This is Why Trump Will Get Slaughtered in November

[Faun]

the chart you posted is inconsistent with the facts regarding food stamp recipients, welfare recipients, the unemployment rates, and the number of americans living below the poverty level.

But you are free to continue to worship your Kenyan messiah.

Here's a hint. The government lies. Obama lies, Hillary lies, senators lie, congressmen lie, the media lies. It takes some effort to find the truth. Try it.

That's because the chart I posted has nothing to do with food stamps. You'd know that if you had a brain in your head. Obama was talking about job growth, not food stamps, when he pointed we're in the 73rd consecutive month of private sector job growth. You trying to change the subject from what he said to food stamps because you were caught lying about what he said is rather amusing to watch though.

If jobs had been increasing the numbers on food stamps and welfare should have been decreasing, right, doofus? People who are working don't need welfare, but the welfare numbers are higher than when your hero took over. He is lying and so are you.

The BLS does not track SNAP recipients. You are thoroughly confused.

Your confusion aside, the BLS does track employment statistics and has reported a net gain of job growth in the private sector in every single month for the last 73 months.

You lied when you denied that.

I don't believe it. It does not make sense when we all know that there are more people on welfare and food stamps and in poverty than when obozo took over.

But, as I said, you are free to believe it if it makes you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel good.

You should know by now that liberals deny basic economics and politics in favor of absurd ideology.

Spits the forum imbecile who doesn't even know the economy was in recession when Obama became president.

Can you be any more divorced from reality? Can you understand why most folks just laugh at your "I hate Liberalism" diatribes?

 

[Redfish]

That's because the chart I posted has nothing to do with food stamps. You'd know that if you had a brain in your head. Obama was talking about job growth, not food stamps, when he pointed we're in the 73rd consecutive month of private sector job growth. You trying to change the subject from what he said to food stamps because you were caught lying about what he said is rather amusing to watch though.

If jobs had been increasing the numbers on food stamps and welfare should have been decreasing, right, doofus? People who are working don't need welfare, but the welfare numbers are higher than when your hero took over. He is lying and so are you.

The BLS does not track SNAP recipients. You are thoroughly confused.

Your confusion aside, the BLS does track employment statistics and has reported a net gain of job growth in the private sector in every single month for the last 73 months.

You lied when you denied that.

I don't believe it. It does not make sense when we all know that there are more people on welfare and food stamps and in poverty than when obozo took over.

But, as I said, you are free to believe it if it makes you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel good.

You should know by now that liberals deny basic economics and politics in favor of absurd ideology.

Spits the forum imbecile who doesn't even know the economy was in recession when Obama became president.

Can you be any more divorced from reality? Can you understand why most folks just laugh at your "I hate Liberalism" diatribes?

total bullshit. there was no recession in 2008. There was a market correction, nothing more.

the so-called recession was a creation of dems and libs to cover Obama's inept economic policies.

 

[Toro]

If jobs had been increasing the numbers on food stamps and welfare should have been decreasing, right, doofus? People who are working don't need welfare, but the welfare numbers are higher than when your hero took over. He is lying and so are you.

The BLS does not track SNAP recipients. You are thoroughly confused.

Your confusion aside, the BLS does track employment statistics and has reported a net gain of job growth in the private sector in every single month for the last 73 months.

You lied when you denied that.

I don't believe it. It does not make sense when we all know that there are more people on welfare and food stamps and in poverty than when obozo took over.

But, as I said, you are free to believe it if it makes you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel good.

You should know by now that liberals deny basic economics and politics in favor of absurd ideology.

Spits the forum imbecile who doesn't even know the economy was in recession when Obama became president.

Can you be any more divorced from reality? Can you understand why most folks just laugh at your "I hate Liberalism" diatribes?

total bullshit. there was no recession in 2008. There was a market correction, nothing more.

the so-called recession was a creation of dems and libs to cover Obama's inept economic policies.

According to the NBER, the organization responsible for recession dating, the recession began in December 2007 and ended June 2009.

The S&P 500 fell 58% form its intraday high to its low, making it the worst bear market since WWII.

 

[Redfish]

The BLS does not track SNAP recipients. You are thoroughly confused.

Your confusion aside, the BLS does track employment statistics and has reported a net gain of job growth in the private sector in every single month for the last 73 months.

You lied when you denied that.

I don't believe it. It does not make sense when we all know that there are more people on welfare and food stamps and in poverty than when obozo took over.

But, as I said, you are free to believe it if it makes you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel good.

You should know by now that liberals deny basic economics and politics in favor of absurd ideology.

Spits the forum imbecile who doesn't even know the economy was in recession when Obama became president.

Can you be any more divorced from reality? Can you understand why most folks just laugh at your "I hate Liberalism" diatribes?

total bullshit. there was no recession in 2008. There was a market correction, nothing more.

the so-called recession was a creation of dems and libs to cover Obama's inept economic policies.

According to the NBER, the organization responsible for recession dating, the recession began in December 2007 and ended June 2009.

The S&P 500 fell 58% form its intraday high to its low, making it the worst bear market since WWII.

Yes, there was a market correction, but there was no recession. Just because the market goes down does not mean we are in recession. There were no bread lines, no mass layoffs, etc. The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

But recession? Nope.

 

[Toro]

I don't believe it. It does not make sense when we all know that there are more people on welfare and food stamps and in poverty than when obozo took over.

But, as I said, you are free to believe it if it makes you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel good.

You should know by now that liberals deny basic economics and politics in favor of absurd ideology.

Spits the forum imbecile who doesn't even know the economy was in recession when Obama became president.

Can you be any more divorced from reality? Can you understand why most folks just laugh at your "I hate Liberalism" diatribes?

total bullshit. there was no recession in 2008. There was a market correction, nothing more.

the so-called recession was a creation of dems and libs to cover Obama's inept economic policies.

According to the NBER, the organization responsible for recession dating, the recession began in December 2007 and ended June 2009.

The S&P 500 fell 58% form its intraday high to its low, making it the worst bear market since WWII.

Yes, there was a market correction, but there was no recession. Just because the market goes down does not mean we are in recession. There were no bread lines, no mass layoffs, etc. The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

But recession? Nope.

Dude, real GDP contracted by 4%. That's a severe recession, the worst since the Great Depression. This isn't open for debate. You're talking about a depression.

And stocks falling isn't a "correction." It was the worst decline in over 60 years.

 

[P@triot]

The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

And why did that happen? Because idiot libtard Bill Clinton signed his 1997 "Community Re-Investment Act" which, in typical libtard socialism, forced banks to give loans to people who couldn't afford it (people who they had previously rejected). This is what liberalism does. It collapses everything.

 

[Redfish]

You should know by now that liberals deny basic economics and politics in favor of absurd ideology.

Spits the forum imbecile who doesn't even know the economy was in recession when Obama became president.

Can you be any more divorced from reality? Can you understand why most folks just laugh at your "I hate Liberalism" diatribes?

total bullshit. there was no recession in 2008. There was a market correction, nothing more.

the so-called recession was a creation of dems and libs to cover Obama's inept economic policies.

According to the NBER, the organization responsible for recession dating, the recession began in December 2007 and ended June 2009.

The S&P 500 fell 58% form its intraday high to its low, making it the worst bear market since WWII.

Yes, there was a market correction, but there was no recession. Just because the market goes down does not mean we are in recession. There were no bread lines, no mass layoffs, etc. The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

But recession? Nope.

Dude, real GDP contracted by 4%. That's a severe recession, the worst since the Great Depression. This isn't open for debate. You're talking about a depression.

And stocks falling isn't a "correction." It was the worst decline in over 60 years.

and the market rebounded higher than ever. I made a lot of money in 08 and 09 by buying when everyone else was selling. There was no recession. You have been fed a pile of dog shit by the far left----------------who by the way, also made a lot of money during that time.

 

[Toro]

and the market rebounded higher than ever. I made a lot of money in 08 and 09 by buying when everyone else was selling. There was no recession. You have been fed a pile of dog shit by the far left----------------who by the way, also made a lot of money during that time.

 

[Faun]

If jobs had been increasing the numbers on food stamps and welfare should have been decreasing, right, doofus? People who are working don't need welfare, but the welfare numbers are higher than when your hero took over. He is lying and so are you.

The BLS does not track SNAP recipients. You are thoroughly confused.

Your confusion aside, the BLS does track employment statistics and has reported a net gain of job growth in the private sector in every single month for the last 73 months.

You lied when you denied that.

I don't believe it. It does not make sense when we all know that there are more people on welfare and food stamps and in poverty than when obozo took over.

But, as I said, you are free to believe it if it makes you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel good.

You should know by now that liberals deny basic economics and politics in favor of absurd ideology.

Spits the forum imbecile who doesn't even know the economy was in recession when Obama became president.

Can you be any more divorced from reality? Can you understand why most folks just laugh at your "I hate Liberalism" diatribes?

total bullshit. there was no recession in 2008. There was a market correction, nothing more.

the so-called recession was a creation of dems and libs to cover Obama's inept economic policies.

Why do you persist in burdening the forum with your insanity?

December 2007 (IV) - June 2009 (II)

And seriously? A "market correction???"

In what wacky rightwingnut universe are "market corrections" noted by 9 million people becoming under/unemployed? $415 billion lost in GDP (2.8%)? And that's not even the entire recession. That's only looking at the recession while Bush was in office.

Do you ever stop lying?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

• 
  Trumponomics: “Disastrous For The Economy”

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Yes, there was a market correction, but there was no recession. Just because the market goes down does not mean we are in recession. There were no bread lines, no mass layoffs, etc. The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

But recession? Nope.

U.S. lost 2.6 million jobs in 2008 - The New York Times

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Yes, there was a market correction, but there was no recession. Just because the market goes down does not mean we are in recession. There were no bread lines, no mass layoffs, etc. The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

But recession? Nope.

The Great Recession—which officially lasted from December 2007 to June 2009—began with the bursting of an 8 trillion dollar housing bubble. The resulting loss of wealth led to sharp cutbacks in consumer spending. This loss of consumption, combined with the financial market chaos triggered by the bursting of the bubble, also led to a collapse in business investment. As consumer spending and business investment dried up, massive job loss followed. In 2008 and 2009, the U.S. labor market lost 8.4 million jobs, or 6.1% of all payroll employment. This was the most dramatic employment contraction (by far) of any recession since the Great Depression. By comparison, in the deep recession that began in 1981, job loss was 3.1%, or only about half as severe. - See more at: The Great Recession | State of Working America

 

[Faun]

Yes, there was a market correction, but there was no recession. Just because the market goes down does not mean we are in recession. There were no bread lines, no mass layoffs, etc. The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

But recession? Nope.

U.S. lost 2.6 million jobs in 2008 - The New York Times

Time and time again, the rightwingnuts here prove they're 51 cards short of a full deck (not counting jokers).

 

[Faun]

Yes, there was a market correction, but there was no recession. Just because the market goes down does not mean we are in recession. There were no bread lines, no mass layoffs, etc. The housing market sucked because all the stupid loans to people who could not afford them were defaulted on.

But recession? Nope.

The Great Recession—which officially lasted from December 2007 to June 2009—began with the bursting of an 8 trillion dollar housing bubble. The resulting loss of wealth led to sharp cutbacks in consumer spending. This loss of consumption, combined with the financial market chaos triggered by the bursting of the bubble, also led to a collapse in business investment. As consumer spending and business investment dried up, massive job loss followed. In 2008 and 2009, the U.S. labor market lost 8.4 million jobs, or 6.1% of all payroll employment. This was the most dramatic employment contraction (by far) of any recession since the Great Depression. By comparison, in the deep recession that began in 1981, job loss was 3.1%, or only about half as severe. - See more at: The Great Recession | State of Working America

And that 8.4 million jobs lost doesn't include the additional 4 million jobs that fell to underemployment.

 

[hunarcy]

Fuck the history. I don't vote by what other people do .. and I don't vote for warmongers.

Hillary will be the winner .. and your vote will have become as ineffective as mine.

Hillary is a warmonger. In 2002, She she was one of the chief advocates in her husband’s inner circle for the 11-week bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 to attempt to resolve the Kosovo crisis. She voted in favor of the authorization to use force in Iraq. In 2008, her presidential campaign has received far more money from defense contractors than any other candidate received.

Support Bernie. He's the best choice.

Damn She sounds like gwb/cheany

Fuck the history. I don't vote by what other people do .. and I don't vote for warmongers.

Hillary will be the winner .. and your vote will have become as ineffective as mine.

Hillary is a warmonger. In 2002, She she was one of the chief advocates in her husband’s inner circle for the 11-week bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 to attempt to resolve the Kosovo crisis. She voted in favor of the authorization to use force in Iraq. In 2008, her presidential campaign has received far more money from defense contractors than any other candidate received.

Support Bernie. He's the best choice.

Damn She sounds like gwb/cheany

You're supporting her.

Why is that funny, eddie. You post support for her all the time.

What's funny is the way you depict her as a warmonger giving her qualities only reserved for the gwb garbage you repubs gave us for 8 years

She is a warmonger. GWB is a good reason to not support another warmonger.

Give Bernie your support.

 

[eddiew]

Hillary is a warmonger. In 2002, She she was one of the chief advocates in her husband’s inner circle for the 11-week bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 to attempt to resolve the Kosovo crisis. She voted in favor of the authorization to use force in Iraq. In 2008, her presidential campaign has received far more money from defense contractors than any other candidate received.

Support Bernie. He's the best choice.

Damn She sounds like gwb/cheany

Hillary is a warmonger. In 2002, She she was one of the chief advocates in her husband’s inner circle for the 11-week bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 to attempt to resolve the Kosovo crisis. She voted in favor of the authorization to use force in Iraq. In 2008, her presidential campaign has received far more money from defense contractors than any other candidate received.

Support Bernie. He's the best choice.

Damn She sounds like gwb/cheany

You're supporting her.

Why is that funny, eddie. You post support for her all the time.

What's funny is the way you depict her as a warmonger giving her qualities only reserved for the gwb garbage you repubs gave us for 8 years

She is a warmonger. GWB is a good reason to not support another warmonger.

Give Bernie your support.

I know what the polls show But I still believe hill has a better chance

 

[Markle]

PLEASE simply show us where either of the Koch brothers made this statement. A legitimate source and link will be fine. Not your typical source of news, the DailyKOS, The Nation, and the Comedy Channel.

I am looking forward to your prompt reply.

I don't know who you are referring to but it certainly isn't me. I read and listen to Canadian News and Media, with the exception of the Comedy Channel. I occasionally read links to American Newspapers such as New York Times or Washington Post. I don't ever post links from any of the services you listed because I don't read them. This link is to CNN, and includes the interview he said it in.

Charles Koch: 'Possible' Clinton could be better than GOP nominee - CNNPolitics.com

Therefore, you lied.

 

[hunarcy]

Damn She sounds like gwb/cheany

Damn She sounds like gwb/cheany

You're supporting her.

Why is that funny, eddie. You post support for her all the time.

What's funny is the way you depict her as a warmonger giving her qualities only reserved for the gwb garbage you repubs gave us for 8 years

She is a warmonger. GWB is a good reason to not support another warmonger.

Give Bernie your support.

I know what the polls show But I still believe hill has a better chance

Hillary is wrong for the nation. She touts old ideas and is a disingenuous warmonger. She will NOT win. She will not attract Bernie supporters and won't win without us.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Rick ‘Hemorrhoids’ Perry endorses Donald ’Ass Cancer’ Trump in hilarious fake campaign ad

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

You're supporting her.

Why is that funny, eddie. You post support for her all the time.

What's funny is the way you depict her as a warmonger giving her qualities only reserved for the gwb garbage you repubs gave us for 8 years

She is a warmonger. GWB is a good reason to not support another warmonger.

Give Bernie your support.

I know what the polls show But I still believe hill has a better chance

Hillary is wrong for the nation. She touts old ideas and is a disingenuous warmonger. She will NOT win. She will not attract Bernie supporters and won't win without us.

I voted for Bernie Sanders in Florida but I sure as shit am not voting for Trump..no way..and I am not sitting it out either ...I am going to do all I can to make sure a monstrous asshole like Trump does not become President
Hillary Clinton Takes a Step to the Left on Health Care
Source: NY Times

“I’m also in favor of what’s called the public option, so that people can buy into Medicare at a certain age,” Mrs. Clinton said on Monday at a campaign event in Virginia.

* * *

She made the remarks as she continues to face a determined challenge on the left from Mr. Sanders, forcing her to essentially fight a two-front war as she seeks to turn her attention to Donald J. Trump and the general election. While Mr. Sanders trails by a substantial number of delegates, his effect continues to be felt in the race as he pressures Mrs. Clinton to adopt more progressive positions.

“Bernie Sanders’s campaign is having an effect on Hillary Clinton’s policies,” said Steve McMahon, a Democratic political consultant from Purple Strategies. “From a progressive point of view, that’s exactly what was hoped for and that is exactly what is happening.”

The idea of allowing people to buy in to Medicare has been discussed in policy circles and in Congress for decades. Mrs. Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, floated a similar proposal in 1998, including it in his State of the Union address that year. The strategy has been embraced by many advocates of single-payer health care as a way to move more Americans into the existing government system. An incremental expansion of Medicare was the hoped-for strategy of Medicare’s original authors.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/us/politics/hillary-clinton-health-care-public-option.html?_r=0