- Thread starter
- #81
Okay here we go. . . .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Romney's staying on point a whole lot better than Obama is, but not sure how the media or fact checkers are gonna rule this.
agree with your points. it was entertaing that for sure and at time it got pretty fiesty . thought they were going to duke it out one point..Well it certainly wasn't boring.
Last debate Obama spoke 4 more minutes than Romney.
Earliest time analysis tonight, Obama spoke 3 more minutes than Romney.
I gave Obama the win on specific points made.
I gave Romney the win on substance.
I am now convinced that neither man had the specific questions, though I do believe Obama was provided the substance of topics that would be asked because Obama had so many canned memorized speeches ready to go--most didn't specifically answer the question but I'm sure the rhetoric pleased his base.
I thought Romney missed two great opportunities to nail Obama on substance--once on energy and once on Lybia--and Romney should have dealt with the 47% thing earlier so Obama wouldn't have it to effectively close.
But all in all a good match. Obama did show up tonight. And it was entertaining.
i don,t think either men given topics. I was bit suprise more was not asked about taxes and healthcare.You believe that Obama was given hints about the topics asked and Romney was not?
I wouldn't want to be a guest in your house when you forget to flush.