CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,642
- 71,961
- 2,330
That's why I say the American Left is to the left of genuine Communists.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why don't you moonbats organize a boycott by just laying around in your own piss and shit in front of where rich people do business?......
Yeah idiots who look and see FREE MONEY, then turn around and get pissed when they have to pay it back WITH interest..
Uh, no. Customers -- you know -- people who buy products. Interest doesn't even enter the picture (unless they buy the products with credit cards).
There would be no demand if there weren't rich people paying people money which they in turn use to CREATE A DEMAND for a product because they use that money to buy shit.
That's why I say the American Left is to the left of genuine Communists.
And customers get that money from somewhere - someone worked somewhere down the line to pay for those products and those people were paid by people WHO HAVE MONEY..
That's why I say the American Left is to the left of genuine Communists.
And customers get that money from somewhere - someone worked somewhere down the line to pay for those products and those people were paid by people WHO HAVE MONEY..
It starts with the customers, not the capital. If necessary, capital can be borrowed. Customers can't.
More money to rich people does NOT mean more jobs.
More money to middle class and poor people DOES mean more jobs.
And customers get that money from somewhere - someone worked somewhere down the line to pay for those products and those people were paid by people WHO HAVE MONEY..
It starts with the customers, not the capital. If necessary, capital can be borrowed. Customers can't.
More money to rich people does NOT mean more jobs.
More money to middle class and poor people DOES mean more jobs.
[
The customers have to have the capital in order to be customers. The capital used in order to pay those potential customers, which enables them to consume, comes from investors or entrapreneurs.
[
You need capital before you even have the opportunity to provide a customer with goods or services..
[
The customers have to have the capital in order to be customers. The capital used in order to pay those potential customers, which enables them to consume, comes from investors or entrapreneurs.
Not necessarily. It can come from banks; plus, rich people already have plenty of money. (That's why we call them "rich people.")
Capital is already there; no need to worry about that. Money in the hands of people who will buy the products -- that's NOT already there. That's what we need to worry about.
More money to rich people does NOT create jobs.
More money to middle class and poor people DOES create jobs.
That's the bottom line.
Banks don't loan to someone who has no collateral.
Banks don't loan to someone who has no collateral.
Not a problem. There's plenty of collateral, and there's plenty of capital. We don't have a capital shortage. We have a customer shortage, because not enough people are making a decent living.
More money to rich people does NOT create jobs.
Who is creating jobs?
Who is creating jobs?
Nobody; that's the problem. Nobody with capital is investing it in anything that would create jobs, because we have a customer shortage.
Giving more money to people who already have a lot will not solve that problem.
Giving more money to people who don't already have a lot will.
No, Nick, we understand that perfectly well. But we also understand something else, that you DON'T understand, which means that fact doesn't mean what you think it does.
More money to rich people does NOT create jobs.
More money to middle class and poor people DOES create jobs.
Who is creating jobs?
Nobody; that's the problem. Nobody with capital is investing it in anything that would create jobs, because we have a customer shortage.
Giving more money to people who already have a lot will not solve that problem.
Giving more money to people who don't already have a lot will.
I'll put it differently then: Who CAN create jobs which grow the economy? Government is the wrong answer, because government doesn't produce.
A tax cut ≠ "giving more money" to someone. It means stealing less of their own money from them.Giving more money to people who already have a lot will not solve that problem.
Giving more money to people who don't already have a lot will.