Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
As long as the have the evidence and can support it, it should be allowed.They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
As long as the have the evidence and can support it, it should be allowed.They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
Justice Roberts will deny all evidence that is hearsay under federal evidence rules. This will render all evidence of second and third hand null. The only Fact Witness (first hand knowledge) will be Sondland. This is going nowhere and will be very short.
As long as the have the evidence and can support it, it should be allowed.They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
Justice Roberts will deny all evidence that is hearsay under federal evidence rules. This will render all evidence of second and third hand null. The only Fact Witness (first hand knowledge) will be Sondland. This is going nowhere and will be very short.
Care to place a little wager on what is allowed as evidence?
As long as the have the evidence and can support it, it should be allowed.They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
Justice Roberts will deny all evidence that is hearsay under federal evidence rules. This will render all evidence of second and third hand null. The only Fact Witness (first hand knowledge) will be Sondland. This is going nowhere and will be very short.
Care to place a little wager on what is allowed as evidence?
Not with you.... I already have a wager with friends over this and only one is expecting anything other than first hand evidence.
So if Russia sent you money you would say no? LolOAN. The only network whose reporters also admit to being on Russia's payroll. You got a real winner there dumb ass,
As long as the have the evidence and can support it, it should be allowed.They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
Justice Roberts will deny all evidence that is hearsay under federal evidence rules. This will render all evidence of second and third hand null. The only Fact Witness (first hand knowledge) will be Sondland. This is going nowhere and will be very short.
Care to place a little wager on what is allowed as evidence?
Not with you.... I already have a wager with friends over this and only one is expecting anything other than first hand evidence.
Chicken?
As long as the have the evidence and can support it, it should be allowed.They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
Justice Roberts will deny all evidence that is hearsay under federal evidence rules. This will render all evidence of second and third hand null. The only Fact Witness (first hand knowledge) will be Sondland. This is going nowhere and will be very short.
Care to place a little wager on what is allowed as evidence?
Not with you.... I already have a wager with friends over this and only one is expecting anything other than first hand evidence.
Chicken?
LOL
Thats all you got....??
Chief Justice John Roberts will strictly adhere to the federal rules of evidence. I wont waste my time with your drivel..
Lol Russian payroll what does that even mean? LolSo if Russia sent you money you would say no? LolOAN. The only network whose reporters also admit to being on Russia's payroll. You got a real winner there dumb ass,
You're really trying to justify a news reporter being on Russian payroll. That's as stupid as something Trump might do.
No, the Republicans would not be stupid enough to present OAN as a credible source of anything.They filmed killer evidence in the Ukraine sworn under oath in conjunction with Guiliani and Graham is trying to get the rights to enter the evidence into the impeachment case. But if that happens much of the D leadership in the house might not be available for the impeachment or even in jail for soliciting perjury. How will that work out?
she does kick butt but the MSM will ignore her.I mentioned the OANN reporter in 2 other threads. I know it will be used as evidence in any Senate trial and will be used to summon other witnesses. If it's useful then the reporter, Chanel Rion, deserves a Pulitzer Prize.
When did they do that? Can you please provide a reference?OAN. The only network whose reporters also admit to being on Russia's payroll. You got a real winner there dumb ass,
When did they do that? Can you please provide a reference?OAN. The only network whose reporters also admit to being on Russia's payroll. You got a real winner there dumb ass,
On of their on air reporters is on the Kremlin payroll.When did they do that? Can you please provide a reference?OAN. The only network whose reporters also admit to being on Russia's payroll. You got a real winner there dumb ass,
