Thinking about Neoconservatism

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by William Joyce, Feb 5, 2004.

  1. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
  2. Comrade
    Offline

    Comrade Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    Ratings:
    +167
    Well I'll take a stab at psychoanalyzing the good doctor:

    "My conclusion: Contemporary neoconservatism fits into the general pattern of Jewish intellectual and political activism I have identified in my work."

    Translation:

    Our "neo-con" government is ran by Jews.


    "Neoconservatives have responded to charges that their foreign policy has a Jewish agenda by labeling any such analysis as “anti-Semitic.”"


    Maybe they just don't know what to make of the assertation that the US government being manipulated for the sake of Jewish , and not US interests.


    "Current key leaders include an astonishing number of individuals well placed to influence the Bush Administration: "


    Not so astonishing when none are actually the President, V.P., the actual of head of a department. A few on the second tier, for sure. But why mention all the Jewish writers dating back to the 30's? So he can tie in select quotes attributable to the Bush admin today? Completely irrelevent.



    However:

    "A common argument is that neoconservatism is not Jewish because of the presence of various non-Jews amongst their ranks. "

    "But in fact, the ability to recruit prominent non-Jews, while nevertheless maintaining a Jewish core and a commitment to Jewish interests, has been a hallmark—perhaps the key hallmark—of influential Jewish intellectual and political movements throughout the 20th century. Freud commented famously on the need for a non-Jew to represent psychoanalysis, a role played by Ernest Jones and C. G. Jung. "



    Freud also said we all wanted to have sex with our mother and kill our father.

    So all non-Jews have this fixation and this proves the government is ran by Jews.

    Get that?



    Remember Musharaff saying in his rant that Jews were running the Western world's media and government? This sounds like the essay version.


    It's anti-Semetic because it presumes the entire political movement is exclusive to the segment of Jews involved in it, and for their exclusive benefit. The base presumption is that what is good for Isreal (fall of Saddam) is not good for the USA, and therefore the Jews are running things.

    I'm not expected to question such Freudian slip's that non-Jews have a different psychology than Jews, who end up being American sheep for the Zionist cabalrun the cattle for their own benefit. This is the PRESUMPTION the professor makes, with absolutely nothing to back it up. History or actions notwithstanding.

    The Iraqi war is not about "a Jewish agenda". However you want to cut it (oil, power, security, basing troops), it's purely the US national interest which benefits in the long run. And were a BIG, mainly non-Jewish nation.


    "Neoconservatives have certainly appealed to American patriotic platitudes in advocating war throughout the Middle East—gushing about spreading American democracy and freedom to the area, while leaving unmentioned their own strong ethnic ties and family links to Israel. "

    Translation:

    American's are dumb sheep buying into the Jew's lies about spreading democracy and freedom.



    More stuff about:

    1. Aparthied in Isreal

    2. Neo-cons today were originally Trotskyite Russians before Russian started booting the Jews out.

    3. as the U.S. acquires an empire in the Middle East

    Ad nauseum.


    Could you guess he is psychology professor in California?
     
  3. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    How, then, was the war in the national interest, and not in the Jews' interest?
     
  4. jon_forward
    Offline

    jon_forward Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,436
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    nashville.tn
    Ratings:
    +5
    this thread is for war on terrorism....your agenda that you push needs to be where it belongs....right next to the Enquirer..and the rest of the scandel sheets.....
     
  5. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    The "war on terrorism" is a war against Arabs, which is in turn a war for Jews. It couldn't be more perfectly placed. I think the one reading the scandal sheets is you.
     
  6. Comrade
    Offline

    Comrade Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    Ratings:
    +167
    "How, then, was the war in the national interest, and not in the Jews' interest?"

    Is it so hard to believe that in many cases our interests coincide with our allies?

    Now you can dispute the actual benefits in the long run to US interests, and even argue there is none.

    So a simple question:

    Does Saddam's removal hurt the interests of Islamists, dictatorships, and the network of terror?


    So YES the war is doing everything it set out to do, in line with US interests.

    Or NO, and the Jews crafted a really dumb plan to benefit the primary enemies of Isreal.
     
  7. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    I wouldn't say the plan was perfect. But it was an attempt by Jews to have the U.S. flex its muscle against a strong Arab country, an attempt that was successful. Probably, an Islamic fundamentalist will get a stronghold in Iraq, and on the surface of it, that wouldn't be good for Zionists. But no matter. Whether secular or religious, the point is, "enemy of Israel," and that enemy must be crushed, even with American blood. Jews get what they want, every time. Unless we say "no."
     
  8. jon_forward
    Offline

    jon_forward Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,436
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    nashville.tn
    Ratings:
    +5
    the only one bringing up race of any sort is you, the only person bringing up religion is you, I find it interesting how you bait people into a discussion and everytime,race is the only issue you talk about,if this isnt baiting I dont know what is...the war on terrorism is not against any one group of people as a whole...but against Islamic Extremist who come in all shapes ,sizes and colors... your views couldnt be more wrong then they are now..but with you its all about the wrong religion or the wrong color isnt it....
     
  9. jon_forward
    Offline

    jon_forward Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,436
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    nashville.tn
    Ratings:
    +5
    :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil: :tinfoil:
     
  10. Comrade
    Offline

    Comrade Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    Ratings:
    +167
    "I wouldn't say the plan was perfect. But it was an attempt by Jews to have the U.S. flex its muscle against a strong Arab country, an attempt that was successful."


    -----------
    So the 3% of Jewish America is crafty enough to control it's government and media, discreet enough to make it seem like the democratic process, unified enough to keep it all secret, and yet can't effectively brutalize and subjugate Iraq?

    --------
    "Probably, an Islamic fundamentalist will get a stronghold in Iraq, and on the surface of it, that wouldn't be good for Zionists. But no matter."


    ----------
    Well I expected you had to admit your view of Iraq's future is bad for the US and Isreal alike, you had to. What I don't understand is the how this all ties into the master Jewish plan to destroy the same fundamentalism you say the war has bred.

    Saying it doesn't matter is admitting you can't explain a very key fallacy in your whole world view.


    ------------
    "Whether secular or religious, the point is, "enemy of Israel," and that enemy must be crushed, even with American blood. Jews get what they want, every time. Unless we say "no.""

    -------
    I get everything I ask for, unless they say "no".

    But stay on track here... either secular or religious, your saying the RACE of Jews rule American government in the shadows.

    This RACE has managed to take control of the worlds greatest military and uses it to crush their enemies. These Masters of Political Subversion create a war with Iraq and somehow failed to see the coming Islamic backlash (you say) will take control.

    Is that about right?
     

Share This Page