Discussion in 'Politics' started by Lakhota, Dec 24, 2012.
That's not what the Supreme Court says, and their opinion overrules yours.
The People are the Militia; You are either, well regulated or you are not.
It really is that simple, except to the disingenuous, right wing.
it says so in our Second Amendment; only well regulated militias of the People are necessary
The word "only" is not in that amendment, doofus.
You do know, don't you, that you're arguing against the SC and not me?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He is arguing with several voices in his head.
So, based on my analysis, all federal and state gun laws are unconstitutional. Federal laws are unconstitutional because they DIRECTLY violate the plain language of the 2nd Amendment. States had the authority to infringe on the right, until the 14th Amendment made the 2nd Amendment also apply to the States.
Where in the Second Amendment does it use the word "only"?
It says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Notice the comma after the word State? It means an independent clause or statement.
The Supreme Court has on many occasions has upheld the right of the people to keep and bear arms, because that is the correct reading of the 2nd Amendment.
“It’s not about the Second Amendment.”
Faith Hill And Tim McGraw Take Aim At The NRA And Demand Gun Control
I agree! Thank you! It's good to hear from some country music stars who aren't batshit crazy.
Who gives a fuck what Faith Hill thinks?
Machine guns, bitches.
And the liberals are ONCE AGAIN trying to pretend this has no already been pointed out to them, including in this very thread. Some of the same ones who have had this pointed out to the explicitly, are once again pretending the never heard of it.
And here they are, still trying to pretend that the 2nd says weapons are only for militias.
Separate names with a comma.