The Science is Settled

[LaDexter]

If you deniers are so certain that your faith is not misplaced, you should be jumping on this. After all, if you're right, you're guaranteed a massive payoff, as you'll be the only people in the world investing the correct way. And all denier leaders are morally pure and never scam people, so you don't have to worry about that. So what's holding you back? Take the plunge! Invest!

Rather, we are waiting for the overwhelmingly CHOSEN owners of US beachfront property to start selling at a discount, but the CHOSEN owners who say they believe in your CO2 based hoax aren't selling. I wonder why...

 

[mamooth]

LaDexer, who do you think owns beachfront property that isn't selling? Name names. Include maps of exactly where the house is.

For example, Gore owns a California property up on a hilltop with a distant view of the ocean. Deniers like to lie big and claim it's "beachfront".

 

[LaDexter]

I did not know Gore was CHOSEN, but it makes a lot of sense, given his unreal dishonesty, penchant for profiteering off fraud, and selection of Zionist warmonger Joe Lieberman as VP

 

[jc456]

LaDexer, who do you think owns beachfront property that isn't selling? Name names. Include maps of exactly where the house is.

For example, Gore owns a California property up on a hilltop with a distant view of the ocean. Deniers like to lie big and claim it's "beachfront".

so this implies there are sellers, let's see those names as well. Or do you just get to ask?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In "Earth in the Balance" Gore blamed warming on water vapor.

Are we keeping meticulous records on clouds between 1870 and today?

 

[LaDexter]

When you get to the 2 polar oceans version of Earth, the water vapor goes off the scale. Literally, if you saw the two polar ocean Earth from space, you'd see nothing but clouds in a much thicker atmosphere like a small gas giant, and it would be raining almost all the time.

The dinosaur feathers, they were likely for keeping the animal dry, not flying...

 

[Crick]

In "Earth in the Balance" Gore blamed warming on water vapor.

Are we keeping meticulous records on clouds between 1870 and today?

How meticulous would you like?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In "Earth in the Balance" Gore blamed warming on water vapor.

Are we keeping meticulous records on clouds between 1870 and today?

How meticulous would you like?

Do you have any to share with the class?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In "Earth in the Balance" Gore blamed warming on water vapor.

Are we keeping meticulous records on clouds between 1870 and today?

How meticulous would you like?

Looky here! The IPCC is showing a big uptick is the most powerful GHG, H2O starting in 1993.

Crick, what's the fix?

 

[LaDexter]

The IPCC is showing a big uptick

in the one thing the IPCC pumps out.... FUDGE.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I can't find any charts on water vapor back in 1870 like they have on CO2

 

[Crick]

And so...?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

And so...?

Where's the data for H2O? How about proxy data like you invented for CO2?

 

[Crick]

We certainly have proxies on precipitation. Tree rings likely show some effect from changes in relative humidity. I think there are probably decent records on those sorts of things. Let's look:

Here's NOAA data going back to 1948. This is all instrument data of course, but if you were looking for some correlation with warming, I don't think it's there

 

[Crick]

Here is global precipitation back to 1900

 

[LaDexter]

So it is causing "raining" and it is credited for "droughts."

Whatever the weather, Crick, rocks, and the PARROT will blame CO2...

 

[Crick]

So, jc, you were thinking there was some sort of correlation between clouds and warming? That's been explored pretty thoroughly and hasn't brought up much. There were those folks at CERN who decided they'd found other ways to make clouds and it might be of help to the modelers, but it doesn't refute AGW. It doesn't even put a wee dent in it.

So, what were you thinking?

 

[jc456]

So, jc, you were thinking there was some sort of correlation between clouds and warming? That's been explored pretty thoroughly and hasn't brought up much. There were those folks at CERN who decided they'd found other ways to make clouds and it might be of help to the modelers, but it doesn't refute AGW. It doesn't even put a wee dent in it.

So, what were you thinking?

not sure what you're referencing, this is off topic so I choose to decline comment here.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So it is causing "raining" and it is credited for "droughts."

Whatever the weather, Crick, rocks, and the PARROT will blame CO2...

The only answer is that there must be a left and right handed version of CO2 molecule; one causes droughts, the other, floods.

 

[LaDexter]

Ditto for the past million years, when CO2 froze Greenland while melting North America at the same time...