The Right To Bear Arms

There have been gun laws in this country since the very beginning

https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4825&context=lcp

Only recently has the 2A been claimed as support for unrestricted gun laws.
Simple, judicial activism by the right wing; "bunch of illegals". Special pleading in a vacuum that could virtually power zero point energy, if we could harness it.

Even the South found out that Only well regulated militias of the United States may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
 
When will you learn that the People are the Militia. Only well regulated militia are declared Necessary.

You confuse natural rights with the security of a free State.

When will you learn that the People are the Militia.

I'm part of the People.

I'm almost 70 years old, clinically diagnosed as morbidly obese, on oxygen 24/7, carry an air tank that MIGHT last 2 1/2 hours.

What part of your 'militia' do I belong in?
You are part of the unorganized militia if you don't personally know and get along well with your heavy weapons section.

You are part of the unorganized militia

Can't belong to the unorganized militia.

I can't pass the physical, and I'm too old.

"Unorganized militia – composing the Reserve Militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia.[9]"
Everybody can be part of the militia under the common law for the common defense.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Everybody can be part of the militia under the common law for the common defense.

NO THEY CAN'T

as I've just shown you.
The statutory militia is not the militia. It is merely statutory for conflict of law purposes.
 
"Unorganized militia – composing the Reserve Militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia.[9]"

And of course the "unorganized militia" bears no resemblance to the "Well Regulated Militia" described in Article 1 Section 8 that has officers, rolls,training, and discipline.
And, you omit State militias who have to work with the rest of the citizenry.


Do the State Militias have fewer qualifications to belong?

Do they accept people under the age of17?

over the age of 45?

Less than able-bodied?
 
Our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from intelligently designed, Inception.

Any inferences to gender or race are not binding.

Our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from intelligently designed, Inception.

Right....

Do you also believe women had the right to vote as soon as the Constitution was ratified?
Yes, they did; all they needed to do was ask.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

All Persons born in the US after 1808 are automatically US citizens by natural born birth.

at the time of the signing, women were second rate citizens, could not hold property, could not vote, and definitely could not serve as a member of the Militia.
did you know our Founding Fathers virtually invented, object orientation?

Here is the socialism our Founding Fathers wanted to ordain and establish with the social-ism of our form of federal Government and social Constitution for our Body Politic:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


what, in your weak mind, has that to do with the conversation?

another deflection?
This is your Constitutional objective: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
 
"Unorganized militia – composing the Reserve Militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia.[9]"

And of course the "unorganized militia" bears no resemblance to the "Well Regulated Militia" described in Article 1 Section 8 that has officers, rolls,training, and discipline.
And, you omit State militias who have to work with the rest of the citizenry.


Do the State Militias have fewer qualifications to belong?

Do they accept people under the age of17?

over the age of 45?

Less than able-bodied?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 
Scalia saw that as being far too restrictive for his political objective so he tossed the entire Militia clause out the window,'
That's TRUE legislating from the bench
Your post, above, is a lie.

Scala, like every other intellectually honest individual understands there is a difference between "the militia" and "the people", as well as the fact that the right of "the people", not "the militia" or "the people in the militia" is protected by the 2nd.

You choose to be wrong.
 
"Unorganized militia – composing the Reserve Militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia.[9]"

And of course the "unorganized militia" bears no resemblance to the "Well Regulated Militia" described in Article 1 Section 8 that has officers, rolls,training, and discipline.
And, you omit State militias who have to work with the rest of the citizenry.


Do the State Militias have fewer qualifications to belong?

Do they accept people under the age of17?

over the age of 45?

Less than able-bodied?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

unfit need not apply.
 
And of course the "unorganized militia" bears no resemblance to the "Well Regulated Militia" described in Article 1 Section 8 that has officers, rolls,training, and discipline.
All of which, as you know, is utterly irrelevant to the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the 2nd.
 
Scalia saw that as being far too restrictive for his political objective so he tossed the entire Militia clause out the window,'
That's TRUE legislating from the bench
Your post, above, is a lie.

Scala, like every other intellectually honest individual understands there is a difference between "the militia" and "the people", as well as the fact that the right of "the people", not "the militia" or "the people in the militia" is protected by the 2nd.

You choose to be wrong.
There is no difference. You merely confuse natural rights with what is necessary to the security of a free State.
 
"Unorganized militia – composing the Reserve Militia: every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia.[9]"

And of course the "unorganized militia" bears no resemblance to the "Well Regulated Militia" described in Article 1 Section 8 that has officers, rolls,training, and discipline.
And, you omit State militias who have to work with the rest of the citizenry.


Do the State Militias have fewer qualifications to belong?

Do they accept people under the age of17?

over the age of 45?

Less than able-bodied?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

unfit need not apply.
That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.
 
And of course the "unorganized militia" bears no resemblance to the "Well Regulated Militia" described in Article 1 Section 8 that has officers, rolls,training, and discipline.
And, you omit State militias who have to work with the rest of the citizenry.


Do the State Militias have fewer qualifications to belong?

Do they accept people under the age of17?

over the age of 45?

Less than able-bodied?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

unfit need not apply.
That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

Who? What?

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

Common defense? Common law?

Why don't you try Common sense?

if someone is unfit, physically, they are a hazard to those around them in confrontations.
 
And, you omit State militias who have to work with the rest of the citizenry.


Do the State Militias have fewer qualifications to belong?

Do they accept people under the age of17?

over the age of 45?

Less than able-bodied?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

unfit need not apply.
That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

Who? What?

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

Common defense? Common law?

Why don't you try Common sense?

if someone is unfit, physically, they are a hazard to those around them in confrontations.
You have to actually understand the concepts and context, not just right wing propaganda and rhetoric.

This is the common law for the common defense:

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 
Do the State Militias have fewer qualifications to belong?

Do they accept people under the age of17?

over the age of 45?

Less than able-bodied?
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

unfit need not apply.
That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

Who? What?

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

Common defense? Common law?

Why don't you try Common sense?

if someone is unfit, physically, they are a hazard to those around them in confrontations.
You have to actually understand the concepts and context, not just right wing propaganda and rhetoric.

This is the common law for the common defense:

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Try common sense.

this guy:
th


is useless to a militia.
 
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

unfit need not apply.
That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

Who? What?

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

Common defense? Common law?

Why don't you try Common sense?

if someone is unfit, physically, they are a hazard to those around them in confrontations.
You have to actually understand the concepts and context, not just right wing propaganda and rhetoric.

This is the common law for the common defense:

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Try common sense.

this guy:
th


is useless to a militia.
is Surrender an Option for the militia of the United States?
 
unfit need not apply.
That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

Who? What?

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

Common defense? Common law?

Why don't you try Common sense?

if someone is unfit, physically, they are a hazard to those around them in confrontations.
You have to actually understand the concepts and context, not just right wing propaganda and rhetoric.

This is the common law for the common defense:

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Try common sense.

this guy:
th


is useless to a militia.
is Surrender an Option for the militia of the United States?


Who is talking about surrender?

Is the man in the picture above militia material, or not??
 
That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

That is for when, "Albert stops smiling".

Who? What?

The common defense operates under the common law, literally.

Common defense? Common law?

Why don't you try Common sense?

if someone is unfit, physically, they are a hazard to those around them in confrontations.
You have to actually understand the concepts and context, not just right wing propaganda and rhetoric.

This is the common law for the common defense:

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Try common sense.

this guy:
th


is useless to a militia.
is Surrender an Option for the militia of the United States?


Who is talking about surrender?

Is the man in the picture above militia material, or not??
is surrender and Option, or not?
 
Who? What?

Common defense? Common law?

Why don't you try Common sense?

if someone is unfit, physically, they are a hazard to those around them in confrontations.
You have to actually understand the concepts and context, not just right wing propaganda and rhetoric.

This is the common law for the common defense:

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Try common sense.

this guy:
th


is useless to a militia.
is Surrender an Option for the militia of the United States?


Who is talking about surrender?

Is the man in the picture above militia material, or not??
is surrender and Option, or not?


More deflection?

Why can't you answer the question?

Is the man in the wheelchair, who is part of the People you keep referring to, Militia material?

or have you been talking out your ass?
 

Forum List

Back
Top