The Real Party Of The Rich

[Disir]

Mud doesnt do proof. He believes it and therefore it is the truth. Like a child imaginary friend or the tooth fairy

He's a liar. This isn't a bubble that he is tangoing with. It's intentional and that indicates something far more sinister.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Mud doesnt do proof. He believes it and therefore it is the truth. Like a child imaginary friend or the tooth fairy

He's a liar. This isn't a bubble that he is tangoing with. It's intentional and that indicates something far more sinister.

democrats are at war to destroy the middle class, the Bourgousie. democrats promote an elite - such as George Soros, ruling with absolute power, over an impoverished populace begging for table scraps from the apparatchiks. In other words, the democrats are well on the way to recreating the old USSR in this nation.

 

[Disir]

Mud doesnt do proof. He believes it and therefore it is the truth. Like a child imaginary friend or the tooth fairy

He's a liar. This isn't a bubble that he is tangoing with. It's intentional and that indicates something far more sinister.

democrats are at war to destroy the middle class, the Bourgousie. democrats promote an elite - such as George Soros, ruling with absolute power, over an impoverished populace begging for table scraps from the apparatchiks. In other words, the democrats are well on the way to recreating the old USSR in this nation.

Then you will have no problem proving that. Otherwise, don't waste my time.

 

[mudwhistle]

Mud doesnt do proof. He believes it and therefore it is the truth. Like a child imaginary friend or the tooth fairy

I showed enough proof that anyone other than an Obama fluffer would accept. Do the math.

 

[mudwhistle]

He's a liar. This isn't a bubble that he is tangoing with. It's intentional and that indicates something far more sinister.

democrats are at war to destroy the middle class, the Bourgousie. democrats promote an elite - such as George Soros, ruling with absolute power, over an impoverished populace begging for table scraps from the apparatchiks. In other words, the democrats are well on the way to recreating the old USSR in this nation.

Then you will have no problem proving that. Otherwise, don't waste my time.

Typical Obamamanic response.

Prove something that I'll never accept?

Total waste of time.

Math is a pretty compelling fact, and you won't accept it.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Mud doesnt do proof. He believes it and therefore it is the truth. Like a child imaginary friend or the tooth fairy

I showed enough proof that anyone other than an Obama fluffer would accept. Do the math.

Maybe its because you believe that as long as words are coming out your mouth then they are are true.

If you have links to anything to back up anything you said it would be hard to deny it.

 

[Disir]

democrats are at war to destroy the middle class, the Bourgousie. democrats promote an elite - such as George Soros, ruling with absolute power, over an impoverished populace begging for table scraps from the apparatchiks. In other words, the democrats are well on the way to recreating the old USSR in this nation.

Then you will have no problem proving that. Otherwise, don't waste my time.

Typical Obamamanic response.

Prove something that I'll never accept?

Total waste of time.

Math is a pretty compelling fact, and you won't accept it.

I'm not a democrat. You're a liar and a fraud.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Then you will have no problem proving that. Otherwise, don't waste my time.

Who does your little tin god target as the "rich" to be punished, George Soros, or the doctor making $250K a year?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm not a democrat. You're a liar and a fraud.

Oh, sure you're not....

 

[mudwhistle]

Then you will have no problem proving that. Otherwise, don't waste my time.

Typical Obamamanic response.

Prove something that I'll never accept?

Total waste of time.

Math is a pretty compelling fact, and you won't accept it.

I'm not a democrat. You're a liar and a fraud.

You're a poopy pants scuzzbucket.

 

[Disir]

I'm not a democrat. You're a liar and a fraud.

Oh, sure you're not....

You got nothing. Noted.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm not a democrat. You're a liar and a fraud.

Oh, sure you're not....

You got nothing. Noted.

ROFL

Irony lives..

 

[mudwhistle]

I'm not a democrat. You're a liar and a fraud.

Oh, sure you're not....

You got nothing. Noted.

You got nothing between your ears
Karl......

 

[mudwhistle]

For example, this list does not include casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. He and his wife Miriam donated nearly $93 million in 2012 alone to conservative super PACs — enough to put him at No. 2 on this list. Similarly, the list excludes former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has donated more than $19 million in the past two years, largely to groups that support gun control. Neither Adelson nor Bloomberg — or the organizations they report as their employers — qualifies as a "heavy hitter" under our current definition. It's also important to note that we aren't including donations to politically active dark money groups, like Americans for Prosperity, a group linked to the Koch brothers, or the liberal group Patriot Majority — because these groups hide their donors; see a list of top donors that we've been able to identify to such groups. We are working to revise this list to take into account the new realities of campaign finance created by the Citizens United decision, but as it currently stands, there are significant omissions.


Damn Muddy. Did you read your link? The paragraph above is from your link?

What does it say Muddy about what you propose? Does it say that there is so much "dark money" floating around that they can't determine just how much money is being given and by whom?

Yes sir. That's what they said.

And #2 giver Sheldon Adelson didn't even make the list. But if he did, he would be number two by himself.

You need to try try try again if you really want to convince people that Dems give more than Repubs.

In February 2012, Adelson told Forbes magazine that he is "against very wealthy *people attempting to or influencing elections. But as long as it's doable I'm going to do it. Because I know that guys like Soros have been doing it for years, if not decades. And they stay below the radar by creating a network of corporations to funnel their money. I have my own philosophy and I'm not ashamed of it. I gave the money because there is no other legal way to do it. I don't want to go through ten different corporations to hide my name. I'm proud of what I do and I'm not looking to escape recognition."[30]​

Sheldon Adelson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You were saying????

 

[The T]

Democrats do things by the books and keep their donations open. The radical right like the Koch's and Rove hide their funds in secret superpacs or launder funds through organizations like the US chamber of commerce. The GOP bankrolls the piss out their puppets up and beyond the democrats by a long shot.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Democrats do things by the books and keep their donations open. The radical right like the Koch's and Rove hide their funds in secret superpacs or launder funds through organizations like the US chamber of commerce. The GOP bankrolls the piss out their puppets up and beyond the democrats by a long shot.

Leland Yee proves his point....

 

[Fishlore]

...
When it comes to donations if you look closely the Koch brothers are way down the list. Currently 59th on the Open Secrets list.

Democrats have been getting massive offerings from big-time donors, yet they've been telling us that the GOP is the party of the rich. Turns out it's the Democrats.

Yet another lie the Dems have been pushing down our throats. ...

What is "the party of the rich"? Is it the party with most rich donors? The party whose donors are richer than the donors on the other side? Is it the party whose voters have the highest median family income?

What is indisputably true is that almost all of us accept without question that the economic status of party voters is significant, perhaps even dispositive. This suggests strongly that we recognize that political affiliation is not a matter of philosophy or values but rather an exercise in material self-interest.

Such a view comes from those like Karl Marx who analyze political behavior as class struggle in which the halves or makers, defend their control of the state from attempts to wrest it away by the have-nots or takers. It isn't really what you think about the meaning of the Constitution or the size of government or the limits on individual freedom; the real basis of our politics is the age-old question, "what's in it for me?" God bless America.

 

[The T]

Democrats do things by the books and keep their donations open. The radical right like the Koch's and Rove hide their funds in secret superpacs or launder funds through organizations like the US chamber of commerce. The GOP bankrolls the piss out their puppets up and beyond the democrats by a long shot.

Leland Yee proves his point....

Yeah...BY THE BOOK...Question is? Who's writing the 'BOOK'?

 

[Political Junky]

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: OBAMA CAMPAIGN WEBSITE LACKS IMPORTANT TOOL TO PREVENT ILLEGAL DONATIONS
October 8, 2012 by Mytheos Holt

This past Thursday, TheBlaze teased a potential scandal surrounding President Obama’s donors.
Now, we might know what that scandal is.
According to a report by the conservative nonprofit Government Accountability Institute (GAI), and an explosive series of stories on Breitbart.com and the Daily Caller,
the Obama campaign website appears to be built with an uncharacteristic lack of security where foreign donations are concerned.

Despite donations from foreign sources being illegal under Federal law, all campaigns, whether at the congressional level or the presidential level, have insufficient security to prevent these donations, according to the GAI Report.
The problem afflicts an alarming number of politicians, across all parties.

However, for reasons that remain unclear, the Obama campaign stands apart from its peers in its lack of security preventing these donations.
The most dangerous vulnerabilities for the campaign appear to lie in two separate channels – specifically, the website Obama.com, and the lack of a requirement that users input CCV codes when donating online through their credit cards.

To begin with, Obama.com is owned by Shanghai executive and former Chicago resident Robert Roche, a powerful Obama bundler with enough financial clout to break bread with the President, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and even Chinese President Hu Jintao, at the same time.
Breitbart elaborates on Roche:


In 2011, Mr. Roche obtained one of the most sought-after pieces of real estate in Washington, DC: a seat at the head table for President Obama’s State Dinner for Chinese President Hu Jintao.
How Roche—a man whose infomercial company hawks fitness equipment, cell phones, and breast enhancement products
—landed a seat alongside Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President Bill Clinton, Sen. John Kerry, former President Jimmy Carter, and Chinese President Hu Jintao remains unclear.

Since 2009, White House Visitor Logs list the name Robert Roche at least 19 times, despite the fact Mr. Roche’s primary residence is in China.

Mr. Roche, who is originally from Chicago, is a co-chair of the Technology Initiative for the Obama campaign.

According to Acorn International’s prospectus, the success of Mr. Roche’s company hinges on maintaining access to state-run media
and “preferential tax treatments and subsidies” doled out by the People’s Republic of China (PRC).​

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Obama Campaign Website Lacks Important Tool to Prevent ILLEGAL DONATIONS

Oh yea, based on Breitbart and the Daily Caller.

 

[mudwhistle]

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: OBAMA CAMPAIGN WEBSITE LACKS IMPORTANT TOOL TO PREVENT ILLEGAL DONATIONS
October 8, 2012 by Mytheos Holt

This past Thursday, TheBlaze teased a potential scandal surrounding President Obama’s donors.
Now, we might know what that scandal is.
According to a report by the conservative nonprofit Government Accountability Institute (GAI), and an explosive series of stories on Breitbart.com and the Daily Caller,
the Obama campaign website appears to be built with an uncharacteristic lack of security where foreign donations are concerned.

Despite donations from foreign sources being illegal under Federal law, all campaigns, whether at the congressional level or the presidential level, have insufficient security to prevent these donations, according to the GAI Report.
The problem afflicts an alarming number of politicians, across all parties.

However, for reasons that remain unclear, the Obama campaign stands apart from its peers in its lack of security preventing these donations.
The most dangerous vulnerabilities for the campaign appear to lie in two separate channels – specifically, the website Obama.com, and the lack of a requirement that users input CCV codes when donating online through their credit cards.

To begin with, Obama.com is owned by Shanghai executive and former Chicago resident Robert Roche, a powerful Obama bundler with enough financial clout to break bread with the President, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and even Chinese President Hu Jintao, at the same time.
Breitbart elaborates on Roche:


In 2011, Mr. Roche obtained one of the most sought-after pieces of real estate in Washington, DC: a seat at the head table for President Obama’s State Dinner for Chinese President Hu Jintao.
How Roche—a man whose infomercial company hawks fitness equipment, cell phones, and breast enhancement products
—landed a seat alongside Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President Bill Clinton, Sen. John Kerry, former President Jimmy Carter, and Chinese President Hu Jintao remains unclear.

Since 2009, White House Visitor Logs list the name Robert Roche at least 19 times, despite the fact Mr. Roche’s primary residence is in China.

Mr. Roche, who is originally from Chicago, is a co-chair of the Technology Initiative for the Obama campaign.

According to Acorn International’s prospectus, the success of Mr. Roche’s company hinges on maintaining access to state-run media
and “preferential tax treatments and subsidies” doled out by the People’s Republic of China (PRC).​

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Obama Campaign Website Lacks Important Tool to Prevent ILLEGAL DONATIONS

Oh yea, based on Breitbart and the Daily Caller.

You didn't even go to the link......must be from Breitbart or the Daily Caller.

Epic Fail

Why don't you go to Media Matters and get your liberal fix.