Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What did it do to their hiding place?So apparently they killed 36 ISIS fighters with the biggest bomb ever.
That might indeed make it the biggest bomb ever, in the way a movie might be so described.
Still simple-minded I see.So that's what, $500,000 per isis killed ?
It's probably worth noting that Afghanistan is not among ISIS' centers of power. The primary objective, right now, with regard to defeating ISIS is to prevent it from destabilizing and taking hold of the nations where is has a notable "footprint" or stronghold. Right now, that's Syria and Iraq, not Afghanistan. Dropping that bomb on ISIS positions in Iraq or Syria would have made more tactical sense in terms of achieving the goal of attenuating ISIS' effectiveness and ability to expand their holdings.
One can certainly argue the preemptive case for using the MOAB in A-stand; however, one could as well argue that the MOAB, more so than "taking out" essential ISIS-assets, merely preempted the need for Afghans or ISIS to clear and grade the land using non-military means.
That's silliness on your part and no doubt straight out of the pentagons bs dept.
Yep, that 16 million dollar bomb took a whopping 36 ISIS out.
Massive Ordinance Air Blast is what it stands for.It's coming over the news that the U.S. forces for the first time, so we're told, dropped the Mother of All Bombs (MOAB) on one (several?) ISIS positions in Afghanistan. So what? Why does anyone need to know that? The whole world knows that the U.S. is actively fighting ISIS in Iraq and Afghanistan. It should not come as a surprise that the U.S. drops bombs there, big ones, little ones, and in-between ones.
Do you really give a damn what specific munitions the U.S. uses? Do you just care that U.S. forces have and use the appropriate munition for the situation they face? The latter is all I care about. I don't care what type of conventional weapons U.S. forces use in combat.
I'm wondering why the hell we'd advertise that we've dropped the most destructive/powerful bomb in our inventory. If there were any doubt in our opponents' mind about the force limit of our bombs, well, now they need no longer wonder. The problem with that is that now that we've told everyone that we used the MOAB, anyone to whom it matters knows what they must do to protect themselves from it. Better, IMO, to have just dropped the thing and discussed the results it achieved. There's no need to disclose that we dropped the "biggest, baddest" bomb we have.
Still simple-minded I see.So that's what, $500,000 per isis killed ?
What else might this have done?
Well it used to be that 1000 lb bombs dropped from a B-52 were the most powerful.It's coming over the news that the U.S. forces for the first time, so we're told, dropped the Mother of All Bombs (MOAB) on one (several?) ISIS positions in Afghanistan. So what? Why does anyone need to know that? The whole world knows that the U.S. is actively fighting ISIS in Iraq and Afghanistan. It should not come as a surprise that the U.S. drops bombs there, big ones, little ones, and in-between ones.
Do you really give a damn what specific munitions the U.S. uses? Do you just care that U.S. forces have and use the appropriate munition for the situation they face? The latter is all I care about. I don't care what type of conventional weapons U.S. forces use in combat.
I'm wondering why the hell we'd advertise that we've dropped the most destructive/powerful bomb in our inventory. If there were any doubt in our opponents' mind about the force limit of our bombs, well, now they need no longer wonder. The problem with that is that now that we've told everyone that we used the MOAB, anyone to whom it matters knows what they must do to protect themselves from it. Better, IMO, to have just dropped the thing and discussed the results it achieved. There's no need to disclose that we dropped the "biggest, baddest" bomb we have.
We have to use these weapons because tunnel rats with turbans are digging deeper into their rat holes -- is why.Still simple-minded I see.So that's what, $500,000 per isis killed ?
What else might this have done?
Seems like "overkill " so to speak . The Afghan government is not happy about it either.
The attitude that we have to use these weapons , just because they exist, is a dangerous and expensive one.
Still simple-minded I see.So that's what, $500,000 per isis killed ?
What else might this have done?
Seems like "overkill " so to speak . The Afghan government is not happy about it either.
The attitude that we have to use these weapons , just because they exist, is a dangerous and expensive one.
The Afghan government is not happy about it either.
We'll hafta wait and see ... what the bda (bomb damage assessment) turns out to tell us.What did it do to their hiding place?So apparently they killed 36 ISIS fighters with the biggest bomb ever.
That might indeed make it the biggest bomb ever, in the way a movie might be so described.
How many troops would have died going into those tunnels after them?
How does the Afghan President feel about it?
"Afghan President Ashraf Ghani said he approved of the strike and that it was designed to support Afghan forces and US forces conducting clearance operations in the region."
Afghanistan: US defends dropping 'mother of all bombs' - CNN.com
Still simple-minded I see.So that's what, $500,000 per isis killed ?
What else might this have done?
Seems like "overkill " so to speak . The Afghan government is not happy about it either.
The attitude that we have to use these weapons , just because they exist, is a dangerous and expensive one.The Afghan government is not happy about it either.
according to who?
Afghanistan: US defends dropping 'mother of all bombs' - CNN.com
"Afghan President Ashraf Ghani said he approved of the strike and that it was designed to support Afghan forces and US forces conducting clearance operations in the region."
We have to use these weapons because tunnel rats with turbans are digging deeper into their rat holes -- is why.Still simple-minded I see.So that's what, $500,000 per isis killed ?
What else might this have done?
Seems like "overkill " so to speak . The Afghan government is not happy about it either.
The attitude that we have to use these weapons , just because they exist, is a dangerous and expensive one.
Seems like you boy trump goes back and forth with the love from China to Russia.