Now you're changing your story; a sure sign you know you're losing but don't want to admit it
You said yourself that you were trying to refute a comment about the economy SINCE REAGAN became president. Now that I've pointed out your dishonest use of statistics (starting 2006 which is almost 20 years AFTER Reagan left office) you're claiming it was about "the economy being in the crapper"
If you were honest, you'd used #'s from 1980-2010 and you wouldn't limit yourself to talking about unemployment. However, I understand why you don't want to talk about how govt spending, budget deficits, and the national debt, increased dramatically after Reagan became president or how many manufacturing jobs left for overseas since Reagan was PresidentYou said yourself that you were trying to refute a comment about the economy SINCE REAGAN became president.
No I am not changing anything sorry I responded to the cmment mad by rdean about reagan.
So why aren't you using stats from Reagans time?
Why should I? What ever Reagan did worked great what obama's doing isn't.