There is simply no denying it is time for "common sense" gun laws

[tyroneweaver]

We have seen it far too often. Way too many tragic and unnecessary deaths. We have reached the point that no honest person could deny that it is time for "common sense" gun laws. Barack Obama has preached this for 8 straight years now and he has been right all along.

Wherever guns are banned (public schools, universities, movie theaters, etc.) - horrific tragedy ensues. Wherever guns are prevalent (White House, police departments, NRA meetings, etc.) peace and security ensues. Anybody with "common sense" would look at the indisputable reality and immediately implement "common sense" gun laws which would permit firearms everywhere, all the time. Fully automatic weapons in every building (just the Secret Service has while the president is in public). Teachers with guns on them. College students conceal carrying.

Anybody who doesn't support these basic "common sense" gun laws clearly isn't interested in public safety, preserving human life, or security. Instead they are simply interested in control. This one is so obvious - both sides can agree on it. Again - unless someone is more interested in a control/oppression agenda.

do you realize how much of this has taken place under obama
He wants it to happen so he has political capital to ban guns.

 

[Billy000]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

 

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

Because most mass shooters choose "gun-free" zones.

Don't you love the logic? First of all, mass shooters only go where there are no guns. Second, whenever a "mass shooting" is foiled by an armed citizen, nobody's knows because it was foiled. It it consider just an "ordinary" crime. Libtard logic is a special kind of logic

 

[TheOldSchool]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

First of all...Bill O'Reilly is no "hero". He's barely a conservative. Second, even the left-wing NY Times recognizes the ignorant position of both you and Bill O'Reilly...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/sunday-review/the-assault-weapon-myth.html

Oh my how times have changed

Yeah....and you clearly haven't been able to keep up at your age.

I realized over a decade ago that O'Reilly was a douchebag... and you're just now getting there?

Well I suppose I should be happy about it.

 

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

It does! A lot! That "stupid fucking reason" is people like you insisting that we have gun-free victim zones. Armed people don't get shot.

 

[P@triot]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

First of all...Bill O'Reilly is no "hero". He's barely a conservative. Second, even the left-wing NY Times recognizes the ignorant position of both you and Bill O'Reilly...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/sunday-review/the-assault-weapon-myth.html

Oh my how times have changed

Yeah....and you clearly haven't been able to keep up at your age.

I realized over a decade ago that O'Reilly was a douchebag... and you're just now getting there?

Well I suppose I should be happy about it.

Um....where did I say he was a "douche bag"? I said barely conservative. He holds some significant liberal views. Straw man much? Why did you say in that other thread that you like to swallow semen? Care to comment on that?

 

[Agit8r]

Wherever guns are prevalent (White House, police departments, NRA meetings, etc.) peace and security ensues.

Police departments? Where the heck do you live?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

First of all...Bill O'Reilly is no "hero". He's barely a conservative. Second, even the left-wing NY Times recognizes the ignorant position of both you and Bill O'Reilly...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/sunday-review/the-assault-weapon-myth.html

Oh my how times have changed

Yeah....and you clearly haven't been able to keep up at your age.

I realized over a decade ago that O'Reilly was a douchebag... and you're just now getting there?

Well I suppose I should be happy about it.

Um....where did I say he was a "douche bag"? I said barely conservative. He holds some significant liberal views. Straw man much? Why did you say in that other thread that you like to swallow semen? Care to comment on that?

Wow dude... keep making up nonsense and sounding so stupid and you'll be embarrassed into changing your name again

 

[2aguy]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

And he is wrong....one of his blowhard moments.......you can bet old bill has a detail of security around him and his family......

 

[TexM3]

Do you notice how liberals pretty much never say they want to abolish the 2nd amendment?

Nice hedge (pretty much). It's because they know it a major loosing position; they just chip away at it. Like the watch list proposal nonsense.

 

[2aguy]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

that is basically because

1) anti gunners have made almost every public space a gun free zone...so they ban guns for normal people, and then when a shooter goes to that gun free zone they start screeching...see.....a good guy with a gun didn't stop it...

And 2) mass shooters choose gun free locations to do their killing...I have posted the notes, videos and confessions of mass shooters who stated they chose their target based on the absence of armed resistance....

 

[TheOldSchool]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

And he is wrong....one of his blowhard moments.......you can bet old bill has a detail of security around him and his family......

Oh is he allowed to see his family these days? I doubt he has much of a say in anything they do.

 

[OKTexas]

Do you notice how liberals pretty much never say they want to abolish the 2nd amendment?

Really, Rolling Stone Magazine is advocating just that.

 

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here one woman was able to prevent her own rape and/or murder by two men because she was armed. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Fatal Wound: Armed Florida Homeowner Exchanges Gunshots With Robbery Suspects

 

[OKTexas]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

No more than someone being killed by a knife or a club, if an idiot wants to kill they will use the tools available. Then we deal with them.

 

[2aguy]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

Actual research into who commits murder shows that 90% of murderers are violent criminals, with long criminal records and at least one felony and usually a long list of felonies...

of the victims of actual gun murder...70-80% are also criminals with at least one or more felonies......

Those most likely to be murdered with a gun are not normal people, they are violent people with long criminal records....as are the majority of their victims....and they confine most of their killing to tiny areas.....

The New Police Superintendant of Chicago stated that in a city of 3 million people they know 1,300 people who are the shooters and the victims.......they know who they are and where they live....dittos other cities with gang activity...I have the posts and the links which I have posted in the past......

So in 2014, there were 8,124 gun murders...using the above facts, that means only about 1,642 actually innocent people are murdered with guns...and of those, many are associates of criminals who are their friends or family......

so 1,642 innocent victims in a country with 357,000,000 guns in private hands......

Can you tell which number is bigger? And why the difference in the numbers makes your point...pointless?

 

[P@triot]

First of all...Bill O'Reilly is no "hero". He's barely a conservative. Second, even the left-wing NY Times recognizes the ignorant position of both you and Bill O'Reilly...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/sunday-review/the-assault-weapon-myth.html

Oh my how times have changed

Yeah....and you clearly haven't been able to keep up at your age.

I realized over a decade ago that O'Reilly was a douchebag... and you're just now getting there?

Well I suppose I should be happy about it.

Um....where did I say he was a "douche bag"? I said barely conservative. He holds some significant liberal views. Straw man much? Why did you say in that other thread that you like to swallow semen? Care to comment on that?

Wow dude... keep making up nonsense and sounding so stupid and you'll be embarrassed into changing your name again

Says the person who just said that I called Bill O'Reilly a "douchbag". Want to keep talking about "making up nonsense"? If you can't be honest, I'll gladly stoop to your level.

 

[TheOldSchool]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

Lets talk about being "so far up your own ass" and "brainless ideas" junior. Here one woman was able to prevent her own rape and/or murder by two men because she was armed. And you want to take that a way from her. Gee...I wonder why?

Fatal Wound: Armed Florida Homeowner Exchanges Gunshots With Robbery Suspects

I never said that. Correct it or you'll be reported.

 

[2aguy]

Conservative hero Bill O'Reilly:

“There is too much gun crime in the USA, and high-powered weaponry is too easy to get,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly and others seem to consider the AR-15 as a heavy weapon. “That’s the fact. So let’s deal with it. We all have the right to bear arms, but we don’t have the right to buy and maintain mortars. Even if you feel threatened by gangsters or a New World Order. No bazookas, no Sherman tanks, no hand grenades,” O’Reilly said.

Implying Congress does indeed have the power to act, O’Reilly said, “That’s because the Second Amendment clearly states the government has a right to regulate militias, made up of individuals. They have that right in the name of public safety. Therefore, Congress should debate what kind of weapons should be available for public sale.”

And he is wrong....one of his blowhard moments.......you can bet old bill has a detail of security around him and his family......

Oh is he allowed to see his family these days? I doubt he has much of a say in anything they do.

Was there a development in his family situation...I haven't watched him in years....

 

[P@triot]

You people are so far up your own asses. Don't you see how ridiculous your logic is? Ok you want more "good guys" with guns but you fail to realize that by arming everyone you are only increasing the risk of more nut jobs getting guns. It's such a brainless idea.

So you admit you do not want "common sense" gun laws? You want oppression and control. Brainless is ignoring the reality that everywhere guns are banned - horrific tragedies occur. And wherever guns are prevalent, peace and lawfulness ensue.

And let's examine the "good guy" scenario. Many concealed carried people may have good intentions, but many of them probably know next to nothing about gun safety. How do you think that would turn out?

How does that work out? Well...if you knew what you were talking about...you would know that it works out amazingly every time. Millions and millions of crimes prevented by gun owners. That's just the reality. Just admit that you do not want "common sense" gun laws. You want control and oppression.

It's actually statistically rare for a gun owner to actually foil a mass shooter in a public area.

It doesn't have to be a "mass shooter". Every single day in America, an armed citizen stops a murder, armed robbery, or rape. Every day. Why should I be murdered or my wife raped just because you're a pussy? The U.S. Constitution guaranteed you liberty. It did not guarantee you safety or security. If liberty is too scary for you, there are a slew of nanny state socialist nations that would love to have more labor to exploit. Go live your liberal utopia.

Yeah and everyday people get shot for stupid fucking reasons. Doesn't that bother you?

No more than someone being killed by a knife or a club, if an idiot wants to kill they will use the tools available. Then we deal with them.

The Spetsnaz teach that man is the only weapon. Everything else is a tool. And that is a simple fact. Poor Jonbenet Ramsey was found with her panties wrapped around her throat - strangled. Should we outlaw little girls' underwear?