The Technical Cleansing Continues

[BluesLegend]

Youtube continues its technical cleansing of people that are to the right of Marx or hold pro-America views.

OMG will you STFU, stop talking, stop posting, stop voting. The left are the tolerant ones these right wingers need to shut up Sean Rush Trump indict them for speaking. We need to pass laws to shut them up. Also, remember the left are tolerant. /sarcasm

 

[HappyJoy]

Start my own company and compete against a monopoly that is prepared to lose endless amounts of money because its monopoly status? Why would I do that when we already have the laws in our books to stop exactly efforts like these? American people just can vote more people like Trump into office who are prepared to uphold the law.

Kick the communists out of the country.

Golfing Gator is yet a other anti-American fascist supporting the Technical Cleansing.

Yes, why indeed would you try and compete when you can just run to the government and have them save you from the evil companies. Is there any problem you do not think running to the government is the solution to?

You big government statist are all the same.

It is a shame you lack the basic intelligence to see the irony in you calling others communists when your solution to the problem is to have the government punish companies for being too successful.

Are anti-trust laws a new thing to you? Yeah, in this country we have laws, if you don't like them I recommend Venezuela.

Further, they company can be considered a utility. In that case they unfortunately can't ban anyone without reason, which is exactly what happened, without warning.

But please go on with your way of fascism. Calling these Antifa friendly folks fascists is great fun.

This is where you should slink away in shame. Don't ever call yourself a small government conservative.

I don't take lectures from leftists who know nothing about what they are talking about.

Doesn't seem that way.

 

[Dana7360]

Are anti-trust laws a new thing to you? Yeah, in this country we have laws, if you don't like them I recommend Venezuela.

Once again, you tout socialistic laws and then tell me to move to Venezuela...you are good at this irony thing.

Further, they company can be considered a utility. In that case they unfortunately can't ban anyone without reason, which is exactly what happened, without warning.

Horseshit. They are not a utility, they are a luxury website that nobody needs to survive.

I find the person you're replying to very funny.

In the Obama years when Obama wanted to regulate the internet as a utility the far right wing radical extremists were screaming it's communism. They demanded that the internet isn't a utility but private business. They were dead set against any regulation of the internet.

trump comes along and removes the regulations Obama puts in place. The trump people cheer. Now that they are experiencing the results of that deregulation they are screaming for the exact same thing the screamed against in the Obama years. These same far right wing radical conservatives are now screaming that the internet is a utility.

I will also point out that when it comes to a baker or florist or photographer these same people say those businesses have a right to pick and choose who their customers are. They get a Supreme Court ruling that says that business can do just that. The far right wing radical extremists cheer the ruling.

Now that business actually picks and chooses who they do business with these same far right wing radical conservatives are screaming about free speech and discrimination. Never mind that it's a private company that has full right to make their own rules within our laws.

You just can't make this stuff up.

 

[Norman]

Are anti-trust laws a new thing to you? Yeah, in this country we have laws, if you don't like them I recommend Venezuela.

Once again, you tout socialistic laws and then tell me to move to Venezuela...you are good at this irony thing.

Further, they company can be considered a utility. In that case they unfortunately can't ban anyone without reason, which is exactly what happened, without warning.

Horseshit. They are not a utility, they are a luxury website that nobody needs to survive.

I find the person you're replying to very funny.

In the Obama years when Obama wanted to regulate the internet as a utility the far right wing radical extremists were screaming it's communism. They demanded that the internet isn't a utility but private business. They were dead set against any regulation of the internet.

trump comes along and removes the regulations Obama puts in place. The trump people cheer. Now that they are experiencing the results of that deregulation they are screaming for the exact same thing the screamed against in the Obama years. These same far right wing radical conservatives are now screaming that the internet is a utility.

I will also point out that when it comes to a baker or florist or photographer these same people say those businesses have a right to pick and choose who their customers are. They get a Supreme Court ruling that says that business can do just that. The far right wing radical extremists cheer the ruling.

Now that business actually picks and chooses who they do business with these same far right wing radical conservatives are screaming about free speech and discrimination. Never mind that it's a private company that has full right to make their own rules within our laws.

You just can't make this stuff up.

Regulating the internet?

Internet is not a company, you are confused. If leftists had their way all "wrong think" would be banned, that's exactly what they are doing at google. So no, hands off.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Instead of whining about it on an Internet forum why not start your own rival company and show them the errors of their ways


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

 

[HenryBHough]

That Soros lives where he alleged does is testimony that the making of wooden stakes is no longer taught even in vocational schools.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

 

[Crepitus]

You guys were the ones who said bakers can not refuse service.

Are you ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes now?

 

[Norman]

You guys were the ones who said bakers can not refuse service.

Are you ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes now?

If you want to talk about gay wedding cakes or any other gay activities you conduct, go make your own thread.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

You fail to see my point. I'm not aware of anyone clamoring for the government to step in and exercise control over YouTube. And I do not support "net neutrality" regulations like YouTube does. My point is, YouTube, under these circumstances, is acting to advance the agenda of the party openly advocating single payor "big government" programs. It's not that they're not free to do it--on the contrary, the posts here are merely expressing their disapproval of that agenda, and you seem to support that agenda (or mock those criticizing it) every opportunity you get.

 

[Crepitus]

You guys were the ones who said bakers can not refuse service.

Are you ready to start baking those gay wedding cakes now?

If you want to talk about gay wedding cakes or any other gay activities you conduct, go make your own thread.

It's directly relevant to your OP.

You're just pissed because hypocrites hate to be called out.

 

[Norman]

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

You fail to see my point. I'm not aware of anyone clamoring for the government to step in and exercise control over YouTube. And I do not support "net neutrality" regulations like YouTube does. My point is, YouTube, under these circumstances, is acting to advance the agenda of the party openly advocating single payor "big government" programs. The posts here are expressing their disapproval of that agenda, and you seem to support that agenda every opportunity you get.

As I understand it, Golfing Gator's family is not American. He shivers at pro American thoughts.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

You fail to see my point. I'm not aware of anyone clamoring for the government to step in and exercise control over YouTube. And I do not support "net neutrality" regulations like YouTube does. My point is, YouTube, under these circumstances, is acting to advance the agenda of the party openly advocating single payor "big government" programs. The posts here are expressing their disapproval of that agenda, and you seem to support that agenda every opportunity you get.

As I understand it, Golfing Gator's family is not American. He shivers at pro American thoughts.

More lies from the defeated. Damn son, you are pathetic.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

You fail to see my point. I'm not aware of anyone clamoring for the government to step in and exercise control over YouTube. And I do not support "net neutrality" regulations like YouTube does. My point is, YouTube, under these circumstances, is acting to advance the agenda of the party openly advocating single payor "big government" programs. It's not that they're not free to do it--on the contrary, the posts here are merely expressing their disapproval of that agenda, and you seem to support that agenda (or mock those criticizing it) every opportunity you get.

Perhaps you are not, but the OP is and so are far too many people that call themselves "conservatives"

Calling for anti-trust laws to be applied is far more than "expressing their disapproval"

 

[Osiris-ODS]

... In the Obama years when Obama wanted to regulate the internet as a utility the far right wing radical extremists were screaming it's communism. They demanded that the internet isn't a utility but private business. They were dead set against any regulation of the internet.

trump comes along and removes the regulations Obama puts in place. The trump people cheer. Now that they are experiencing the results of that deregulation they are screaming for the exact same thing the screamed against in the Obama years. These same far right wing radical conservatives are now screaming that the internet is a utility. ...

This has nothing to do with the Net Neutrality regulations. Net Neutrality regs prohibited telecoms from charging different rates for certain services provided by web providers, such as offering premium bandwidth and ping to certain websites (or streaming services) who were willing to pay more, thereby making it more difficult for others to get hits or stream content. It had absolutely nothing to do with making the content shown by a particular web services provider "neutral." Seriously, you guys need to read less op-ed journalism and more fact based content.

 

[Norman]

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

You fail to see my point. I'm not aware of anyone clamoring for the government to step in and exercise control over YouTube. And I do not support "net neutrality" regulations like YouTube does. My point is, YouTube, under these circumstances, is acting to advance the agenda of the party openly advocating single payor "big government" programs. The posts here are expressing their disapproval of that agenda, and you seem to support that agenda every opportunity you get.

As I understand it, Golfing Gator's family is not American. He shivers at pro American thoughts.

More lies from the defeated. Damn son, you are pathetic.

I am quite certain you yourself stated that your wife is an Asian. Is that true or not?

Defeated... in what? You didn't defeat shit, the point that was made stands even more strongly now than when I made the thread, and will continue to do so long into the future.

 

[Theowl32]

Let's not forget and I will continue to remind everyone what all of this is and where it all started.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You claim to be a libertarian, yet you support selective censorship and mock those who speak out against it. I emphasize "claim."

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

You fail to see my point. I'm not aware of anyone clamoring for the government to step in and exercise control over YouTube. And I do not support "net neutrality" regulations like YouTube does. My point is, YouTube, under these circumstances, is acting to advance the agenda of the party openly advocating single payor "big government" programs. The posts here are expressing their disapproval of that agenda, and you seem to support that agenda every opportunity you get.

As I understand it, Golfing Gator's family is not American. He shivers at pro American thoughts.

More lies from the defeated. Damn son, you are pathetic.

I am quite certain you yourself stated that your wife is an Asian. Is that true or not?

No, that is not true. My wife was born in Oklahoma City and is as white as the day is long! I have never stated such a thing.

I was born in Kansas and spent 20 fucking year defending morons like you while in the Marine Crops...but you are going to accuse me of not having pro American thoughts.

You can kiss my hairy white ass with that bullshit.

I do not want the government to punish people for being successful, something you want to happen..and you have to nerve to call me unAmerican.

 

[Norman]

Yes, I 100% support the liberty of private companies to censor any damn thing they want, that is what being a libertarian is all about.

We do not run to the government every time someone is mean to us like you big government statist do.

You fail to see my point. I'm not aware of anyone clamoring for the government to step in and exercise control over YouTube. And I do not support "net neutrality" regulations like YouTube does. My point is, YouTube, under these circumstances, is acting to advance the agenda of the party openly advocating single payor "big government" programs. The posts here are expressing their disapproval of that agenda, and you seem to support that agenda every opportunity you get.

As I understand it, Golfing Gator's family is not American. He shivers at pro American thoughts.

More lies from the defeated. Damn son, you are pathetic.

I am quite certain you yourself stated that your wife is an Asian. Is that true or not?

No, that is not true. My wife was born in Oklahoma City and is as white as the day is long! I have never stated such a thing.

I was born in Kansas and spent 20 fucking year defending morons like you while in the Marine Crops...but you are going to accuse me of not having pro American thoughts.

You can kiss my hairy white ass with that bullshit.

I do not want the government to punish people for being successful, something you want to happen..and you have to never to call me unAmerican.

I recalled the detail on the wife wrong, but the anti-Americanism is as present as ever.

The company is making massive losses on youtube so try again. They use it to undermine the American people and you the "great defender" are watching in support of the Technical Cleansing.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I recalled the detail on the wife wrong, but the anti-Americanism is as present as ever.

The company is making massive losses on youtube so try again. They use it to undermine the American people and you the "great defender" are watching in support of the Technical Cleansing.

Guess what, it is the companies right to take massive losses if they wish to. It is this odd thing called "liberty"...a word you seem to hate with a passion.