Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
For those in third world nations, figures like these have a definate negative impact. When you are already spending 60% to 70% of your available income on food, this is a disaster.
Grain Futures Update: updates, news and commentary on grain futures markets including wheat, corn, soybeans and more.
Our Glorious Leader, Barack Obama, has known about global warming longer than scientists have!
It's true, that's why he supported the Weathermen! Bill and Bernadine were visionaries.
For those in third world nations, figures like these have a definate negative impact. When you are already spending 60% to 70% of your available income on food, this is a disaster.
Grain Futures Update: updates, news and commentary on grain futures markets including wheat, corn, soybeans and more.
I think the Obama admins war on energy producers is having an even more dramatic effect. But that would be reality.
Barack Obama: "Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (January 2008)
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4]Obama: My Plan Makes Electricity Rates Skyrocket - YouTube[/ame]
How is a stalled system and extreme weather event? Ask the people in the Midwest. Professor Francis does not have to go the Greenland or anywhere else to study the weather. We do have satellite data, as well as numerous ground station, and weather balloons for studying the weather patterns.
Of course you are not going to watch her lecture, science is something you despise.
How is a stalled system and extreme weather event? Ask the people in the Midwest. Professor Francis does not have to go the Greenland or anywhere else to study the weather. We do have satellite data, as well as numerous ground station, and weather balloons for studying the weather patterns.
Of course you are not going to watch her lecture, science is something you despise.
So Mr. history challenged...how much CO2 was in the atmosphere when this stalled weather pattern flooded the western states? Central CA was turned into an inland sea. The water was 30 miles wide and hundreds of miles long.
You are such a clueless dolt.
The Great Flood of 1862 or Noachian Deluge was the largest flood in the recorded history of Oregon, Nevada and California, occurring from December 1861 to January 1862. It was preceded by weeks of continuous rains (or snows in the high elevations) that began in Oregon in November 1861 and continued into January 1862. This was followed by record quantitative precipitation in January 9-12th, which contributed to a flood which extended from the Columbia River southward in western Oregon and through California to San Diego, and extended as far inland as Idaho in Washington Territory, Nevada and Utah in Utah Territory and Arizona in western New Mexico Territory.
It was climaxed by a warmer, more intense storm with much more rain that was made more serious by the earlier large accumulation of snow, now melted by the rain in the lower elevations of the mountains. Throughout the affected area, all the streams and rivers rose to great heights, flooded the valleys, inundated or swept away towns, mills, dams, flumes, houses, fences, and domestic animals, and ruined fields. Early estimates of property damage was at $10,000,000.[1] However, later it was estimated that approximately one-quarter of the taxable real estate in the state of California was destroyed in the flood. Dependent on property taxes, the State of California went bankrupt. The governor, state legislature, and state employees were not paid for a year and a half.[2]
Great Flood of 1862 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dumb fuck. The absorption spectra of the GHGs was first mapped by Tyndall in England in 1858.
Specifically, what factors might enter into the categorization of a person as a climatologist? When we read "97% of climatologists," from what sample is that figure
derived?
Specifically, what factors might enter into the categorization of a person as a climatologist? When we read "97% of climatologists," from what sample is that figure
derived?
Specifically, what factors might enter into the categorization of a person as a climatologist? When we read "97% of climatologists," from what sample is that figure
derived?
97% of the climatologists who self-selected by responding to the survey.Specifically, what factors might enter into the categorization of a person as a climatologist? When we read "97% of climatologists," from what sample is that figure
derived?
You won`t get an intelligent answer from that freak. Boy the GW "scientists" sure got busy and "revised" Wikipedia about Tyndall...Dumb fuck. The absorption spectra of the GHGs was first mapped by Tyndall in England in 1858.
So, you're saying that Obama's support of the Weather Underground wasn't revolutionary? He was so dedicated to the Weathermen that I was sure he was fighting global warming.
This page was last modified on 26 July 2012 at 19:12.
Frankland and Tyndall became good friends. On the strength of Frankland's prior knowledge, they decided to go to Germany to further their education in science. Among other things, Frankland knew that certain German universities were ahead of any in Britain in experimental chemistry and physics. (British universities were still focused on classics and mathematics and not laboratory science.) The pair moved to Germany in summer 1848 and enrolled at the University of Marburg, where Robert Bunsen was an influential teacher. Tyndall studied under Bunsen for two years.[5] Perhaps more influential for Tyndall at Marburg was Professor Hermann Knoblauch, with whom Tyndall maintained communications by letter for many years afterwards
97% of the climatologists who self-selected by responding to the survey.Specifically, what factors might enter into the categorization of a person as a climatologist? When we read "97% of climatologists," from what sample is that figure
derived?
I'm projecting nothing.
And what relevence are projecting into this proffer?
The screed is a variation on Pascal's Wager, proffered by someone who admits that it's too complex an issue for him to tackle...Yet, somehow or another, not so complex that he can hold forth at length about how something needs to be done about it.
Specifically, what factors might enter into the categorization of a person as a climatologist? When we read "97% of climatologists," from what sample is that figure
derived?
I'm projecting nothing.And what relevence are projecting into this proffer?
The screed is a variation on Pascal's Wager, proffered by someone who admits that it's too complex an issue for him to tackle...Yet, somehow or another, not so complex that he can hold forth at length about how something needs to be done about it.
That's quite a keen observation, Oddball. Re-stated it boils down to:
I say that we MUST do something about this situation about which I understand so little that I cannot even claim to know that "it" exists.
As an added bonus, Trakar and his ilk (no proof required) have the conceit to believe that we have the ability to control the climate.
Specifically, what factors might enter into the categorization of a person as a climatologist? When we read "97% of climatologists," from what sample is that figure
derived?
I think Mann's hockey stick describes it in more detail
