The Political Might Of Adultery

Why are you still whining about this issue? You got what you wanted, gays can marry in all 50 states. So STFU, we're tired of you and your endless complaints that the world is not fair for gays.
 
Why are you still whining about this issue? You got what you wanted, gays can marry in all 50 states. So STFU, we're tired of you and your endless complaints that the world is not fair for gays.

The only whining is coming from dolts who have not yet gotten the message. Hypocrites like Kim Davis who will gladly give you a marriage license if you are a serial adulterer, but not if you are gay.

That's some serious political clout adultery has, wouldn't you say? It is so powerful, a person can actually claim to be defending the bible while handing out marriage licenses to adulterers!
 
It takes such courage to flame Christians in America in 2015.
It takes such courage to avoid attacking the tens and tens and tens and tens of millions of adulterers and go after gays.

That's how much political clout adultery has. A preacher running for President dares not to demand stopping adulterers from re-marrying in accordance with the Bible.

He is totally shut down and runs with the torch-carrying adulterous mob instead. Burning gay scapegoats.

That's some powerful clout adultery has. It has totally compromised men of the cloth!
 
That's why the anti-gay bigots have lost, you know. If they were actually upstanding and faithful to the Bible, there is nothing that would not yield to them.

Nothing.

Their sin and hypocrisy and adultery has taken them down. Their behaviors have destroyed marriage. Getting cash and prizes from the State has superseded God in their lives. They destroyed themselves.

Not gays.
 
Making gays the scapegoat would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

You mean like making rich people the scapegoat for people who don't work hard? Making the wealthy the scapegoat for people who don't save? Liberals have it all figured out, don't you?
So, if I agreed some made scapegoats of the rich would that make it ok to make scapegoats out of gays?

What a stupid question, there is no way to get that out of what I said. I don't think there's anything wrong with gays, Holmes, so no, it isn't.

I have never understood the socon's obsession with gays over other sins with actual victims even. But hypocrisy is still not a valid attack. It's either a standard or it isn't, to g5000 it isn't
But G5000 calls out dems on taking from some to give to others all the time. I think that's where I got my "stupid" comment. I'll refrain from calling you stupid, but it'd be valid in this instance.

I'd add that while I find the anti people to be bigots, the supreme court should have taken a pass to allow more public opinion to build in support of gay marriage.
 
Horaay, it's time for another gay thread!!! We never get tired of their endless bullshit!!ig

Check it out, idiot! Everything you mentioned is still considered a sin by the Catholic Church!!!

People who divorce and remarry are not allowed to take the Eucharist.

It doesn't matter that other churches allow divorce, they are wrong. Jesus' condemnation of divorce was very specific and cannot be wished away.
Let's go back to this.

In some churches, even in this modern age, you are not allowed to remarry if you divorce.

But you can still run down to the local courthouse and remarry.

If a church does not allow you to remarry, why do you run to the state to remarry you?

You do it because a state marriage has nothing to do with religion. You do it for the cash and prizes.

This proves the issue of gay marriage is a secular one, not a religious one. It is all about the State cash and prizes you get for being married in the eyes of the STATE, not the CHURCH.

And that is how adultery got its political might. By filthy lucre. That is how adultery hijacked marriage away from the church.

You destroyed yourselves on the golden calf. Gays didn't do it.
 
Last edited:
Clerk Kim Davis is on marriage four? Someone should have denied her a marriage license as obviously she isn't fit for the holy sacrament of marriage. :) Go forth Kim and sin no more.

"The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and three hundred sixty two admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision." Lynne Lavner

"The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst they said to him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?” This they said to test him, that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. And as they continued to ask him, he stood up and said to them, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.” And once more he bent down and wrote on the ground. But when they heard it, they went away one by one, beginning with the older ones, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. Jesus stood up and said to her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?” She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said, “Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more.”" John 8:3–11
 
There are no "cash and prizes from the State" when you marry. Remaining single is always a better deal, because you only have one person to support, yourself. The tax deduction for having dependents does not come even close to paying the real cot of having dependents.

You are a trouble maker, yelling and screaming over an issue that you have already won.

Game is over, take your ball and go home.
 
The Christian Bible speaks out against adultery more than it does homosexuality. Jesus even specifically condemns adultery and divorce:

I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

Jesus never addresses homosexuality.

Divorce used to be a scandal. Today, divorce is so common it has become not only socially acceptable, it has become a norm.

So how is it that gays end up as the political scapegoats for the utter ruination of the institution of marriage? What bizarro line of thinking led to the conclusion that homos will ruin an institution which collapsed a long, long time ago?

Why does the mob wave the Bible about when condemning gays, but fails to rail against the mass adultery going on?

When will the mob remember their Bible and start politically campaigning against divorce except in case of adultery? When will the mob remember their Bible and start politically campaigning for not allowing divorcees to re-marry?

Why do they only remember their Bible when ranting about the mote in their neighbor's eye and forget the Bible when it comes to the beam in their own?

Is it because the very people bashing gays over the head with the Bible are adulterers themselves? Hmmmm...

Premarital sex. Porn sites. Masturbation. All these other forms of adultery are also acceptable and a norm. All hugely violating the Bible.


Adultery, as defined by the Bible, has become so widespread and so rampant, it is now politically embedded into the very fabric of our country. No politician would dare go after the tens upon tens upon tens of millions of biblically-defined adulterers.

Evil has already won, kids. A long time ago. Wakey wakey.

The Bible has a lot to say about a people who have gone so far away from God.

Making gays the scapegoat would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
 
It takes such courage to flame Christians in America in 2015.
It takes such courage to avoid attacking the tens and tens and tens and tens of millions of adulterers and go after gays.

That's how much political clout adultery has. A preacher running for President dares not to demand stopping adulterers from re-marrying in accordance with the Bible.

He is totally shut down and runs with the torch-carrying adulterous mob instead. Burning gay scapegoats.

That's some powerful clout adultery has. It has totally compromised men of the cloth!

Riiiiight. All because one woman in a far away state is a Conscientious objector. That set off your Hypocrite Detector
 
Verily, you give voice to the mockery of the clerk languishing in chains. But, I still think the decision was wrong. The decision to ban gay marriage should only have had to pass the rational relationship. If some Kentucky bumpkin legislators from Bumpkinville thought that banning gays from marrying would save one or maybe three heteromarriages, then it should get a pass. Its simply not exactly like Loving. No one rationally thought all us white men were gonna dump our wives to jump on some black strange.

Where are all the clerks and judges "languishing in chains" for refusing to grant divorces? Also, languishing in chains? Purple prose at its best.

G5000s point still stands.
 
You can walk into any county clerk's office in America and get a marriage license, even if you are a serial adulterer by the Bible's standards.

That is some serious political clout right there.

You can be positively dripping with sin and vice, oozing brimstone, with a ginormous beam in your eye, and still get married.

And then you whine and moan if a gay couple asks to get married.

Serious, serious political clout.

In North Carolina if you cheat on your spouse they can sue your ass off, you can't sue people for being gay
Until recently, in North Carolina if you cheat on your spouse and they sue for divorce, you can get married again before the ink is even dry on the divorce papers. But you couldn't even get married once if you are gay.

That's some serious political clout adultery has.

You have to be separated for a year in virtually all cases before you can get divorced, so you can't sue for divorce then get married before the ink is dry then get married, sorry
 
Making gays the scapegoat would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

You mean like making rich people the scapegoat for people who don't work hard? Making the wealthy the scapegoat for people who don't save? Liberals have it all figured out, don't you?
So, if I agreed some made scapegoats of the rich would that make it ok to make scapegoats out of gays?

What a stupid question, there is no way to get that out of what I said. I don't think there's anything wrong with gays, Holmes, so no, it isn't.

I have never understood the socon's obsession with gays over other sins with actual victims even. But hypocrisy is still not a valid attack. It's either a standard or it isn't, to g5000 it isn't
But G5000 calls out dems on taking from some to give to others all the time. I think that's where I got my "stupid" comment. I'll refrain from calling you stupid, but it'd be valid in this instance.

I'd add that while I find the anti people to be bigots, the supreme court should have taken a pass to allow more public opinion to build in support of gay marriage.

He does "all the time?" LOL, I'd be addressing your own stupid issues before worrying about anyone else.

The thing with liberals is that you're constantly using bigotry while decrying bigotry. It's a shallow argument even on the issues that you're right about when you don't really mean it
 
It takes such courage to flame Christians in America in 2015.
It takes such courage to avoid attacking the tens and tens and tens and tens of millions of adulterers and go after gays.

That's how much political clout adultery has. A preacher running for President dares not to demand stopping adulterers from re-marrying in accordance with the Bible.

He is totally shut down and runs with the torch-carrying adulterous mob instead. Burning gay scapegoats.

That's some powerful clout adultery has. It has totally compromised men of the cloth!

Riiiiight. All because one woman in a far away state is a Conscientious objector. That set off your Hypocrite Detector
Nope. What set of my Hypocrite Detector were all the people who bowed down and worshipped her. I bet most of them are adulterers as defined in the bible.

I for sure have never heard a single one of them demand divorcees not be allowed to marry.
 
There are no "cash and prizes from the State" when you marry.
An Overview of Federal Rights Granted to Married Couples

7 Tax Advantages of Getting Married - TurboTax Tax Tips & Videos

List of 1,138 Federal Rights, Benefits, and Privileges of Marriage

This is why adulterers rush to the State to get married even when their church won't marry them. This is how adulterers hijacked marriage away from the church.
Your list doesn't include the "marriage penalty" which adds the income of husband and wife together to figure out income tax rate. The government is actually penalizing people who get married.

How Much the Marriage Tax Penalty Will Cost You
 

Forum List

Back
Top