There are two HUGE reasons Gorsuch needs to hit the road

[JohnnyApplesack]

1. Merrick Garland

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way


...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?

isn't it the same basic process?

 

[hadit]

That's dumb.

1. Is it a bad thing, a good thing, or bad when Republicans do it but good when democrats do it?
2. Until convicted, the POTUS is still POTUS. Bubba Clinton continued functioning while he was on trial and when he was impeached.

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

That's dumb.

1. Is it a bad thing, a good thing, or bad when Republicans do it but good when democrats do it?
2. Until convicted, the POTUS is still POTUS. Bubba Clinton continued functioning while he was on trial and when he was impeached.

When did the Dems refuse to give a repub SCOTUS nomination any consideration whatsoever?

Fox 'news' can't help ya with this one tiger

 

[TNHarley]

Lol
That's the answer! Just continue on with partisan dogma! LOVE IT!

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

Lol
That's the answer! Just continue on with partisan dogma! LOVE IT!

you're not partisan at all, eh?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

1. Merrick Garland

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way


...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?

isn't it the same basic process?

1. Garland was an anti-American, anti 2nd Amendment nut.

2. Here's a Vlad for your troubles, Snowflake

 

[martybegan]

1. Merrick Garland

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way


...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?

isn't it the same basic process?

The Republicans rolled the dice on the Garland nomination, and ended up with the hard 8. It was a risk that worked out for them. How much do you want to bet Hillary would have pulled Garland's nomination and picked someone far more to the left (especially if Dems managed to get the Senate )

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That's dumb.

1. Is it a bad thing, a good thing, or bad when Republicans do it but good when democrats do it?
2. Until convicted, the POTUS is still POTUS. Bubba Clinton continued functioning while he was on trial and when he was impeached.

When did the Dems refuse to give a repub SCOTUS nomination any consideration whatsoever?

Fox 'news' can't help ya with this one tiger

Seriously??? Are you THAT fucking ignorant? Biden, Schumer and Reid are all on record as such

"As a senator more than two decades ago, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. argued that President George Bush should delay filling a Supreme Court vacancy, should one arise, until the presidential election was over, and that it was “essential” that the Senate refuse to confirm a nominee to the court until then."

Don't say you never learned anything here

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/23/...elaying-supreme-court-picks-in-1992.html?_r=0

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gorsuch is going to be confirmed, Johnny.

 

[TNHarley]

Lol
That's the answer! Just continue on with partisan dogma! LOVE IT!

you're not partisan at all, eh?

In the SAME OP you blast partisanship and then promote it. You, sir, are a fucking idiot.

 

[Cellblock2429]

1. Merrick Garland

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way


...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?

isn't it the same basic process?

/---- oh boo goo hoo. Ask mommy to change your stinky diaper

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

1. Merrick Garland

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way


...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?

As opposed to asking you or some other Democrat? What would be the difference?

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

1. Merrick Garland

The DNC started the tradition of not appointing a member of the SCOTUS in an election year you ignorant little shit.

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way

The POTUS is not under criminal investigation you lying little faggot, proide the direct quote from Comey to that effect or shut your n!gger cock sucking mouth.

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

1. Merrick Garland

The DNC started the tradition of not appointing a member of the SCOTUS in an election year you ignorant little shit.

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way

The POTUS is not under criminal investigation you lying little faggot, proide the direct quote from Comey to that effect or shut your n!gger cock sucking mouth.

really?

links?

you sound quite angry, can't say as I blame ya

 

[Weatherman2020]

1. Merrick Garland

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way


...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?

isn't it the same basic process?

The butt hurt of knowing the Supreme Court will be upholding the Constitution for the next 3 decades after Trump seats three Justices has got to leave a scar.

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

actually the Merrick Garland issue is enough for the Dems to wait until those on the Trump campaign are charged or cleared of these felony charges

felons don't get to make SCOTUS picks, or at least not so far

 

[Defiant1]

1. Merrick Garland

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way


...why not just ask Putin who should get the nod?

isn't it the same basic process?

The Republicans rolled the dice on the Garland nomination, and ended up with the hard 8. It was a risk that worked out for them. How much do you want to bet Hillary would have pulled Garland's nomination and picked someone far more to the left (especially if Dems managed to get the Senate )

Prior to the election weren't many of the deranged libs salivating at the thought of a Pres. Clinton naming Obama to the court?

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

1. Merrick Garland

The DNC started the tradition of not appointing a member of the SCOTUS in an election year you ignorant little shit.

2. No candidate for SCOTUS picked by a POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI for working with the Russians of all people should be seriously considered, no way

The POTUS is not under criminal investigation you lying little faggot, proide the direct quote from Comey to that effect or shut your n!gger cock sucking mouth.

really?

links?

They already have been provided in this thread IE the NYTs article you illiterate fuckboy.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

actually the Merrick Garland issue is enough for the Dems to wait until those on the Trump campaign are charged or cleared of these felony charges

felons don't get to make SCOTUS picks, or at least not so far

Provide the quote from Comey that anyone from the Trump campaign is under criminal investigation you scumbag lying faggot.

 

[Weatherman2020]

As a community organizer once said - elections have consequences.