Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
View attachment 118315Cough cough. Sure. LolKeep telling yourself that while the Muslims in those countries know exactly who the ban is directed at.Really? The guy who twice proclaimed that the Justice Department was part of the Judicial branch is going to attempt to tell me about the U.S. Constitution?You cannot ban people from entering this country based on their religion.
You can ban foreigners from entering this country for any reason at all - including for no reason. Foreigners have no right of access to the United States. None.
And not for nothing - but President Trump's Executive Order didn't ban anyone based on religion (which would literally be impossible). The ban was based on region.
And it will create many more terrorists. Don't believe me ?.....listen to an expert.
Can you claim you US constitutional rights in Mexico or China?
Of course not. Whoever claimed that?
"Any person" means U.S. citizen, you nitwit. The U.S. Constitution is not an international document. Most 5 year olds can figure this out. Why can't you?If you Constitutional laymen would take the time to actually read every word in the Constitutional excerpt below, you might , for the first time in your lives, really understand what is being posited:
...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"Any person" means all people including tourists, refugees, and even illegals and, ah yes, US citizens.
What is equal protection of the const?"Any person" means U.S. citizen, you nitwit. The U.S. Constitution is not an international document. Most 5 year olds can figure this out. Why can't you?If you Constitutional laymen would take the time to actually read every word in the Constitutional excerpt below, you might , for the first time in your lives, really understand what is being posited:
...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"Any person" means all people including tourists, refugees, and even illegals and, ah yes, US citizens.
And equal protection of the laws isn't the same as equal protection of the constitution.
What is equal protection of the const?"Any person" means U.S. citizen, you nitwit. The U.S. Constitution is not an international document. Most 5 year olds can figure this out. Why can't you?If you Constitutional laymen would take the time to actually read every word in the Constitutional excerpt below, you might , for the first time in your lives, really understand what is being posited:
...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"Any person" means all people including tourists, refugees, and even illegals and, ah yes, US citizens.
And equal protection of the laws isn't the same as equal protection of the constitution.
And patriot is just wrong because the 14th came about to give rights to slaves who were NOT US citizens.
Just as I stated on March 24, 2017...Key word: perceived (and only by left-wingers). It doesn't matter what the unlawful opinion of the 9th circuit court is. The Supreme Court will over rule them. Trump's Executive Order is 100% legal in every way. Trying to rule it illegal based on his campaign - before he was even president - is completely irrational.It doesn't matter what your opinion of the 9th district court is, that was their opinion and the reason they steam rolled the 1st executive order. Now this Hawaii judge has stopped it, citing the same reasons as the 9th. (A percieved Muslim ban.)
There wasn’t a single person alive that didn’t understand that President Trump’s Executive Order was 100% constitutional. Sadly, progressive judges in lower courts attempted to shoot it down out of political activism. They should be criminally charged and removed from the bench. They knowingly violated the law by ruling something “illegal” when they unequivocally knew damn well that is was 100% legal.The Supreme Court on Monday granted President Trump’s request to fully enforce his revised order banning travel to the United States by residents of six mostly Muslim countries...
You’re a foreigner (and an illegal alien), idiot. You have no constitutional rights.Javier Perez has been charged with being an undocumented immigrant in possession of a weapon and faces up to a decade in prison and possible deportation. But Perez's lawyers are arguing that the Second Amendment voids the charges against him -- because it doesn’t specify that noncitizens don’t have the right to bear arms.
Possibly worst OP ever....They don't have a right to free speech. The don't have a right to keep and bear arms. They don't have a right to an attorney. They don't have a right to a phone call. And they can absolutely be held indefinitely without being charged. They have no rights.
Possibly worst OP ever....They don't have a right to free speech. The don't have a right to keep and bear arms. They don't have a right to an attorney. They don't have a right to a phone call. And they can absolutely be held indefinitely without being charged. They have no rights.
96% of the human race has no rights because they are not US citizens. Idiot.
Oh.
Sorry.
Fucking idiot.
This post here by ErikViking is a perfect example of why you should stay in school. Reading comprehension is so important.Possibly worst OP ever. 96% of the human race has no rights because they are not US citizens. Idiot. Oh. Sorry. Fucking idiot....They don't have a right to free speech. The don't have a right to keep and bear arms. They don't have a right to an attorney. They don't have a right to a phone call. And they can absolutely be held indefinitely without being charged. They have no rights.
Actually, you are right. I totally missed the point. I thought you referred to something like US compared “the world” regarding rights. Apologies!This post here by ErikViking is a perfect example of why you should stay in school. Reading comprehension is so important.Possibly worst OP ever. 96% of the human race has no rights because they are not US citizens. Idiot. Oh. Sorry. Fucking idiot....They don't have a right to free speech. The don't have a right to keep and bear arms. They don't have a right to an attorney. They don't have a right to a phone call. And they can absolutely be held indefinitely without being charged. They have no rights.
The “96% of the human race” that you ignorantly reference may or may not have rights. Depends on their country of origin. And that was the entire point of the initial post (a point you would have realized if you weren’t illiterate). I was discussing the U.S. Constitution only - and the fact the U.S. Constitution only applies to American citizens on American soil. Canadians have rights - but those rights are recognized by Canada, not the U.S. I cannot walk into Canada with a firearm and tell them that I have a 2nd Amendment “right” to carry that firearm. Do you know why? Rhetorical question - of course a nitwit such as yourself doesn’t know why. Because the U.S. Constitution is not an international document (as I previously stated). The government of Canada is not governed by the U.S. Constitution.
Which is not a fact. Constitutional rights and protections are also extended to non citizens who come under the jurisdiction of the US.I was discussing the U.S. Constitution only - and the fact the U.S. Constitution only applies to American citizens on American soil.
Of course!Edit: with that said, is anyone really holding a position that the US constitution embrace other than US citizens?
Of course!Edit: with that said, is anyone really holding a position that the US constitution embrace other than US citizens?
Read the thing!
Believe it or not, yes. I just added another link of a foreigner claiming they have a 2nd Amendment “right”. And many progressives on this board claim that any illegal alien in this nation has constitutional rights.Edit: with that said, is anyone really holding a position that the US constitution embrace other than US citizens?
That simply isn’t true. If it were, every citizen in every nation could legally vote in U.S. elections as the constitution guarantees you the right to vote. But of course, everyone knows that they cannot. Only U.S. citizens can vote.Which is not a fact. Constitutional rights and protections are also extended to non citizens who come under the jurisdiction of the US.I was discussing the U.S. Constitution only - and the fact the U.S. Constitution only applies to American citizens on American soil.
Actually the phrase is 'reading for comprehension'. I understand the unfamiliarity of such a concept.The term you are looking for is *loop holes"
Again you are wrong. Here's a couple of examples from the Constitution you appear to worship in ignorance.It applies to U.S. citizens on U.S. soil only.
Hey moron? Both of those apply to U.S. citizens only.Again you are wrong. Here's a couple of examples from the Constitution you appear to worship in ignorance.It applies to U.S. citizens on U.S. soil only.
Article [V] (Amendment 5 - Rights of Persons)
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Article [VI] (Amendment 6 - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions)
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
