This is why Roy Moore needs to win the Senate Seat...our country may be in the balance....

[nat4900]

Wow...you are delusional.....Reagan's tax cuts led to the highest employment rate we had seen in decades....and every group was getting wealthier....

Really???????

What was the unemployment rate when Obama left office???

 

[Faun]

You rwnj’s are fucking sick in the head.

Yes troll, thinking people are innocent until proven guilty is sick.

Presumption of innocence is legal theory whose boundaries extend no further than a courtroom. There is no such presumption in the court of public opinion.

True but, you freaks ruin people over opinion.

That makes you a freak too because conservatives do it too.

 

[busybee01]

Yep...this writer sets out the problem if Moore loses the race and it is bigger than people think. You may hate Trump, but giving democrats power will destroy the country......

For me, it is about the Supreme Court......all of our freedoms are on the line there.....ginsburg and kennedy likely can't hold out for another 7 years.....and we are in a position to have actual, conservative, constitutionalist justices on the court......

Why Roy Moore and Tax Cuts Matter

Elections have consequences. Suppose the House flips to Democrat control? If it does, you can bet that they will vote to impeach President Trump on day one. Articles of impeachment, however nonsensical, have already been drawn up.

Unlike the Republicans who promised to repeal Obamacare on day one, the Democrats won’t dither. This will be a campaign promise the Democrats will honor. Before the end of January 2018, the Senate will be gearing up for an impeachment trial.

Will the Senate flip? Less likely but every seat counts, even in Alabama.

Two-thirds of the Senate must convict and remove a president. Which is why every vote matters. Even Roy Moore’s. It’s not inconceivable to find 15-20 NeverTrump GOP Senators voting to remove Trump from the White House. McCain, if healthy enough, would vote that way. Moore would not. His current electoral opponent Doug Jones undoubtedly would.

The Senate trial would drag on, much like the Robert Mueller Russia collusion investigation, casting a cloud over the White House and any Trump initiatives.

Even if not removed from office, Trump’s term would effectively be over. Judicial appointments, especially to the Supreme Court would be held up under the premise that a president who may soon be removed from office shouldn’t be making lifetime appointments to the bench.


Same with any significant legislation. Trump would be placed in a box that even his force of personality couldn’t overcome.

Could an impeached President Trump win a second term? Would he even try? Why would he bother? Who follows Trump? Third time’s the charm for Hillary? Handsy Joe Biden? Al Franken, if he skates on his predatory activities as Bill Clinton did? Pocahontas Warren?

This is make or break time for the GOP. Can they get their act together and get something done after a year of shooting blanks? Will the GOP work to defeat Roy Moore over 40-year-old dodgy allegations? Giving another Senate seat to the Democrats?

Essentially we should trade our moral values for power. If Roy Moore had any moral values, he would put the interests of the many above the needs of himself. He is a selfish man.

The Republican Party is damaging America. they are extremists in a different way than Democrats are. They don't believe in any regulation. They are more worried about inconveniencing businesses than they are in protecting people. Regulation is necessary and should be well thought out.

I do not want Trump to win a second term. I want the alt-right out and if that means a Democrat President in 2020 then so be it. The Republicans have nothing but bad ideas and they should not be implemented. This so-called tax cut is a good example. A tax cut that is not a tax cut. The rich will overwhelmingly benefit while a number of middle class taxpayers will pay more in taxes.

There is nothing dodgy about the allegations. It is simple. You are putting a pervert who saw noting wrong with dating teens. You can stand with the party or you can stand with your faith.

 

[busybee01]

Yep...this writer sets out the problem if Moore loses the race and it is bigger than people think. You may hate Trump, but giving democrats power will destroy the country......

For me, it is about the Supreme Court......all of our freedoms are on the line there.....ginsburg and kennedy likely can't hold out for another 7 years.....and we are in a position to have actual, conservative, constitutionalist justices on the court......

Why Roy Moore and Tax Cuts Matter

Elections have consequences. Suppose the House flips to Democrat control? If it does, you can bet that they will vote to impeach President Trump on day one. Articles of impeachment, however nonsensical, have already been drawn up.

Unlike the Republicans who promised to repeal Obamacare on day one, the Democrats won’t dither. This will be a campaign promise the Democrats will honor. Before the end of January 2018, the Senate will be gearing up for an impeachment trial.

Will the Senate flip? Less likely but every seat counts, even in Alabama.

Two-thirds of the Senate must convict and remove a president. Which is why every vote matters. Even Roy Moore’s. It’s not inconceivable to find 15-20 NeverTrump GOP Senators voting to remove Trump from the White House. McCain, if healthy enough, would vote that way. Moore would not. His current electoral opponent Doug Jones undoubtedly would.

The Senate trial would drag on, much like the Robert Mueller Russia collusion investigation, casting a cloud over the White House and any Trump initiatives.

Even if not removed from office, Trump’s term would effectively be over. Judicial appointments, especially to the Supreme Court would be held up under the premise that a president who may soon be removed from office shouldn’t be making lifetime appointments to the bench.


Same with any significant legislation. Trump would be placed in a box that even his force of personality couldn’t overcome.

Could an impeached President Trump win a second term? Would he even try? Why would he bother? Who follows Trump? Third time’s the charm for Hillary? Handsy Joe Biden? Al Franken, if he skates on his predatory activities as Bill Clinton did? Pocahontas Warren?

This is make or break time for the GOP. Can they get their act together and get something done after a year of shooting blanks? Will the GOP work to defeat Roy Moore over 40-year-old dodgy allegations? Giving another Senate seat to the Democrats?

It is Republicans who are set on destroying your country. They nearly succeeded under Bush. Your economy was utterly destroyed and in freefall when Obama was elected, shedding 500,000 jobs a monthly. Foreclosures going on everywhere. The stock market lost half its value.

Reagan’s tax cuts lead to high unemployment and a stock market crash as well but the country was on sounder economic footing when Ronnie did it. There weren’t 40 million people relying on earned income credits, food stamps, Medicaid and other forms of government assistance. The working class had savings back then.

When the Bush crash came it hit harder because wages had been stagnant for years, and working class had no savings.

Trump and the Republican Party are preparing to do the same thing as Reagan and Bush did - cut taxes and raise the deficit. It didn’t work when Ronnie did it. It sure as hell didn’t work when Bush did it. And third time won’t be the charm.

Wow...you are delusional.....Reagan's tax cuts led to the highest employment rate we had seen in decades....and every group was getting wealthier....

These are not Reagan tax cuts. Under the Reagan tax cuts everyone got a tax cut. Also business tax cuts were separate from individual tax cuts. The Republican tax cuts take tax deductions from the people and use it to fund business tax cuts. Also middle class people will see tax increases while the upper class will not.

 

[busybee01]

Fine with me - either way Dems win. Roy wins, we hang him around your neck in the midterms. Roy loses, we gain a seat and STILL paint the GOP and Trump as the Gross Old Pedophiles.

Oh, and thanks for the endorsement Lizard Brain - now you can go hold a big rally in Alabama with Creepy Roy at your side. Apparently as long as a Republican male denies their despicable behavior, you will believe them over 9 extremely credible females.

Yeah.....give up a Senate seat because you guys trot out women just before the election. While you guys circle the wagons around bill clinton, an actual serial rapist, and al franken and john conyers....men who actually used their political office to attack women.....

Had there been more time, and a choice, moore would not have been picked......now, with you morons waiting till there was no chance to replace him to make these allegations, you want us to let you have that seat...while you continue to protect every single one of your rapists....

Sorry.....too much is at stake, we can win the seat and then deal with moore.....when even Dennis Prager says to vote for Moore, you guys can go to hell...

Bill Clinton is not a serial rapist. There isn’t one accusation of rape against Bill Clinton. Anita Broaddrick signed a sworn Affidavit in court that Bill Clinton never raped her. Ken Starr threatened her with perjury charges if she didn’t change her story so she then claimed it was rape. She is the only person who ever claimed that Bill Clinton raped her.

Bill Clinton is a serial adulterer. The overwhelming evidence is that the women he was involved with were willing participants. Furthermore, the one woman who wasn’t willing, Paula Jones, said “No” and left the room.

And the truth.....

Anita Broaddrick signed a sworn Affidavit in court that Bill Clinton never raped her.


Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did not assault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she was raped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she wasraped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.

She told her best friend who was a DON at her nursing home, and also the daughter and her sister of the man another man killed and Clinton pardoned. She also told the man she was having an affair with at the time, who later she married.

Who are the others? You know the other 2.

I do not believe her. Clinton didn't need to rape anyone. Bit her lip and torn pantyhose. Then she went on to fundraise for him.

Remember she said she was RAPED by him.

Keep lying to yourself.........3 allegations of rape...confirmed at the time by friends and family....

And here is a larger list....

Clinton s list of ignored accusers - Illinois Review



Eileen Wellstone, a 19-year-old English woman, said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where Clinton was a student in 1969. In fact, Clinton was expelled from Oxford and earned no degree there.

Juanita Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape. Broaddrick gave a stunning interview to NBC’s Lisa Myers about the assault.

Carolyn Moffet, a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met Gov. Clinton at a political fundraiser and was invited to his hotel room. “When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn’t even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room,” she said.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state title. Gracen later told an interviewer that sex with Clinton was consensual. Her roommate Judy Stokes has said the ex-Miss Arkansas told her she was raped after the incident.

Paula Corbin Jones, an Arkansas state worker, filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after an encounter in a Little Rock hotel room where the then-governor exposed himself and demanded oral sex. Clinton settled the case with Jones with an $850,000 payment.

Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, D.C., political fundraiser, said Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a political trip to the nation’s capital in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She fled.

Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton’s leased campaign plane in 1992, says presidential candidate Clinton exposed himself, grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.

Kathleen Willey, a White House volunteer, said that Clinton grabbed her, fondled her breast and pressed her hand against his genitals during an Oval Office meeting in November 1993. Willey became a target for a Hillary directed smear campaign after she went public.

Why Hillary Is Not Inevitable Bill s Sordid Past The Daily Caller
Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth
Bill Clinton has the real rape problem
Bill Clinton s ong history of sexual assault
Hillary s War on Women

Clinton s list of ignored accusers - Illinois Review

• Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
• Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
• Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
• Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
• Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
• Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
• 22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
• Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
• Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations

• Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
• Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
• 1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
• 1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
• Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
• Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
• Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
• Sally Perdue - post incident threats
• Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
• Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned

By the standard of Moore supporters these should be ignored as well. They have not been tried in any court of law. It is unfair to take allegations that occurred decades ago and come out when Clinton runs for President. You hare a unprincipled hypocrite. If your guy does it then you make excuses and if the other guy does it then he is guilty.

 

[busybee01]

Reagan's tax cuts led to the highest employment rate we had seen in decades

Actually the highest UNEMPLOYMENT rate since the Great Republican Depression, 10.8%.

This was a continuation of the Carter recession. The economy did not start to improve until the last third of the 30% tax cuts were implemented. Cleary the 30% tax cuts should have been implemented immediately rather than over 3 years.

 

[JoeB131]

Let us know when and IF they are convicted of anything.

So you think OJ is innocent, then.

I think most people don't need to wait for a 12 mutants who couldn't get out of jury duty to tell them what is what.

 

[Syriusly]

Yep...this writer sets out the problem if Moore loses the race and it is bigger than people think.

I am glad you are making your position clear:

Whether or not Moore molested that 14 year old girl- you will support him in order to support Trump's agenda.

 

[Toro]

This country survived a Civil War that killed nearly 700,000 people.

I’m pretty sure it will survive the Senatorial electoral loss of a redneck who hit on teenage girls at the mall.

 

[2aguy]

He can be replaced later......and considering the willingness of democrats to allow rapists and sexual predators to not only hold their power but to be lauded as heroes, yeah......winning the seat and then dealing with Moore if he is guilty is worth the effort.

Why Are Republicans Enabling Child Sex Abusers? - Newsweek

And yet the left wing, democrats are the ones trying to change the Psychological diagnostic books to say that child sex isn't wrong, have been running child sex rings through hollywood for decades and are constantly sexualizing young children and teenagers in their movies...

This is a classic example of Projection...when the left takes something they are actually doing, and "projecting" it onto Republicans.....

Psychological projection - Wikipedia

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1]

 

[2aguy]

And the truth.....

Anita Broaddrick signed a sworn Affidavit in court that Bill Clinton never raped her.


Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did not assault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she was raped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she wasraped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.

She told her best friend who was a DON at her nursing home, and also the daughter and her sister of the man another man killed and Clinton pardoned. She also told the man she was having an affair with at the time, who later she married.

Who are the others? You know the other 2.

I do not believe her. Clinton didn't need to rape anyone. Bit her lip and torn pantyhose. Then she went on to fundraise for him.

Remember she said she was RAPED by him.

Keep lying to yourself.........3 allegations of rape...confirmed at the time by friends and family....

And here is a larger list....

Clinton s list of ignored accusers - Illinois Review



Eileen Wellstone, a 19-year-old English woman, said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where Clinton was a student in 1969. In fact, Clinton was expelled from Oxford and earned no degree there.

Juanita Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape. Broaddrick gave a stunning interview to NBC’s Lisa Myers about the assault.

Carolyn Moffet, a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met Gov. Clinton at a political fundraiser and was invited to his hotel room. “When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn’t even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room,” she said.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state title. Gracen later told an interviewer that sex with Clinton was consensual. Her roommate Judy Stokes has said the ex-Miss Arkansas told her she was raped after the incident.

Paula Corbin Jones, an Arkansas state worker, filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after an encounter in a Little Rock hotel room where the then-governor exposed himself and demanded oral sex. Clinton settled the case with Jones with an $850,000 payment.

Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, D.C., political fundraiser, said Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a political trip to the nation’s capital in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She fled.

Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton’s leased campaign plane in 1992, says presidential candidate Clinton exposed himself, grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.

Kathleen Willey, a White House volunteer, said that Clinton grabbed her, fondled her breast and pressed her hand against his genitals during an Oval Office meeting in November 1993. Willey became a target for a Hillary directed smear campaign after she went public.

Why Hillary Is Not Inevitable Bill s Sordid Past The Daily Caller
Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth
Bill Clinton has the real rape problem
Bill Clinton s ong history of sexual assault
Hillary s War on Women

Clinton s list of ignored accusers - Illinois Review

• Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
• Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
• Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
• Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
• Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
• Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
• 22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
• Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
• Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations

• Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
• Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
• 1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
• 1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
• Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
• Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
• Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
• Sally Perdue - post incident threats
• Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
• Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned

Hey cocksuck, quit trying to derail you own thread. This is about a pedophile running for the Senate on the GOP ticket. And you giving him your endorsement. As for proof, that is for court, however, given the number of people that have come forward and stated that Moore had a taste for teenage girls, your excuses for the bastard ring hollow. You may think that it is just fine for a middle aged man to act as a predator on teenage girls, most in this nation do not. So Moore has gone from a shoo-in to a real contest. One that has stained the reputation of the GOP and will stain every campaign now in 2018 whether Moore wins or loses.

Technically, asswipe, I am answering someone elses post.....

And since he can't be proven guilty of anything, he isn't a pedophile, and even if he did it, he would be a pederast, not a pedophile, dumb ass.....

And this doesn't effect the GOP in any way, with more time he wouldn't be the candidate since the GOP has some standards.....there isn't time to go through the mess without handing over the country to a party that wants to kill babies, support actual rapists and sexual predators as policy, who actually support the normalization of child sex, racism and hate....that is your party. The GOP is caught between a rock and a hard place and had there been more time would have been able to do a better job with their votes....

So no, this says nothing about the GOP other than that you can't win by pulling these stunts anymore......

Why keep running from this question...?

If the 14 year old’s account of sexual assault was proven to be true, would you still want Moore to win the election? If you could vote in Alabama, would you still cast your vote for Moore?

If it could be proven true, no. A last minute sketchy accusation in order to win the seat for democrat doesn't cut it...

 

[nat4900]

And yet the left wing, democrats are the ones trying to change the Psychological diagnostic books to say that child sex isn't wrong, have been running child sex rings through hollywood for decades and are constantly sexualizing young children and teenagers in their movies...

This is a classic example of Projection...when the left takes something they are actually doing, and "projecting" it onto Republicans.....

Psychological projection - Wikipedia

Citing Wikipedia, moron??????

How are Tom Foley and Jim Kolbe and Dennis Haster doing with their little children sex escapades??

 

[Theowl32]

Lets let it slide he scopes out GIRLS at high school dances, for partisanship and fear!
AWESOME idea!

Just wondering what the actual proof is. I hear things from both sides. What are the actual confirmed facts in this case?

 

[MarcATL]

+-

Which should be the end of the discussion. She said it didn't happen.

But there's more to it than that.

She can't tell you the date it happened. Or the room number. Or produce any evidence she or Clinton were ever registered at that hotel at the time it happened.

Furthermore, she was supposedly raped, but then she continued to work on Clinton's campaigns and show up at his political events? Really? And then accepted an appointment by Clinton to a state board?

This really does strain credulity.

Here's a more likely explanation- Maybe she did have a fling with Clinton, because, heck, she was already cheating on her husband with her boyfriend, by her own admission. And then her name came up in the smear campaign.

And along comes Ken Starr, who has at that point, ALREADY thrown two women in prison for not testifying the way he wanted. So she's going to tell Starr whatever he wants to hear. She'd have told him Clinton kidnapped the Lindbergh Baby and sank the Lustitania at that point.

PREACH!!!!

 

[Issa]

Lets let it slide he scopes out GIRLS at high school dances, for partisanship and fear!
AWESOME idea!

He can be replaced later......and considering the willingness of democrats to allow rapists and sexual predators to not only hold their power but to be lauded as heroes, yeah......winning the seat and then dealing with Moore if he is guilty is worth the effort.

Wow just wow the lengths you willing to go to have your kind in power. Are you guys conservatives? How can you be?

 

[MarcATL]

That is the dumbest excuse of all time — that she swore Clinton didn’t rape her because she didn’t want the publicity.

..... but then she flips her own denial of being raped and thrusts herself into the national spotlight.



Why don’t you just admit you’re a brain-dead con who accepts any story, no matter how illogical, as long as it attacks a Democrat?

It's how jackasses like 2aguy roll.

 

[MarcATL]

Wow just wow the lengths you willing to go to have your kind in power. Are you guys conservatives? How can you be?

You're absolutely right Issa, they aren't conservatives at all. Not by any stretch of the imagination.

What they are is a bunch of rabid far rightwing, power-struck reactionary hacks.

 

[2aguy]

And yet the left wing, democrats are the ones trying to change the Psychological diagnostic books to say that child sex isn't wrong, have been running child sex rings through hollywood for decades and are constantly sexualizing young children and teenagers in their movies...

This is a classic example of Projection...when the left takes something they are actually doing, and "projecting" it onto Republicans.....

Psychological projection - Wikipedia

Citing Wikipedia, moron??????

How are Tom Foley and Jim Kolbe and Dennis Haster doing with their little children sex escapades??

We dealt with them....and of course hastert wasn't convicted of child abuse, but he got dropped by us on the mere allegations.......you guys....are putting up the shield wall between franken and conyers.......your party is the party of sex crimes.....not ours....

 

[Windparadox]

`
`
Nothing says I love you Jesus more than sending a pedophile to the US congress.

 

[JoeMoma]

You rwnj’s are fucking sick in the head.

Yes troll, thinking people are innocent until proven guilty is sick.

Presumption of innocence is legal theory whose boundaries extend no further than a courtroom. There is no such presumption in the court of public opinion.

So does winning the election equate to being found innocent in the court of public opinion that counts — the voters of Alabama?