Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wrong.
There's a sunset provision because recent motions to override the sunset provision failed?
Come on, you can do better than that. Why is there a sunset provision on the tax cuts at all?
Video here:
Steny Hoyer: We have no intention of allowing the Republican tax increase that their policies would lead to to go into effect for working Americans. Period... Were going to act and make sure that the Republican phase out and increase in taxes does not end as they provided for in the laws they passed.
Breitbart.tv Dem Leader: Expiration of Bush Tax Cuts is Republican Tax Increase
This is rich! I mean now stupid do they think we are? How desperatye are they, to come up with this one!
If Democrats let the tax cuts expire, it's THE REPUBLICAN'S FAULT?????????
That's like a drunk driver blaming the accident on the innocent person, because if he hadn't been there, the drunk wouldn't have hit him.
It's the republican's fault if Democrats allow the tax cuts to sunset??????
Oh man they really ARE desperate with November looming.
How on earth do they think this one works?????
Yea, let's take a look at those. Republicans passed trillions in tax cuts through reconciliation which is why they are "expiring".
52% went to the top 1% meaning the burden of the cost of two unpaid for Republican wars was shifted to the Middle Class.
The "reason" for the tax cuts was to create jobs. Only they were created in China. Companies were able to use that money to move those jobs overseas. Those companies appreciated the help of the Republican leadership.
In China, they just had a strike because of all the suicides in one of those enormous electronic sweatshops. Corporations gave into worker's demands and DOUBLED their salaries to 73 dollars a week, which I guess is what Republicans want American workers to make.
Those are the facts that Republicans keep defending. Why?
It's like Republicans are saying to corporations, "Give me a black eye" and then saying, "Can you make the other one black so they match?"
And then, when they have two black eyes, complain, "They aren't BLACK enough!"
It was the only way to get Democrat support.
No, actually it was the only way to pass the tax cuts without broader Democratic support.
I'll repeat the hint: it's in there precisely because the tax cuts weren't paid for.
Video here:
Steny Hoyer: We have no intention of allowing the Republican tax increase that their policies would lead to to go into effect for working Americans. Period... Were going to act and make sure that the Republican phase out and increase in taxes does not end as they provided for in the laws they passed.
Breitbart.tv Dem Leader: Expiration of Bush Tax Cuts is Republican Tax Increase
This is rich! I mean now stupid do they think we are? How desperatye are they, to come up with this one!
If Democrats let the tax cuts expire, it's THE REPUBLICAN'S FAULT?????????
That's like a drunk driver blaming the accident on the innocent person, because if he hadn't been there, the drunk wouldn't have hit him.
It's the republican's fault if Democrats allow the tax cuts to sunset??????
Oh man they really ARE desperate with November looming.
How on earth do they think this one works?????
Video here:
Breitbart.tv Dem Leader: Expiration of Bush Tax Cuts is Republican Tax Increase
This is rich! I mean now stupid do they think we are? How desperatye are they, to come up with this one!
If Democrats let the tax cuts expire, it's THE REPUBLICAN'S FAULT?????????
That's like a drunk driver blaming the accident on the innocent person, because if he hadn't been there, the drunk wouldn't have hit him.
It's the republican's fault if Democrats allow the tax cuts to sunset??????
Oh man they really ARE desperate with November looming.
How on earth do they think this one works?????
Yea, let's take a look at those. Republicans passed trillions in tax cuts through reconciliation which is why they are "expiring".
52% went to the top 1% meaning the burden of the cost of two unpaid for Republican wars was shifted to the Middle Class.
The "reason" for the tax cuts was to create jobs. Only they were created in China. Companies were able to use that money to move those jobs overseas. Those companies appreciated the help of the Republican leadership.
In China, they just had a strike because of all the suicides in one of those enormous electronic sweatshops. Corporations gave into worker's demands and DOUBLED their salaries to 73 dollars a week, which I guess is what Republicans want American workers to make.
Those are the facts that Republicans keep defending. Why?
It's like Republicans are saying to corporations, "Give me a black eye" and then saying, "Can you make the other one black so they match?"
And then, when they have two black eyes, complain, "They aren't BLACK enough!"
I wonder if Republicans know where those companies got all that money to move jobs to China? And then PAY to train the Chinese? And PAY to build new plants. Bet it cost at least a trillion dollars.
whenever CON$ use the word "real" you know it's fake.No, actually it was the only way to pass the tax cuts without broader Democratic support.
I'll repeat the hint: it's in there precisely because the tax cuts weren't paid for.
That's is inane political speak promoted by the Left to prevent tax reductions.
Real economic history shows that tax decreased spur economic growth, leading to higher aggregate tax revenues. The bill was designed with the sunset provision in order to maneuver through Congress' self-imposed rules.
Higher tax revenues does not always correspond to economic growth. Bush"s cut in the cap gains tax led to higher revenue from speculators dumping capital assets like real estate rather than economic growth. Of course eventually the market becomes saturated and the bottom drops out. Cap gains cuts have historically led to boom and bust economies. Cap gains taxes should be set high to discourage speculation and never changed under any circumstance.
Another perfect example of how no stat can ever be trusted coming from a CON$ervoFascist.The unemployment rate under Bush and the Republican Congres was 4.2!!!!!!!!!!
That didn't change until DEMOCRATS TOOK BACK CONGRESS IN 2006.
Video here:
Steny Hoyer: We have no intention of allowing the Republican tax increase that their policies would lead to to go into effect for working Americans. Period... Were going to act and make sure that the Republican phase out and increase in taxes does not end as they provided for in the laws they passed.
Breitbart.tv Dem Leader: Expiration of Bush Tax Cuts is Republican Tax Increase
This is rich! I mean now stupid do they think we are? How desperatye are they, to come up with this one!
If Democrats let the tax cuts expire, it's THE REPUBLICAN'S FAULT?????????
That's like a drunk driver blaming the accident on the innocent person, because if he hadn't been there, the drunk wouldn't have hit him.
It's the republican's fault if Democrats allow the tax cuts to sunset??????
Oh man they really ARE desperate with November looming.
How on earth do they think this one works?????
well, if breitbart the hack said it... it must be true.
Notice how CON$ always have to put their words in another's mouth to create their Straw Men to debate!!!whenever CON$ use the word "real" you know it's fake.That's is inane political speak promoted by the Left to prevent tax reductions.
Real economic history shows that tax decreased spur economic growth, leading to higher aggregate tax revenues. The bill was designed with the sunset provision in order to maneuver through Congress' self-imposed rules.
Higher tax revenues does not always correspond to economic growth. Bush"s cut in the cap gains tax led to higher revenue from speculators dumping capital assets like real estate rather than economic growth. Of course eventually the market becomes saturated and the bottom drops out. Cap gains cuts have historically led to boom and bust economies. Cap gains taxes should be set high to discourage speculation and never changed under any circumstance.
In other words to discourage capitalism.
This is your liberal speaking. They want "managed" economies, and it never matters to them, they never work.
Another perfect example of how no stat can ever be trusted coming from a CON$ervoFascist.The unemployment rate under Bush and the Republican Congres was 4.2!!!!!!!!!!
That didn't change until DEMOCRATS TOOK BACK CONGRESS IN 2006.
UE was 4.2% for Bush's FIRST 2 months ONLY, up from Clinton's 2000 year long average of 3.97%!!!
UE was 6.3% in June of 2003 after Bush's first "Job creating" tax cut and with a GOP controlled congress.
Notice how CON$ always have to put their words in another's mouth to create their Straw Men to debate!!!whenever CON$ use the word "real" you know it's fake.
Higher tax revenues does not always correspond to economic growth. Bush"s cut in the cap gains tax led to higher revenue from speculators dumping capital assets like real estate rather than economic growth. Of course eventually the market becomes saturated and the bottom drops out. Cap gains cuts have historically led to boom and bust economies. Cap gains taxes should be set high to discourage speculation and never changed under any circumstance.
In other words to discourage capitalism.
This is your liberal speaking. They want "managed" economies, and it never matters to them, they never work.
NO, to discourage SPECULATION!!!!!!!
Can one con on here tell us all why the tax law was written to sunset the year Bush left office?
It was done so they could blame a tax increase on the incoming president.
Even Greenspan says they should be allowed to sunset bcause they are unafordable
Can one con on here tell us all why the tax law was written to sunset the year Bush left office?
BECAUSE BUSH COULDN'T GET ENOUGH SUPPORT FROM DEMOCRTS AND RINOS WITHOUT AGREEING TO THE SUNSET PROVISION!!!!!!!!
Good grief!!!!!!!!!!!!
What density setting are you liberals at today??????
Hi, you have received -361 reputation points from jillian.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
lying imbecile
Regards,
jillian
Can one con on here tell us all why the tax law was written to sunset the year Bush left office?
BECAUSE BUSH COULDN'T GET ENOUGH SUPPORT FROM DEMOCRTS AND RINOS WITHOUT AGREEING TO THE SUNSET PROVISION!!!!!!!!
Good grief!!!!!!!!!!!!
What density setting are you liberals at today??????
another lie...
it sundowned because of the procedure they used to pass it.
freak.
WHY DO YOU THINK THEY USED THAT PROCEDURE, "POLITICAL GENIUS???????????"
Even McCain opposed the tax cuts. Bush had to agree to a sun set provision to get enough votes!
Hi, you have received -361 reputation points from jillian.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
lying imbecile
Regards,
jillian
Hey Jillian, if I'm lying, show me where!
Don't just do something cowardly like this and then run and hide.
This is what a three year old does when they know they can't win the argument. They just yell liar and run away.
