How do you fit that into my post?OK, so we have Palestine, a successor state broken from Turkish rule by the treaty of Lausanne and international borders were defined by post war treaties. According to the Treaty of Lausanne, international and domestic law, the Palestinians obtained the nationality of Palestinian and became citizens of that defined territory. As citizens of Palestine they have the right to self determination without external interference, etc, as affirmed by subsequent UN resolutions.
OK, your turn.
There were two distinct groups of citizens living in the Mandate territory. One of those groups was granted explicit right to reconstitute their national home there based on recognition of a pre-existing historical right to it. That would be the Jewish people, explicitly mentioned in all sorts of documents of the era.
Now, I'm arguing for BOTH peoples rights.
What is your reason for excluding the rights of the Jewish people, especially in light of the explicit documentation?
Very easily as you never mention the rights of the Jews to self determination with no outside influence. You see the Jews being ruled by the muslims with no self determination and ruled by outside influence