The Past, and Our Possible Future

[PoliticalChic]

The members of the "Fake News and Coastal Party," the Democrats never require evidence, and that applies to dispositive graph in the OP.

".... the edu-crat lobby acts as if evidence doesn’t matter. At the national level, the state level, and the local level, the drumbeat is the same: Give us more money if you care about kids.

I can’t imagine anyone looking at his chart and not immediately realizing that you don’t get better results by pouring more money into the government’s education monopoly.

....look back at the progress we’ve made under reformers’ traditional response to fixing low-performing schools – simply showering them with more money – makes it clear that this approach has been a costly failure.

...public schools increased their staff by 386 percent – four times the increase in students. The number of teachers increased by 252 percent, over 2.5 times the increase in students. The number of administrators and other staff increased by over seven times the increase in students. …This staffing surge still exists today."
The Failure of Public Schooling in One Chart | Daniel J. Mitchell


The failure of Liberalism has been recounted in almost every area.
Both the presidency, and in education.....

....shining examples.

 

[JQPublic1]

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

you mean right after segregation ended? gee I wonder why? lol CATO institute isn't even trying anymore

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

It would be a lot worse if white people were as racial in their immediate actions and thinking as minorities are.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

"...a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males."

And the poster child for the DNC has checked.


What a moron.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

 

[initforme]

Get rid of the pledge of allegiance being said every day. Talk about indoctrination. My granddaughter says it every morning....doest seem right.

 

[initforme]

Keep private businesses that make billions on standardized testing out. They have no business in public education.

 

[JQPublic1]

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

you mean right after segregation ended? gee I wonder why? lol CATO institute isn't even trying anymore

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

It would be a lot worse if white people were as racial in their immediate actions and thinking as minorities are.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

You are literally more racist than the caricature you paint of Trump voters, you are just too stupid and blinded by hate to realize it.

If white people rioted every time they were slighted, this entire country would be up in flames literally tomorrow.

Don't be silly. As long as the middle class exists, Large numbers of White people aren't going to riot. Well, then again, some might have if Hillary had been elected.
And in case you didn't know it, most Blacks don't riot either. I know it seems that way because he media wants you to believe Blacks riot en masse, as a mindless monolithic entity. See how devious your mind is, creating the faceless mysterious universal Black rioter who is constantly a threat to your way of life. With that kind of fear mongering so widespread in your communities it is little wonder you feel safer with a bigot as president.

 

[depotoo]

Only by those that have an issue with different colors. You forget-internally, we are all the same, externally, all but the skin.

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

you mean right after segregation ended? gee I wonder why? lol CATO institute isn't even trying anymore

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Only by those that have an issue with different colors. You forget-internally, we are all the same, externally, all but the skin.

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

you mean right after segregation ended? gee I wonder why? lol CATO institute isn't even trying anymore

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

That poster is simply a brain-dead wind-up doll, trained by the Democrats.

And here is the reason:

... the Dems can't take a chance on losing the black constituency....so, here we are.
They're pretty much saddled with this donkey.


"...what would happen if a smaller percentage of blacks turned out:

- At 90 percent black turn-out, Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes slide into the GOP column.

- At 75 percent black turn-out, Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes go Republican.

- At 70 percent Michigan’s 17 electoral votes turn from blue to red.

- At 50 percent the GOP collects Delawre’s three electoral votes.

I don’t know what a realistic number to project is for the effects of angry black apathy, but I’ll stop at 50 percent. It may be that going as low as 75 percent is unrealistic. Most likely it’s impossible to say. (And this doesn’t take into account things like congressional districts where black voters make the margin of difference.)"
Do Democrats need the black vote? | RobertEmmet


And so, they teach their slaves to smear the white population, hoping that that will energize the black vote.

Didn't work, did it.

 

[ptbw forever]

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

It would be a lot worse if white people were as racial in their immediate actions and thinking as minorities are.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

"...a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males."

And the poster child for the DNC has checked.


What a moron.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

 

[ptbw forever]

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

It would be a lot worse if white people were as racial in their immediate actions and thinking as minorities are.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

You are literally more racist than the caricature you paint of Trump voters, you are just too stupid and blinded by hate to realize it.

If white people rioted every time they were slighted, this entire country would be up in flames literally tomorrow.

Don't be silly. As long as the middle class exists, Large numbers of White people aren't going to riot. Well, then again, some might have if Hillary had been elected.
And in case you didn't know it, most Blacks don't riot either. I know it seems that way because he media wants you to believe Blacks riot en masse, as a mindless monolithic entity. See how devious your mind is, creating the faceless mysterious universal Black rioter who is constantly a threat to your way of life. With that kind of fear mongering so widespread in your communities it is little wonder you feel safer with a bigot as president.

White intellectual right wing populists are more than ready to riot the minute this country sinks below the tipping point(which would have been the moment any Democrat won the presidency and the congress during a time when America and the west was already knocked down from a previous disaster(Obama)) , that is 100s of thousands of people spread to every state in the union. Obama's and the MSM's racism has woken more white people up to the reality of their situation than any Nazi could ever dream of and it only going to get worse for you assholes.

 

[depotoo]

It is offensive you don't see through the haze.
It was instigated by white Dems and progressives, and paid for by the same. Those whites create imaginary divisions to suit their need for votes. Blame the real culprits.

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

It would be a lot worse if white people were as racial in their immediate actions and thinking as minorities are.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

"...a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males."

And the poster child for the DNC has checked.


What a moron.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

 

[ptbw forever]

It is offensive you don't see through the haze.
It was instigated by white Dems and progressives, and paid for by the same. Those whites create imaginary divisions to suit their need for votes. Blame the real culprits.

It would be a lot worse if white people were as racial in their immediate actions and thinking as minorities are.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

"...a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males."

And the poster child for the DNC has checked.


What a moron.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

Instigated, yes. Created, no.

There are many more fascist minorities who use the masochism and weakness of the white left than you would ever want to know.

 

[depotoo]

That's what the white left wants you to think. You fell for it.

It is offensive you don't see through the haze.
It was instigated by white Dems and progressives, and paid for by the same. Those whites create imaginary divisions to suit their need for votes. Blame the real culprits.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

"...a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males."

And the poster child for the DNC has checked.


What a moron.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

Instigated, yes. Created, no.

There are many more fascist minorities who use the masochism and weakness of the white left than you would ever want to know.

 

[ptbw forever]

That's what the white left wants you to think. You fell for it.

It is offensive you don't see through the haze.
It was instigated by white Dems and progressives, and paid for by the same. Those whites create imaginary divisions to suit their need for votes. Blame the real culprits.

"...a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males."

And the poster child for the DNC has checked.


What a moron.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

Instigated, yes. Created, no.

There are many more fascist minorities who use the masochism and weakness of the white left than you would ever want to know.

Fascist minorities want you to think only white people are capable of evil, and you most definitely fell for it.

The white left is largely a powerless and clueless bunch of retards who hang out on cuckold sites on the weekends.

 

[depotoo]

No, it is a minority.
And you reallllly need to do some research. Since the days of old, the white Dems are manipulating. And one of the Nazi's own protege is at the helm

That's what the white left wants you to think. You fell for it.

It is offensive you don't see through the haze.
It was instigated by white Dems and progressives, and paid for by the same. Those whites create imaginary divisions to suit their need for votes. Blame the real culprits.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

Instigated, yes. Created, no.

There are many more fascist minorities who use the masochism and weakness of the white left than you would ever want to know.

Fascist minorities want you to think only white people are capable of evil, and you most definitely fell for it.

The white left is largely a powerless and clueless bunch of retards who hang out on cuckold sites on the weekends.

 

[ptbw forever]

No, it is a minority.
And you reallllly need to do some research. Since the days of old, the white Dems are manipulating. And one of the Nazi's own protege is at the helm

That's what the white left wants you to think. You fell for it.

It is offensive you don't see through the haze.
It was instigated by white Dems and progressives, and paid for by the same. Those whites create imaginary divisions to suit their need for votes. Blame the real culprits.

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

Instigated, yes. Created, no.

There are many more fascist minorities who use the masochism and weakness of the white left than you would ever want to know.

Fascist minorities want you to think only white people are capable of evil, and you most definitely fell for it.

The white left is largely a powerless and clueless bunch of retards who hang out on cuckold sites on the weekends.

Hillary Clinton is literally the beginning of the end for the white left, that is why Keith Ellison(black supremacist) will most likely be the DNC chair(at the behest of the remaining powers of the white left).

YOU are being manipulated by the white left to think lower of yourself and your people than you do of minorities. Minorities can be and ARE racist, and racist minorities ALWAYS vote Democrat( with the expressed goal of using the power and the agenda of the Democrats to destroy white people).

 

[JQPublic1]

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

It would be a lot worse if white people were as racial in their immediate actions and thinking as minorities are.

The election of Trump has every potential for making your statement prophetic. I think it is safe to say that a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males. Now that Trump has emerged as the Great White Hope, hate crimes are on the increase. The lowest most hatefull common denominators of "Whiteness" have been emboldened ...and they are armed and dangerous.

"...a little less than half of White people in the USA are potentially violent racists.Virtually all of them are RW White males."

And the poster child for the DNC has checked.


What a moron.

I expected to called something far worse. I wouldn't expect less from someone who inevitably resorts to salty "trailer park" rhetoric when the copy and paste material doesn't cover a point in dispute.. You can't deny the historical precedence from which my premise was drawn. When Populism topples the established order the future emanating from that event can be disastrous for millions.

Hitler expanded the German welfare state. His rearmament and public works programs ended mass unemployment. (Remember, Nazi was an abbreviation for national socialist.) Hitler recycled the plunder looted from Jews and later from countries the Nazis occupied — to improve living standards of ordinary Germans. He probably could have gotten re-elected, had he not suspended free elections and civil liberties. Historian Aly’s point is that ordinary Germans, as willing beneficiaries, were culpable.

This is not, of course, to excuse Hitler. Or to suggest that Donald Trump is a fascist. Not all rightwing populists are as extreme as Hitler.

This brings me to the difference between rightwing populists and conservatives.
Far right populists share with today’s Republicans a fanatic ultra-nationalism, a scapegoating of foreigners, and a distaste for identity politics.

But there are several big differences. Conservatives are intimate allies of Wall Street while populists play on the resentment of Wall Street.

Populists tend not to be religious fundamentalists, while rightwing Republicans pander to the religious right. And the Republican right loathes government, while populists are willing to use it. If you think Obama expanded executive power, just wait for President Trump.
Trump, Berlusconi, Hitler and the Populist Moment | The Huffington Post

Obama was a direct result of fanatic ultra-nationalism from blacks and Hispanics, just as the entirety of the Democratic Party has been since the 90s.

Your desire to racialize the political spectrum is very fascist in its nature.

Hitler is the reason anyone cares about Germany at all btw. Germans greatly benefitted from Hitler's economic policies and the instilled sense of pride that he gave them.

You RW "conservatives' have grown quite fond of Hitler and Putin.Communism and socialism is ok as long as 'Whiteness" is upheld. It is as if White nations are putting ideological differences aside for the higher purpose of joining forces against the global majority: People of color! Trump's history is punctuated by racial bias

For me to ignore that would be a disservice to the majority of voters who voted against Donald Trump.

 

[JQPublic1]

Only by those that have an issue with different colors. You forget-internally, we are all the same, externally, all but the skin.

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

you mean right after segregation ended? gee I wonder why? lol CATO institute isn't even trying anymore

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

That poster is simply a brain-dead wind-up doll, trained by the Democrats.

And here is the reason:

... the Dems can't take a chance on losing the black constituency....so, here we are.
They're pretty much saddled with this donkey.


"...what would happen if a smaller percentage of blacks turned out:

- At 90 percent black turn-out, Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes slide into the GOP column.

- At 75 percent black turn-out, Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes go Republican.

- At 70 percent Michigan’s 17 electoral votes turn from blue to red.

- At 50 percent the GOP collects Delawre’s three electoral votes.

I don’t know what a realistic number to project is for the effects of angry black apathy, but I’ll stop at 50 percent. It may be that going as low as 75 percent is unrealistic. Most likely it’s impossible to say. (And this doesn’t take into account things like congressional districts where black voters make the margin of difference.)"
Do Democrats need the black vote? | RobertEmmet


And so, they teach their slaves to smear the white population, hoping that that will energize the black vote.

Didn't work, did it.

My, you ARE a nasty woman. Either you are part of the propaganda machine that helped to suppress minority votes or you are a just another wild eyed kool-aid drinker.

You just gloss over the mounting evidence indicating vast voter suppression by the GOP as if it is a non-issue. What group of voters wouldn't be angry after discovering the GOP had robbed them of their Constitutional right to vote through skulduggery? You would be angry too! But the backlash isn't coming from just Black voters. A vastly larger coalition of disenfranchised Whites, Blacks and other minorities will make their angst known very soon.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Only by those that have an issue with different colors. You forget-internally, we are all the same, externally, all but the skin.

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

you mean right after segregation ended? gee I wonder why? lol CATO institute isn't even trying anymore

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

That poster is simply a brain-dead wind-up doll, trained by the Democrats.

And here is the reason:

... the Dems can't take a chance on losing the black constituency....so, here we are.
They're pretty much saddled with this donkey.


"...what would happen if a smaller percentage of blacks turned out:

- At 90 percent black turn-out, Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes slide into the GOP column.

- At 75 percent black turn-out, Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes go Republican.

- At 70 percent Michigan’s 17 electoral votes turn from blue to red.

- At 50 percent the GOP collects Delawre’s three electoral votes.

I don’t know what a realistic number to project is for the effects of angry black apathy, but I’ll stop at 50 percent. It may be that going as low as 75 percent is unrealistic. Most likely it’s impossible to say. (And this doesn’t take into account things like congressional districts where black voters make the margin of difference.)"
Do Democrats need the black vote? | RobertEmmet


And so, they teach their slaves to smear the white population, hoping that that will energize the black vote.

Didn't work, did it.

My, you ARE a nasty woman. Either you are part of the propaganda machine that helped to suppress minority votes or you are a just another wild eyed kool-aid drinker.

You just gloss over the mounting evidence indicating vast voter suppression by the GOP as if it is a non-issue. What group of voters wouldn't be angry after discovering the GOP had robbed them of their Constitutional right to vote through skulduggery? You would be angry too! But the backlash isn't coming from just Black voters. A vastly larger coalition of disenfranchised Whites, Blacks and other minorities will make their angst known very soon.

1. Nasty? That's how you refer to 'truthful'?
2.'vast voter suppression '
Studies have found it doesn't exist.
3.'the mounting evidence'
Yet, you couldn't find any.
Possibly because you are a brain-dead dunce.
Could be?


"Although liberal media support the old wives tale of GOP voter suppression by requiring identification, careful analysis shows a quite different reality:


“The findings of this analysis suggest that voter identification requirements, such as requiring non-photo and photo identification, have virtually no suppressive effect on reported voter turnout.

Controlling for factors that influence voter turnout, states with stricter voter identification laws largely do not have the claimed negative impact on voter turnout when compared to states with more lenient voter identification laws.

Based on the Eagleton Institute's findings, some members of the media have claimed that voter identification law suppress voter turnout, especially among minorities.[80] Their conclusion is unfounded. When statistically significant and negative relationships are found in our analysis, the effects are so small that the findings offer little policy significance.

More important, minority respondents in states that required photo identification are just as likely to report voting as are minority respondents from states that only required voters to say their name.”

For a thorough statistical analysis of the effect of voter identification requirements:
http://www.heritage.org/research/LegalIssues/cda07-04.cfm


Summary:

Both of these fabrications are produced by the Leftist/Democrats/Liberals:
a. voter suppression
b. institutional racism in the US.

Much like your IQ....neither exists.

 

[JQPublic1]

Only by those that have an issue with different colors. You forget-internally, we are all the same, externally, all but the skin.

Those that see race in everything are the actual racists...

Those that ignore the racial connections to everything is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. Property values, white flight, social legislation and every aspect of American life has some racial component to it. That component might be well hidden but it is there.

That poster is simply a brain-dead wind-up doll, trained by the Democrats.

And here is the reason:

... the Dems can't take a chance on losing the black constituency....so, here we are.
They're pretty much saddled with this donkey.


"...what would happen if a smaller percentage of blacks turned out:

- At 90 percent black turn-out, Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes slide into the GOP column.

- At 75 percent black turn-out, Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes go Republican.

- At 70 percent Michigan’s 17 electoral votes turn from blue to red.

- At 50 percent the GOP collects Delawre’s three electoral votes.

I don’t know what a realistic number to project is for the effects of angry black apathy, but I’ll stop at 50 percent. It may be that going as low as 75 percent is unrealistic. Most likely it’s impossible to say. (And this doesn’t take into account things like congressional districts where black voters make the margin of difference.)"
Do Democrats need the black vote? | RobertEmmet


And so, they teach their slaves to smear the white population, hoping that that will energize the black vote.

Didn't work, did it.

My, you ARE a nasty woman. Either you are part of the propaganda machine that helped to suppress minority votes or you are a just another wild eyed kool-aid drinker.

You just gloss over the mounting evidence indicating vast voter suppression by the GOP as if it is a non-issue. What group of voters wouldn't be angry after discovering the GOP had robbed them of their Constitutional right to vote through skulduggery? You would be angry too! But the backlash isn't coming from just Black voters. A vastly larger coalition of disenfranchised Whites, Blacks and other minorities will make their angst known very soon.

1. Nasty? That's how you refer to 'truthful'?
2.'vast voter suppression '
Studies have found it doesn't exist.
3.'the mounting evidence'
Yet, you couldn't find any.
Possibly because you are a brain-dead dunce.
Could be?


"Although liberal media support the old wives tale of GOP voter suppression by requiring identification, careful analysis shows a quite different reality:


“The findings of this analysis suggest that voter identification requirements, such as requiring non-photo and photo identification, have virtually no suppressive effect on reported voter turnout.

Controlling for factors that influence voter turnout, states with stricter voter identification laws largely do not have the claimed negative impact on voter turnout when compared to states with more lenient voter identification laws.

Based on the Eagleton Institute's findings, some members of the media have claimed that voter identification law suppress voter turnout, especially among minorities.[80] Their conclusion is unfounded. When statistically significant and negative relationships are found in our analysis, the effects are so small that the findings offer little policy significance.

More important, minority respondents in states that required photo identification are just as likely to report voting as are minority respondents from states that only required voters to say their name.”

For a thorough statistical analysis of the effect of voter identification requirements:
http://www.heritage.org/research/LegalIssues/cda07-04.cfm


Summary:

Both of these fabrications are produced by the Leftist/Democrats/Liberals:
a. voter suppression
b. institutional racism in the US.

Much like your IQ....neither exists.

YOUR Nastiness:

The infamy associated with your nastiness is known throughout the forums of USMB. There is nothing truthful about it. Some of your cut and pasted excerpts may have some modicum of validity but your nastiness is a separate thing. Don't even try to combine the two. I won't allow it.

Your Source:

Whenever I see the name heritage .org or heritage foundation used in a citation or link I know the poster's mouth has a purple ring around it from drinking their Kool-Aid. Nice people call it a think tank, but in reality the Heritage foundation is an organization with an agenda that threatens us all:

'The Heritage Foundation, a massive marketing and lobbying force for right-wing policies that is likely to have huge influence in the Trump administration, has launched a new initiative designed to roll back the power of the federal government’s regulatory agencies. Today’s event announcing the new initiative featured remarks by Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, who believes that much of what the federal government does today is unconstitutional.

Even as Heritage staffers prepare to funnel right-wing ideologues into influential positions in executive branch agencies, its new project will seek to dramatically reduce the power of those agencies to act to protect the rights, safety and interests of individuals and communities.'

A question of IQ:

Any one with a reasonably high IQ having a love for fresh air and clean water would be wary of supporting an organization bent on deregulating industrial polluters. Dismantling the EPA would be tantamount to a sacrilege. But you low IQ Kool-Aid drinkers on the right have abandoned your morality as well as your humanity. For validation of that truth, one need look no further than the current President Elect. He can say or do anything as long as he projects the idea that he is one of YOU low information trolls. Tradition and mortality be damned. All the money in the world doesn't bring class. You and your leader are devoid of both class and high IQ. An Idiot Savant might be good at making money but he is still an idiot.

The truth:

That which I have posted above is public knowledge. There is no hidden message there . I purposely constructed my premise to reflect easy verifiable data concerning the environment and the impact your GOP fellas are about to have on it. But it doesn't stop there. If the past history of Republican administrations is any indicator defense spending and war is inevitable. The state of the union is imperiled like never before because the GOP dominates the entire government.
God help us all!

 

[JQPublic1]

"Although liberal media support the old wives tale of GOP voter suppression by requiring identification, careful analysis shows a quite different reality:


“The findings of this analysis suggest that voter identification requirements, such as requiring non-photo and photo identification, have virtually no suppressive effect on reported voter turnout.

One more thing:

A word about voter suppression:

Your handlers have not allowed you to wander too far off the idiot farm have they? I suppose they couldn't have a sheep like ewe grazing in pastures filled with enlightenment. But I will feed you...C'mere gal!

Reports of voter suppression have been rumored for years in the south and mid west but a North Carolina appeals court illuminated the practice like a flare shot overhead on a dark night illuminates the terrain below. here is what a federal court thought of your "old wives tale.":

"A three-judge panel of the U.S Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit has found North Carolina's controversial GOP-backed voting restrictions were intended to discriminate against African American voters.

The Friday ruling is a huge win for voting rights activists in a closely watched case in a potential 2016 swing state. The appeals court reversed the ruling of a district court siding with the state.

"In holding that the legislature did not enact the challenged provisions with
discriminatory intent, the court seems to have missed the forest in carefully surveying the many trees," the opinion said. It permanently blocked provisions in a 2013 North Carolina law that required certain photo IDs to vote, limited early voting, eliminated same day registration, ended out-of-precinct voting and prohibited pre-registration of young voters.

In the opinion, the panel of judges said that the law restricted voting in ways that "disproportionately affected African Americans" and that its provisions targeted "African Americans with almost surgical precision." It said the state's defense of the law was "meager."

Federal Appeals Court Rules New NC Voting Laws Intended To Discriminate


That one case blew the lid off the pot but it wasn't enough. The republicans came up with Crosscheck: a devious system that disenfranchised thousands of legitimate democrat voters with common names such as Jimmy smith, Juan Martinez .Maria Garza or Chin Lee!

Greg Palast wrote:
"
My testimony was that the data we received from the Crosscheck Program showed that in the 2012 general election, there were 35,750 people who voted in North Carolina whose first and last names and dates of birth matched persons who voted in the same election in another state.”] Yet despite hiring an ex-FBI agent to lead the hunt, the state has charged exactly zero double voters from the Crosscheck list. Nevertheless, tens of thousands face the loss of their ability to vote – all for the sake of preventing a crime that rarely happens. So far, Crosscheck has tagged an astonishing 7.2 million suspects, yet we found no more than four perpetrators who have been charged with double voting or deliberate double registration."