Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are not good at this kind of thing, stick to reactionary knee-jerk attack.
Shouldnt you be squatting in a park somewhere begging for handouts ???
You even suck at the knee-jerk attack.
Shouldnt you be squatting in a park somewhere begging for handouts ???
You even suck at the knee-jerk attack.
You're wrong. That was funny.
I don't know about 3 million but what about 300 milliion, 3 billion 300 billion? I'm always amazed that people with billions continue to try and earn more billions? Why? Perhaps that's where the greed kicks in, people want money not because it's needed for life but it is their life. Bill Gates, despite his billions, I don't believe is greedy perhaps, he had little choice, the money just rolled in, but others with billions spend their lives trying to make more.
On the other side of the coin there are the ones that just want to have a job, pay their taxes, raise a family and seem to be just as happy. The problem may be that one is good for America and one not so good.
So those people that DO strive to build great companies...companies that hire tens of thousands of those that just want to have a job, pay their taxes and raise a family...are not good for America? Gotta be honest with you, Regent...I don't know where you're coming from with this whole idea that people who are driven to be successful are a drain on society. It's actually the other way around. Our problem in America is that there aren't enough of those people anymore not too many.
Perhaps 3 Million in assets..................
The rest should be confiscated by progressive bureaucrats to redistribute to those deemed worthy. Too be "fair"..........
Perhaps 3 Million in assets..................
The rest should be confiscated by progressive bureaucrats to redistribute to those deemed worthy. Too be "fair"..........
You are not good at this kind of thing, stick to reactionary knee-jerk attack.
Shouldnt you be squatting in a park somewhere begging for handouts ???
Perhaps 3 Million in assets..................
The rest should be confiscated by progressive bureaucrats to redistribute to those deemed worthy. Too be "fair"..........
There Should be a Wealth Cap
Perhaps 3 Million in assets..................
The rest should be confiscated by progressive bureaucrats to redistribute to those deemed worthy. Too be "fair"..........
What there should be is a Maximum wage.
You can accumulate as much wealth as you want..but everyone in this wealthy land should be able to live at a base line standard.
And if business leaders are so greedy..they can't see that..perhaps it needs to be a law.
Everyone should work for the government at the same rate. No matter what you're doing. All business should be nationalized and run directly by bureaucrats. It's the "fair" thing to do. it will also eliminate pesky competition and allow for maximum govt. revenues. This should go toward those in poverty.
Perhaps 3 Million in assets..................
The rest should be confiscated by progressive bureaucrats to redistribute to those deemed worthy. Too be "fair"..........
What there should be is a Maximum wage.
You can accumulate as much wealth as you want..but everyone in this wealthy land should be able to live at a base line standard.
And if business leaders are so greedy..they can't see that..perhaps it needs to be a law.
Perhaps 3 Million in assets..................
The rest should be confiscated by progressive bureaucrats to redistribute to those deemed worthy. Too be "fair"..........
What there should be is a Maximum wage.
You can accumulate as much wealth as you want..but everyone in this wealthy land should be able to live at a base line standard.
And if business leaders are so greedy..they can't see that..perhaps it needs to be a law.
Maybe the Libs can decide how many cars we are "allowed" to have or how big our house should be?...how much land we can own...If we exceed their definition of what's "fair" then that will be confiscated by the State....
What a bunch of ass wipes.
Which world?
I've never seen the sort of poverty in Europe I see here.
I do see it in places like Thailand and Haiti.
That would be earth...
Are you saying those statistics are not correct? America's poor are in 84th percentile of world wealth. That's a fact. That you, ONE INDIVIDUAL, hasn't experienced poverty in every country of the world does not change that fact. So I ask again, exactly what should be the base line standard of which you speak? Exactly how much higher up the ladder of wealth should America's poor be? Identify the percentile please that you would find acceptable.
He thinks food, shelter, education, healthcare...are all rights and should be provided free to all in America.
Everyone should work for the government at the same rate. No matter what you're doing. All business should be nationalized and run directly by bureaucrats. It's the "fair" thing to do. it will also eliminate pesky competition and allow for maximum govt. revenues. This should go toward those in poverty.
Under your proposal, we will all be equally impoverished.
...everyone in this wealthy land should be able to live at a base line standard.
And they do.
The fact our poor are considered rich around the world...in the 84th percentile of worldwide wealth...isn't good enough for you? And the fact our "poor" possess items considered luxuries less than a generation ago...that isn't good enough for you either?
Just what do you consider a reasonable "base line standard" for everyone in America? 90th percentile of wealth? 95th?
Which world?
I've never seen the sort of poverty in Europe I see here.
I do see it in places like Thailand and Haiti.