Or possible.Such a peculiar mixture of truth and totally irrational paranoia no cogent response is deserved.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or possible.Such a peculiar mixture of truth and totally irrational paranoia no cogent response is deserved.
Then accept my invitation to the bull ring debate and let's prove who is the fanatic once and for all.You are the poster child for projection.You are the one who has elevated global warming to a religion. I just want the opportunity to expose that in a public way.And I giving him my input. It's totally useless to try and argue with you religious climate deniers.I challenged you to debate this subject in the bull ring. Remember?Give it up dude. In spite of them accusing us of following AGW as a religion it is they who are blindly following a faith that not onlynis based on no facts at all but actually goes against all available facts and current wisdom. You'd have better luck convincing the pope he's not Catholic than these fools.Don’t you think that climate change ISN’T a man made happening?
It's already official. Dingbat, you're a fanatic and a lunatic. Anyways, until you learn how to link, you're useless at debating, everything you say is unsupported personal fartsmoke.Then accept my invitation to the bull ring debate and let's prove who is the fanatic once and for all.You are the poster child for projection.You are the one who has elevated global warming to a religion. I just want the opportunity to expose that in a public way.And I giving him my input. It's totally useless to try and argue with you religious climate deniers.I challenged you to debate this subject in the bull ring. Remember?Give it up dude. In spite of them accusing us of following AGW as a religion it is they who are blindly following a faith that not onlynis based on no facts at all but actually goes against all available facts and current wisdom. You'd have better luck convincing the pope he's not Catholic than these fools.
Because we both know only one of us has studied this subject extensively and it isn't you. You just took it on faith.
They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Yeah, because we are in an interglacial cycle. We’ve been warming for over 20,000 years.Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the PlanetYou could even tell me in simple terms why you believe global warming is happening.Here is where one will find actual "religion", when it comes to climate change:
https://splinternews.com/how-fossil-fuel-money-made-climate-denial-the-word-of-g-1797466298
How can you criticize anyone with a straight face?
Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
Then would you like to debate me in the bull ring, chicken little?It's already official. Dingbat, you're a fanatic and a lunatic. Anyways, until you learn how to link, you're useless at debating, everything you say is unsupported personal fartsmoke.Then accept my invitation to the bull ring debate and let's prove who is the fanatic once and for all.You are the poster child for projection.You are the one who has elevated global warming to a religion. I just want the opportunity to expose that in a public way.And I giving him my input. It's totally useless to try and argue with you religious climate deniers.I challenged you to debate this subject in the bull ring. Remember?
Because we both know only one of us has studied this subject extensively and it isn't you. You just took it on faith.
You will find out in the bull ring, unless you are scared.^^^^^^^^^^ Can't find any real science to back up what he says, just memes.
They are pointing to the man-made effects to climate change. Geez, try to pay attention to what you're looking at.It isn’t. NASA agreed with me that we are in an interglacial cycle and that our current temperature is still below the peak temperatures of the previous interglacial cycles.Don’t you think that climate change ISN’T a man made happening?They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Yeah, because we are in an interglacial cycle. We’ve been warming for over 20,000 years.
Yes, 100%.They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Yeah, because we are in an interglacial cycle. We’ve been warming for over 20,000 years.Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the PlanetYou could even tell me in simple terms why you believe global warming is happening.
How can you criticize anyone with a straight face?Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
I'll send you an invite after work today.They are pointing to the man-made effects to climate change. Geez, try to pay attention to what you're looking at.It isn’t. NASA agreed with me that we are in an interglacial cycle and that our current temperature is still below the peak temperatures of the previous interglacial cycles.Don’t you think that climate change ISN’T a man made happening?They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Yeah, because we are in an interglacial cycle. We’ve been warming for over 20,000 years.
You Heeb.
When you learn how to link properly. Otherwise, I'm simply debating your personal opinion. Same old, same old...Then would you like to debate me in the bull ring, chicken little?It's already official. Dingbat, you're a fanatic and a lunatic. Anyways, until you learn how to link, you're useless at debating, everything you say is unsupported personal fartsmoke.Then accept my invitation to the bull ring debate and let's prove who is the fanatic once and for all.You are the poster child for projection.You are the one who has elevated global warming to a religion. I just want the opportunity to expose that in a public way.And I giving him my input. It's totally useless to try and argue with you religious climate deniers.
Because we both know only one of us has studied this subject extensively and it isn't you. You just took it on faith.
Save it for the bull ring, Taz.When you learn how to link properly. Otherwise, I'm simply debating your personal opinion. Same old, same old...Then would you like to debate me in the bull ring, chicken little?It's already official. Dingbat, you're a fanatic and a lunatic. Anyways, until you learn how to link, you're useless at debating, everything you say is unsupported personal fartsmoke.Then accept my invitation to the bull ring debate and let's prove who is the fanatic once and for all.You are the poster child for projection.You are the one who has elevated global warming to a religion. I just want the opportunity to expose that in a public way.
Because we both know only one of us has studied this subject extensively and it isn't you. You just took it on faith.
You're the one who is afraid to try to link to real science because you know that it would destroy your fantasy world.Yes, 100%.They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Yeah, because we are in an interglacial cycle. We’ve been warming for over 20,000 years.Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
Not what these jack-a-napes do. That is for certain as well.
Then it shouldn't be hard for you to destroy my arguments with links, right? So you literally have no need for me to link at all.You're the one who is afraid to try to link to real science because you know that it would destroy your fantasy world.Yes, 100%.They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Yeah, because we are in an interglacial cycle. We’ve been warming for over 20,000 years.Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
Not what these jack-a-napes do. That is for certain as well.
Then it shouldn't be hard for you to destroy my arguments with links, right? So you literally have no need for me to link at all.You're the one who is afraid to try to link to real science because you know that it would destroy your fantasy world.Yes, 100%.They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
Not what these jack-a-napes do. That is for certain as well.
See you in the bull ring.
Well... they could always provide counter links, right? Unless everything I say is correct, right? Then there would be no links to counter what I say, right?Then it shouldn't be hard for you to destroy my arguments with links, right? So you literally have no need for me to link at all.You're the one who is afraid to try to link to real science because you know that it would destroy your fantasy world.Yes, 100%.They literally agreed with me.Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
Not what these jack-a-napes do. That is for certain as well.
See you in the bull ring.
No link, no evidence, not even if posting underwater is 'evidence' enough for deniers
~S~
Do you realize that what you just wrote is a textbook example of an external locus of control?Then it shouldn't be hard for you to destroy my arguments with links, right? So you literally have no need for me to link at all.You're the one who is afraid to try to link to real science because you know that it would destroy your fantasy world.Yes, 100%.They literally agreed with me.Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
Not what these jack-a-napes do. That is for certain as well.
See you in the bull ring.
No link, no evidence, not even if posting underwater is 'evidence' enough for deniers
~S~
Not gonna go until you learn how to link properly.Save it for the bull ring, Taz.When you learn how to link properly. Otherwise, I'm simply debating your personal opinion. Same old, same old...Then would you like to debate me in the bull ring, chicken little?It's already official. Dingbat, you're a fanatic and a lunatic. Anyways, until you learn how to link, you're useless at debating, everything you say is unsupported personal fartsmoke.Then accept my invitation to the bull ring debate and let's prove who is the fanatic once and for all.You are the poster child for projection.
Because we both know only one of us has studied this subject extensively and it isn't you. You just took it on faith.
You need to learn how to debate first.Then it shouldn't be hard for you to destroy my arguments with links, right? So you literally have no need for me to link at all.You're the one who is afraid to try to link to real science because you know that it would destroy your fantasy world.Yes, 100%.They literally agreed with me.It’s a link to NASA. Go argue with them.Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity.
Not what these jack-a-napes do. That is for certain as well.
See you in the bull ring.