect citizens. It only has a duty to protect itself. Judges across the country are agreeing with this in many cases.

This is the exact opposite of what the left is trying to tell us. They would have us believe that a huge, powerful government will do everything for us. Provide housing, food, healthcare AND protect us from criminals after we surrender our weapons.

It's clear that our own security lies in our own hands, yet the leftists have a strong desire to take away our ability to do that. Considering that cops do not have to take steps to protect us when we are in danger, they need to quit with the gun ban talk and let us do what we need to do in order to survive.

It's no secret that the left is more concerned about banning guns for their own protection. People will fight against tyranny. The leftists could care less how many people die and they merely use these mass shootings as a tool to protect themselves so they can enact their radical agenda.

Same is true with healthcare. They claim they will help everyone but what always happens is that fewer people survive because of the doled out care. Most don't get good care. And those who do get it won't be allowed to have the best care.

Government looks out for government. In the case of guns, it's all about preventing people from forming militias and fighting against tyranny.

If cops, whose motto has always been "To Serve and Protect" do not have to do either, then why would we hand over our weapons and trust the state to keep us safe.

Bottom line is that we can't. And if the left has their way, we will be unable to protect ourselves.

Parkland School Cop Claims He Had 'No Legal Duty' to Protect Kids During the Shooting

 

[Unkotare]

View attachment 235352

Whiny BS.

Fact.

Insecurity

 

[BULLDOG]

Cops and schools had no duty to shield students in Parkland shooting, says judge who tossed lawsuit.

Another school district agrees:

Ohio school district votes to allow armed staff members.

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

Why were you talking to elementary school teachers?

What about the schools in my area where every teacher almost without exception is an avid hunter, females included?

Pointing a gun at Bambi from a deer stand is not the same as being effective in a combat area. You don't see the difference?

 

[Asclepias]

Cops and schools had no duty to shield students in Parkland shooting, says judge who tossed lawsuit.

Another school district agrees:

Ohio school district votes to allow armed staff members.

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

Why were you talking to elementary school teachers?

What about the schools in my area where every teacher almost without exception is an avid hunter, females included?

The only place I would support having teachers armed is in places where people still hunt for their food. They (the children and teachers) are used to guns and carry them around in their pickups daily.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Judge Bloom should hang her head in abject shame. Protecting people is not only the duty of the police, it is their number one reason for existence.

I support "School Resource Officer" programs, such as the one at Great Mills High School in St. Mary's County (an exurb of Washington DC) which puts one LEO in each high school, plus two additional ones to split between the county's middle schools. Earlier this year, one of the SRO's - who also happens to be a SWAT team member - sprinted toward gunfire and exchanged fire with the shooter, who became the only casualty after he shot himself in response. That's how to protect kids, not to whimper in safety as shots ring out, only to later cower behind a nitwit judge's inane ruling.

If I could, I'd put SRO programs in every county. Here, read all about it:
5 things to know about Md. SRO Blaine Gaskill

Yeah, I have to ask: if the cops have no duty to protect people, what exactly are we paying them our tax dollars for? Why are we spending big bucks outfitting them with all manner of technology and equipment? Why are we granting them authority over us?

 

[Cecilie1200]

There is no job that requires you to commit suicide .

I'm certain there are a lot of people in the military in combat zones who would be surprised to hear that.

 

[Taz]

The kids should be armed as per their 2nd Amendment rights.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I guess "provide for the common defense" isn't so common.

 

[Cecilie1200]

More guns, please.

Yeah. So the cops can show up and shoot the armed teachers . Like they did at that Alabama mall and that Cali club.

I'm glad to know that you assume everyone in the world is as stupid as you. You should be aware, however, that it's not actually the case.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Yeah, I have to ask: if the cops have no duty to protect people, what exactly are we paying them our tax dollars for? Why are we spending big bucks outfitting them with all manner of technology and equipment? Why are we granting them authority over us?

Realizing all that when the facts are analyzed is it paranoid to reason that the police are arming themselves like paramilitary units primarily to subdue and subjugate the citizenry when and if the time ever comes for our government to act like any other authoritarian state (i.e. China for instance) and take total control?

Sadly, I think not.

 

[Oddball]

View attachment 235352

Whiny BS.

Fact.

Insecurity

You're today's deserving recipient!

 

[Asclepias]

View attachment 235352

Whiny BS.

Fact.

Insecurity

You're today's deserving recipient!

View attachment 235395

I dont think they have enough of these for Drumpf supporters.

 

[OldLady]

Cops and schools had no duty to shield students in Parkland shooting, says judge who tossed lawsuit.

Another school district agrees:

Ohio school district votes to allow armed staff members.

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

14 states already allow armed teachers, and 16 states don't prohibit it.....we have actual experience in arming teachers and it works......

When has an armed teacher ever faced down and stopped a mass shooter?

 

[Asclepias]

Cops and schools had no duty to shield students in Parkland shooting, says judge who tossed lawsuit.

Another school district agrees:

Ohio school district votes to allow armed staff members.

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

14 states already allow armed teachers, and 16 states don't prohibit it.....we have actual experience in arming teachers and it works......

When has an armed teacher ever faced down and stopped a mass shooter?

This teacher had two arms and stopped a mass shooter.

https://nypost.com/2018/05/26/teacher-who-confronted-indiana-school-shooter-lauded-as-hero/

 

[Cecilie1200]

Cops and schools had no duty to shield students in Parkland shooting, says judge who tossed lawsuit.

Another school district agrees:

Ohio school district votes to allow armed staff members.

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

14 states already allow armed teachers, and 16 states don't prohibit it.....we have actual experience in arming teachers and it works......

When has an armed teacher ever faced down and stopped a mass shooter?

Rather a red herring when you consider that teachers aren't allowed to be armed in most places.

Nevertheless, since you asked:

Pearl High School shooting - Wikipedia

 

[Asclepias]

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

14 states already allow armed teachers, and 16 states don't prohibit it.....we have actual experience in arming teachers and it works......

When has an armed teacher ever faced down and stopped a mass shooter?

Rather a red herring when you consider that teachers aren't allowed to be armed in most places.

Nevertheless, since you asked:

Pearl High School shooting - Wikipedia

Not to nitpick but.....

"The school's assistant principal, Joel Myrick"

 

[2aguy]

Cops and schools had no duty to shield students in Parkland shooting, says judge who tossed lawsuit.

Another school district agrees:

Ohio school district votes to allow armed staff members.

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

14 states already allow armed teachers, and 16 states don't prohibit it.....we have actual experience in arming teachers and it works......

When has an armed teacher ever faced down and stopped a mass shooter?

Considering schools are essentially gun free zones, at the school shootings no teachers are armed...meanwhile, in the 14 states that already allow teachers to carry guns, you don't see mass public shooters going to those schools..

See the problem with your post?

 

[2aguy]

Cops and schools had no duty to shield students in Parkland shooting, says judge who tossed lawsuit.

Another school district agrees:

Ohio school district votes to allow armed staff members.

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

14 states already allow armed teachers, and 16 states don't prohibit it.....we have actual experience in arming teachers and it works......

When has an armed teacher ever faced down and stopped a mass shooter?

What we know, since most schools are gun free zones....is that where people have been allowed to carry their legal guns, and have been involved in a mass public shooting, they have a 94% success rate at stopping the shooter and saving lives....

94% success rate...and you guys want to keep others from stopping shooters...

 

[Asclepias]

I'll agree with throwing four more armed cops in every school FWIW. This is just an example of a bad decision.

On an individual level, I'd PROBABLY be able to do something heroic to try to save kids I didn't know. I THINK I would.

It would still be HEROIC though and not a common action. A fellow who pulls up lame shouldn't be a cop. Not sure how much I'd prosecute him though....maybe go after the pension saying, "when you signed up to be a cop, you signed up to be a hero, and you weren't so we're not paying out".

Its a tough line though. My kid, I save or die trying. Other kids, or lord knows an adult, I might not reach as far in front of the oncoming train to save.

Every mass shooting is against a soft (unarmed) target.

Having armed teachers changes the equation.

Does having real security at the school not?

I've met a lot of teachers. Gals who were Education Majors seemed to take a liking to me, they like immature fellows maybe lol. I think we may be better just paying real professionals to guard these schools and make them hard targets instead of coping out and not taxing gun sales by expecting education majors to defend your children.

14 states already allow armed teachers, and 16 states don't prohibit it.....we have actual experience in arming teachers and it works......

When has an armed teacher ever faced down and stopped a mass shooter?

Considering schools are essentially gun free zones, at the school shootings no teachers are armed...meanwhile, in the 14 states that already allow teachers to carry guns, you don't see mass public shooters going to those schools..

See the problem with your post?

Not true. I just checked Arizona and they have had some mass school shootings.