The Right To Bear Arms

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Lakhota, Dec 24, 2012.

  1. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    32,431
    Thanks Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +4,345
    For natural rights or the security of a free State?
     
  2. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    32,431
    Thanks Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +4,345
    irrelevant special pleading. Only the right wing, does that.

    There is no "right to arms to fight tyranny" in the US; we have the political process.
     
  3. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    32,431
    Thanks Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +4,345
    dear, the whole and entire difference, is wellness of regulation.

    Only the unorganized militia and gun lovers, whine about not being able to keep and bear Arms, in public venues.
     
  4. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    32,431
    Thanks Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +4,345
    Well regulated militia are necessary to the security of a free State, the unorganized militia and gun lovers, not so much.
     
  5. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    40,954
    Thanks Received:
    5,142
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +20,226
    And yet, fuck you, we have the right to own guns as well.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  6. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    32,431
    Thanks Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +4,345
    so what; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; defense of self and property is not covered by our Second Amendment.
     
  7. KissMy
    Offline

    KissMy Free Breast Exam

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    14,103
    Thanks Received:
    2,352
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +4,042
    Can n!ggers have a F-15 armed with a B-61 Nuclear Bomb & fly it over your house?
     
  8. Rustic
    Offline

    Rustic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    40,559
    Thanks Received:
    3,948
    Trophy Points:
    1,940
    Ratings:
    +24,449
    Buy more guns and ammo...
     
  9. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    40,954
    Thanks Received:
    5,142
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +20,226
    so what; only well regulated militia may not be Infringed

    You are incorrect. Again.

    when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union;

    My right does not require state or union.

    defense of self and property is not covered by our Second Amendment

    You are incorrect. Again.
     
  10. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    32,431
    Thanks Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +4,345
    Nope; it says so in our Second Amendment; only well regulated militias of the People are necessary to the security of a free State, not the People who are the unorganized militia.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

bumbfuckistan

,

gun control