OK, so we have Palestine, a successor state broken from Turkish rule by the treaty of Lausanne and international borders were defined by post war treaties. According to the Treaty of Lausanne, international and domestic law, the Palestinians obtained the nationality of Palestinian and became citizens of that defined territory. As citizens of Palestine they have the right to self determination without external interference, etc, as affirmed by subsequent UN resolutions.Giving what to both of them?The Jews were to live in Palestine, with the Palestinians, as Palestinian citizens.
There was nothing about Israel, Jewish state, or exclusive rights.
Even if this is true (and its obviously not), as you continually point out -- the INTENT of the Mandate was to allow the inhabitants to develop their own governments and their own independence. That includes ALL the inhabitants. Even if the intent was for the Jewish people and the Palestinian people to co-govern a bi-national state, that's not the way it fell out. Each group wants its own self-determination. The two are essentially incompatible.
So what's the big deal about giving it to both of them?
National self-determination. A nation for each of them.
OK, your turn.
WRONG as it was not mentioned in the treaty of Lausanne, in fact it was not mentioned other than as an area in which the Jewish national home was to be built. The arab muslim refused to be part of this and as such lost the right to live in Jewish Palestine. The Jews now have a defined nationality under International law, within defined borders and have the right to self determination without external influence.
WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO WIPE OUT THE JEWS, DESTROY THEIR NATION AND REMOVE THEIR INALIENABLE RIGHTS TO SELF DETERMINATION AS DEFINED BY THE U.N. CHARTER WHICH IS INTERNATIONAL LAW.