The religion of the left: Climate Change

[Dagosa]

I'm saying that much of the world is naive and gullible.

All bought out by Al Gore.

Much means Every effin one. There are no countries, no universities, no govt, no major corporations, no major religions……..that agree with you. None, Zippo, zilch, nada…..

 

[Shareprofit]

The climate in my area is still the same as it was in 1964 when I moved there.

Koppen Classification BSk

You should trave more find out what the real World is like, educate yourself.

 

[Shareprofit]

Completely relevant since currently Earth is in an ICE AGE which is nearing the next Glaciation phase to begin.

You are FRAUD who make these elementary errors over and over because you are stupidly fixated on a tiny time frame and over a negligible warm forcer at the 430 ppm level.

CC is caused by GHG s which has nothing to do with factors that affect glaciation periods.

 

[DBA]

All bought out by Al Gore.

Much means Every effin one. There are no countries, no universities, no govt, no major corporations, no major religions……..that agree with you. None, Zippo, zilch, nada…..

Ok. Don't buy a house near the beach. I'll buy it instead.

If these crooks and ideologues only practiced what they preached, maybe more sensible people would listen.

 

[Shareprofit]

All signs of AGW, not a change in the climate.

AGW causes climate change.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You should trave more find out what the real World is like, educate yourself.

As usual no counterpoint and your comment is empty another sign that are NOT a scientist.

 

[BlindBoo]

? Hidden meaning?

Nope. When we don't have hurricanes in the Atlantic in the summer then we can claim the climate changed due to AGW.

 

[BlindBoo]

AGW causes climate change.

It might. The most drastic predictions aren't coming for several decades or even centuries. Will it stop the grandest feature of the climate of Ice Age we live in? NFL. Adapt or die.

 

[Sunsettommy]

CC is caused by GHG s which has nothing to do with factors that affect glaciation periods.

Ha ha ha, you ignored the FACT that glaciers started melting back nearly 100 years BEFORE CO2 in the atmosphere started going up.

Here is an excellent example:

You haven't addressed it yet.......

Snicker

 

[Dagosa]

Nope. When we don't have hurricanes in the Atlantic in the summer then we can claim the climate changed due to AGW.

? Hidden meaning ? Climate change as a direct cause of forecast weather events can’t be linked to any particular storm. .

 

[westwall]

All signs of AGW, not a change in the climate.

No signal for AGW at all. Merely business as usual.

 

[Sunsettommy]

AGW causes climate change.

You are clearly saying that before 1880, climate never changed for 12,000 years.

Meanwhile according to GISP2 data:

And from several published science research:

No clear CO2/temperature connection at all.

You are pathetic.

 

[westwall]

You are clearly saying that before 1880, climate never changed for 12,000 years.

Meanwhile according to GISP2 data:

And from several published science research:

No clear CO2/temperature connection at all.

You are pathetic.

Shareprofit by his name is a Marxist, so he is neither a scientist, nor a philosopher, but a weak willed anti science religious nutjob.

 

[Dagosa]

Ha ha ha, you ignored the FACT that glaciers started melting back nearly 100 years BEFORE CO2 in the atmosphere started going up.

Here is an excellent example:

You haven't addressed it yet.......

Snicker

You don’t get it do you ? Understood. You don’t know 11 grade math as thats the time many college bound kids take pre calculus

You are clearly saying that before 1880, climate never changed for 12,000 years.

Meanwhile according to GISP2 data:

And from several published science research:

No clear CO2/temperature connection at all.

You are pathetic.

Nope. Nor was mankind even around. How could he be responsible for anything this graph indicates. Another math illiterate.

 

[Dagosa]

You are clearly saying that before 1880, climate never changed for 12,000 years.

Meanwhile according to GISP2 data:

And from several published science research:

No clear CO2/temperature connection at all.

You are pathetic.

Nope. They are saying it never changed SO RAPIDLY.

 

[theHawk]

AGW causes climate change.

That is your belief, your religion.

 

[Sunsettommy]

No signal for AGW at all. Merely business as usual.

Most of the CO2 effect is in the first 100 ppm negligible by the time it reaches 430 ppm which is why it went from weak to negligible warm forcer since 1880 when it started going up.

===

LINK

===

"Next, here is the radical change in downwelling radiation at the surface from the increase in CO2 that is supposed to be driving the “CLIMATE EMERGENCY!!!” What I’ve shown is the change that in theory would have occurred from the changes in CO2 from 1750 to the present, and the change that in theory will occur in the future when CO2 increases from its present value to twice the 1750 value. This is using the generally accepted (although not rigorously derived) claim that the downwelling radiation change from a doubling of CO2 is 3.7 watts per square metre (W/m2). The purpose is to show how small these CO2-caused changes are compared to total downwelling radiation.

The changes in downwelling radiation from the increase in CO2 are trivially small, lost in the noise …"

LINK

 

[Shareprofit]

As usual no counterpoint and your comment is empty another sign that are NOT a scientist.

You probably haven't noticed CC.

 

[Shareprofit]

You are clearly saying that before 1880, climate never changed for 12,000 years.

Meanwhile according to GISP2 data:

And from several published science research:

No clear CO2/temperature connection at all.

You are pathetic.

Hey remember you're the one denying global warming so look at yourself you twit.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You probably haven't noticed CC.

You haven't a cogent reply to make because you can't do it.