The Politics of Global Warming

[PoliticalChic]

1.At this point, only the most lassitudinous lackeys of Leftism still cling to the global warming scam....what with:

a. "It’s official: no global warming for 18 years 1 month..." It 8217 s official no global warming for 18 years 1 month Watts Up With That

b. Just the other day more evidence came to light that indicts the global warming scam...." The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"... The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever - Telegraph

They've taken to moving sensors from rural settings to urban setting to jack up global temperature data.
What's next, putting them into pizza ovens to get high readings??




2. Those of us more astute have long identified the global warming scam as Marxism's latest attempt to institute global governance. In fact, a study of the nexus of science and politics have seen the attempt before....and today's exposition will review that earlier endeavor.....and its failure.




3. Some science-history:
Some ground-floor geneticists claimed that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime were incorporated in their offspring.

a. Jean Baptiste Lamarck took a great conceptual step and proposed a full-blown theory of evolution, believing that the long necks of giraffes evolved as generations of giraffes reached for ever higher leaves. As each generation's neck increased in length, that trait served as a starting point for successive generation, and so on. Early Concepts of Evolution Jean Baptiste Lamarck

4. Friedrich Weismann disproved this thesis, operating from the other end: he cut the tails off multiple generations of mice, and showed that the result was not shorter tails in the subjects.
Leave it to a German to operate on helpless victims.




5. Which brings us to Trofim Lysenko, Russian 'scientist,' and paragon of Marxist thinking.
He not only exemplifed Kark Marx's thesis of political history, but he is today's illustration of totalitarian government using some iteration of science for their purposes.....just as similar governments use 'Global Warming' today.

Pay attention.

6. "The Disgraceful Episode Of Lysenkoism Brings Us Global Warming Theory"
The Disgraceful Episode Of Lysenkoism Brings Us Global Warming Theory - Forbes


More to come.

 

[SwimExpert]

2. Those of us more astute have long identified the global warming scam as Marxism's latest attempt to institute global governance. In fact, a study of the nexus of science and politics have seen the attempt before....and today's exposition will review that earlier endeavor.....and its failure.

And this is why you're a stupid ****. Global warming is just really, really bad science. Saying stupid shit like the above puts you on the level of Paulitician. Maybe even the level of Rdean and Franco.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The politicization of the climate change issue is fueled more by the right, through corporate anti-environmentalist interests, motivated by profit,

than by anyone else.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Global Warming has nothing in common with science, it's a sick death worshiping Cult.

 

[orogenicman]

To say nothing of the fact that PC rarely posts a coherent sentence.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Cult just published an "Analysis" of their flawed and failed AGW Models, that stated that the models aren't really flawed and failing

 

[SwimExpert]

The politicization of the climate change issue is fueled more by the right, through corporate anti-environmentalist interests, motivated by profit,

than by anyone else.

Evidence?

 

[PoliticalChic]

2. Those of us more astute have long identified the global warming scam as Marxism's latest attempt to institute global governance. In fact, a study of the nexus of science and politics have seen the attempt before....and today's exposition will review that earlier endeavor.....and its failure.

And this is why you're a stupid ****. Global warming is just really, really bad science. Saying stupid shit like the above puts you on the level of Paulitician. Maybe even the level of Rdean and Franco.

I'm going to teach you about the corruption of science to advance Marxist politics....

Stay tuned, and take notes.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The politicization of the climate change issue is fueled more by the right, through corporate anti-environmentalist interests, motivated by profit,

than by anyone else.

Help me here...is this one of your lies, or are you just plan stupid?

 

[Nyvin]

3. Some science-history:
Some ground-floor geneticists claimed that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime were incorporated in their offspring.

a. Jean Baptiste Lamarck took a great conceptual step and proposed a full-blown theory of evolution, believing that the long necks of giraffes evolved as generations of giraffes reached for ever higher leaves. As each generation's neck increased in length, that trait served as a starting point for successive generation, and so on. Early Concepts of Evolution Jean Baptiste Lamarck

4. Friedrich Weismann disproved this thesis, operating from the other end: he cut the tails off multiple generations of mice, and showed that the result was not shorter tails in the subjects.
Leave it to a German to operate on helpless victims.

What the heck does this have to do with anything?

Anyway, even if you put the temperatures aside there's still plenty of evidence that the Earth is changing due to human activity. Killer Whales hunting in further and further northern regions displacing polar bears. Deciduous trees spreading further north. Fish migrations changing. Droughts, floods, intensity of hurricanes, greater storm surge.

The world is actually turning into a scary place. I personally don't think it's a good idea to ignore all of it.

 

[BluesLegend]

I find it suspicious the left's 'solution' to global warming is carbon taxes on the poor and middle class. Why are any tax increases required when you could accomplish change with regulations. I suspect the real goal of the left with this global warming crap is acquiring a perpetual several hundred billion dollar slush fund.

 

[Penelope]

I wouldn't want your great great grandchildren's to know you thought this way. Thankfully there are people who realize what industrialization has done to the AIR, WATER and EARTH , and that our natural resources are finite, except hopefully the sun and wind keep on shinning and blowing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

3. Some science-history:
Some ground-floor geneticists claimed that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime were incorporated in their offspring.

a. Jean Baptiste Lamarck took a great conceptual step and proposed a full-blown theory of evolution, believing that the long necks of giraffes evolved as generations of giraffes reached for ever higher leaves. As each generation's neck increased in length, that trait served as a starting point for successive generation, and so on. Early Concepts of Evolution Jean Baptiste Lamarck

4. Friedrich Weismann disproved this thesis, operating from the other end: he cut the tails off multiple generations of mice, and showed that the result was not shorter tails in the subjects.
Leave it to a German to operate on helpless victims.

What the heck does this have to do with anything?

Anyway, even if you put the temperatures aside there's still plenty of evidence that the Earth is changing due to human activity. Killer Whales hunting in further and further northern regions displacing polar bears. Deciduous trees spreading further north. Fish migrations changing. Droughts, floods, intensity of hurricanes, greater storm surge.

The world is actually turning into a scary place. I personally don't think it's a good idea to ignore all of it.

Imagine what a threat you'd be if you actually had an education.

You might even reduce your hand-wringing, Chicken Little.

For edification:

In the 1860s, News England fishermen where aghast at the 'crisis' caused by net fisherman. The US Fish Commission concluded that netters were going to wipe out entire species of fish! The uproar caused Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island to institute regulations.

"“It’s interesting to see the quotes of the [historical] fishermen,” he says, but he cautions that the evidence is “very anecdotal”. Hiddink also highlights a different modern parallel: the nineteenth-century fishermen who used lines or pots blamed declining catches on those who trawled. “What is typical is the situation where the fishermen are all blaming each other.”
Fishermen Report on Catches from Beyond the Grave - Scientific American



"Despite the fact that the netting continued, the species came back in abundance. The protests had begun during a natural crash in fish populations. They faded out with the new population boom."
Kaufman, Op. Cit., chapter seven.


Dopes like you are exactly what the global warming con artists count on.

 

[Nyvin]

I find it suspicious the left's 'solution' to global warming is carbon taxes on the poor and middle class. Why are any tax increases required when you could accomplish change with regulations. I suspect the real goal of the left with this global warming crap is acquiring a perpetual several hundred billion dollar slush fund.

Any carbon tax would inevitably effect big polluters more than the poor and middle class. The idea behind it would be to create an incentive to switch over to more green technologies rather then keep using polluting methods like coal burning or deforestation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I wouldn't want your great great grandchildren's to know you thought this way. Thankfully there are people who realize what industrialization has done to the AIR, WATER and EARTH , and that our natural resources are finite, except hopefully the sun and wind keep on shinning and blowing.

Wait 'til you see the rest of this thread.

Get your tissues ready.

 

[healthmyths]

The politicization of the climate change issue is fueled more by the right, through corporate anti-environmentalist interests, motivated by profit,

than by anyone else.

What was Al Gore's net worth right after he left VP?
Former vice president Al Gore had a net worth of about $1.7 million at the turn of the century and 13 years later, his wealth has grown to more than $200 million.

Read more: Al Gore is Romney-Rich and grew his net worth by more than 200m in the last decade Daily Mail Online

 

[Nyvin]

3. Some science-history:
Some ground-floor geneticists claimed that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime were incorporated in their offspring.

a. Jean Baptiste Lamarck took a great conceptual step and proposed a full-blown theory of evolution, believing that the long necks of giraffes evolved as generations of giraffes reached for ever higher leaves. As each generation's neck increased in length, that trait served as a starting point for successive generation, and so on. Early Concepts of Evolution Jean Baptiste Lamarck

4. Friedrich Weismann disproved this thesis, operating from the other end: he cut the tails off multiple generations of mice, and showed that the result was not shorter tails in the subjects.
Leave it to a German to operate on helpless victims.

What the heck does this have to do with anything?

Anyway, even if you put the temperatures aside there's still plenty of evidence that the Earth is changing due to human activity. Killer Whales hunting in further and further northern regions displacing polar bears. Deciduous trees spreading further north. Fish migrations changing. Droughts, floods, intensity of hurricanes, greater storm surge.

The world is actually turning into a scary place. I personally don't think it's a good idea to ignore all of it.

Imagine what a threat you'd be if you actually had an education.

You might even reduce your hand-wringing, Chicken Little.

For edification:

In the 1860s, News England fishermen where aghast at the 'crisis' caused by net fisherman. The US Fish Commission concluded that netters were going to wipe out entire species of fish! The uproar caused Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island to institute regulations.

"“It’s interesting to see the quotes of the [historical] fishermen,” he says, but he cautions that the evidence is “very anecdotal”. Hiddink also highlights a different modern parallel: the nineteenth-century fishermen who used lines or pots blamed declining catches on those who trawled. “What is typical is the situation where the fishermen are all blaming each other.”
Fishermen Report on Catches from Beyond the Grave - Scientific American



"Despite the fact that the netting continued, the species came back in abundance. The protests had begun during a natural crash in fish populations. They faded out with the new population boom."
Kaufman, Op. Cit., chapter seven.


Dopes like you are exactly what the global warming con artists count on.

I have no idea why fish populations came into this...Let alone issues that arose in the 1860's. Either way if you want to go there I think bottom trawling is a horrible and destructive practice and should be done away with if possible without disrupting food supplies too much.

I don't see the last quote anywhere in the article you linked and have no clue what it's referencing.

I think dopes like you are the people big fossil fuel companies rely on.

edit: Here's a quote from your article:

“I think the message from the nineteenth century is that even low intensities of bottom trawling can very quickly alter seabed communities beyond recognition, and that fish abundance was being impacted even during the early days of industrialized fishing,” she says. “This heralds a stark warning for our fisheries today, particularly those which are expanding their efforts further offshore and to greater depths, as deep-sea communities are simply not able to recover rapidly from disturbances.”

 

[SwimExpert]

Thankfully there are people who realize what industrialization has done to the AIR, WATER and EARTH

By the way, you're using a computer.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Lamarck and Lysenko had far more in common than the first letter of their names. Both subscribed to the view that a change in somatic, body cells, would be passed on to the next generation.

Today, of course, scientists recognize that only changes in germ cells, reproductive cells, are inherited.


8." Trofim Lysenko became the Director of theSovietLenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciencesin the 1930s under Josef Stalin. [Lysenko]was an advocate of the theory that characteristics acquired by plants during their lives could be inherited by later generations stemming from the changed plants, which sharply contradicted Mendelian genetics. As a result, Lysenko became a fierce critic of theories of the then rising modern genetics."
Forbes, Op. Cit.


Surely Liberals, socialists, Progressives, will honor their familial relationship with Stalin and communism, and rush to honor Stalin's respect for science....


And from that, view Lysenko's views as simply one of those errors dedicated scientists make from time to time.


Or....was there a reason that communism found Lysenko's view so valuable?
And what did the totalitarian government do to support it?


Coming right up.

 

[healthmyths]

3. Some science-history:
Some ground-floor geneticists claimed that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime were incorporated in their offspring.

a. Jean Baptiste Lamarck took a great conceptual step and proposed a full-blown theory of evolution, believing that the long necks of giraffes evolved as generations of giraffes reached for ever higher leaves. As each generation's neck increased in length, that trait served as a starting point for successive generation, and so on. Early Concepts of Evolution Jean Baptiste Lamarck

4. Friedrich Weismann disproved this thesis, operating from the other end: he cut the tails off multiple generations of mice, and showed that the result was not shorter tails in the subjects.
Leave it to a German to operate on helpless victims.

What the heck does this have to do with anything?

Anyway, even if you put the temperatures aside there's still plenty of evidence that the Earth is changing due to human activity. Killer Whales hunting in further and further northern regions displacing polar bears. Deciduous trees spreading further north. Fish migrations changing. Droughts, floods, intensity of hurricanes, greater storm surge.

The world is actually turning into a scary place. I personally don't think it's a good idea to ignore all of it.

Imagine what a threat you'd be if you actually had an education.

You might even reduce your hand-wringing, Chicken Little.

For edification:

In the 1860s, News England fishermen where aghast at the 'crisis' caused by net fisherman. The US Fish Commission concluded that netters were going to wipe out entire species of fish! The uproar caused Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island to institute regulations.

"“It’s interesting to see the quotes of the [historical] fishermen,” he says, but he cautions that the evidence is “very anecdotal”. Hiddink also highlights a different modern parallel: the nineteenth-century fishermen who used lines or pots blamed declining catches on those who trawled. “What is typical is the situation where the fishermen are all blaming each other.”
Fishermen Report on Catches from Beyond the Grave - Scientific American



"Despite the fact that the netting continued, the species came back in abundance. The protests had begun during a natural crash in fish populations. They faded out with the new population boom."
Kaufman, Op. Cit., chapter seven.


Dopes like you are exactly what the global warming con artists count on.

I have no idea why fish populations came into this...Let alone issues that arose in the 1860's. Either way if you want to go there I think bottom trawling is a horrible and destructive practice and should be done away with if possible without disrupting food supplies too much.

I don't see the last quote anywhere in the article you linked and have no clue what it's referencing.

I think dopes like you are the people big fossil fuel companies rely on.

edit: Here's a quote from your article:

“I think the message from the nineteenth century is that even low intensities of bottom trawling can very quickly alter seabed communities beyond recognition, and that fish abundance was being impacted even during the early days of industrialized fishing,” she says. “This heralds a stark warning for our fisheries today, particularly those which are expanding their efforts further offshore and to greater depths, as deep-sea communities are simply not able to recover rapidly from disturbances.”

I really want to believe in global warming BUT I have a problem.
1) If global warming is happening NOW... why is there large oil deposits in the Arctic as it takes warm weather to grow plants that decompose to oil.
2) If global warming is happening why has 12.5% of the earth's land mass never been included in the land temperature reading stations for over 60 years?
3) If the temperatures are increasing why did NOAA remove 600 reading stations due to false readings?
4) If before digital thermometers people had to distinguish between 78° and 79° and then physically write the temperatures down which again were transcribed several
more times....all susceptible to human errors. Again before digital/satellites but these accumulated readings since 1880s is the basis for saying temperature is rising!

Answer me those questions that reflect on the realities i.e. decaying plant life transformed into oil is found in the Arctic how come?