the mind of a communist

[Political Junky]

Liberal = Socialist = Communist = Marxist = Progressive = Fascist

The equivalency is undeniable. Now if only we had enough vowels to make a snappy acronym out of that truth.

Bull Shit.
Cons think they can rewrite history.

Sorry, let me fix that for you.

Cons think they can FIX THE REWRITE LIBS DID TO history IN ORDER TO HIDE THEIR TRUE NATURE.

Okay, now it reads right.

oh... and you're right. we will fix it.

"The Liberal State is a mask behind which there is no face; it is a scaffolding behind which there is no building."
- Benito Mussolini
>
Hitler agreed with Mussolini. They hated Liberalism. Socialism was proposed by Lenin, a Jew. They both despised Jews.

 

[Big Fitz]

Bull Shit.
Cons think they can rewrite history.

Sorry, let me fix that for you.

Cons think they can FIX THE REWRITE LIBS DID TO history IN ORDER TO HIDE THEIR TRUE NATURE.

Okay, now it reads right.

oh... and you're right. we will fix it.

"The Liberal State is a mask behind which there is no face; it is a scaffolding behind which there is no building."
- Benito Mussolini
>
Hitler agreed with Mussolini. They hated Liberalism. Socialism was proposed by Lenin, a Jew. They both despised Jews.

and yet every policy they made was right in line with the leftists they hated so.

You see, they were autocrats who just wanted to be the ones in CHARGE of the leftist ideology not truely subject to it. It all still boils down to state control of EVERYTHING. Either directly or by coercion.

 

[Political Junky]

ONe wonders why a group of right wingers, admiring Hitler and Mussolini, planned a Coup to overthrow FDR in 1934. The plot was stopped by Smedley Butler.
Smedley Butler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In early 1934, Butler alleged the existence of a political conspiracy of Wall Street interests to overthrow President Roosevelt, a series of allegations that came to be known in the media as the Business Plot.[51] In March 1934, the House of Representatives authorized investigations into his allegations by a special committee headed by John W. McCormack of Massachusetts and Samuel Dickstein of New York. The McCormack-Dickstein committee was a precursor to the House Committee on Un-American Activities.[52]

In November 1934, Butler told the committee that a group of businessmen, claiming to be backed by a private army of 500,000 ex-soldiers and others, intended to establish a fascist dictatorship. Butler had been asked to lead it, he said, by Gerald P. MacGuire, a bond salesman with Grayson M–P Murphy & Co. The New York Times reported that Butler had told friends that General Hugh S. Johnson, a former official with the National Recovery Administration, was to be installed as dictator. Butler said MacGuire had told him the attempted coup was backed by three million dollars, and that the 500,000 men were probably to be assembled in Washington, D.C. the following year. All the parties alleged to be involved, including Johnson, said there was no truth in the story, calling it a joke and a fantasy.[52]

When the committee's final report was released, the Times said the committee "purported to report that a two-month investigation had convinced it that General Butler's story of a Fascist march on Washington was alarmingly true" and "... also alleged that definite proof had been found that the much publicized Fascist march on Washington, which was to have been led by Major. Gen. Smedley D. Butler, retired, according to testimony at a hearing, was actually contemplated".[59]

The McCormack-Dickstein Committee, which was a precursor to the House Un-American Activities Committee, confirmed some of Butler's accusations in its final report. "In the last few weeks of the committee's official life it received evidence showing that certain persons had made an attempt to establish a fascist organization in this country...There is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient."[60] [n 1][n

 

[Big Fitz]

Doesn't disprove a damn thing. This coup attempt was being planned by fascists who have always warred against communists then went out and did the same things, except with the trappings of private enterprise. But as Mussolini explains about Corporatism, which he believed the true name for fascism, was about co-opting the corporations and bringing them into the state fold for control.

A distinction without a meaning for the results were always the same, regardless of how they were applied.

 

[JBeukema]

Huggy, define: family

What is the definition of "is" again?

Please. More hair splitting and distinctions without meanings?

You realize that the definition and form of the family unit has changed over time, right?.

lol at fitz getting mad at the facts

 

[JBeukema]

What is the definition of "is" again?

Please. More hair splitting and distinctions without meanings?

You realize that the definition and form of the family unit has changed over time, right?

Until recently, extended families were treated as a unit. More recently in the US, the nuclear family became

-you know what, I don't know why I even bother with you idiots.

Please.... we sane people would LOVE for you to stop bothering with us, go back to your unabomber style shack and keep writing that manifesto on an old underwood you KNOW isn't part of the capitalist evil empire.

Enjoy your reciprocal negrep, Sally Frillypants.

so the form of the family unit hasn't changed over the course of human history?

 

[editec]

All the self proclaiming American communists I know are scions of great wealth.

They are to the man nothing but check-cashing trust-funders.

 

[antagon]

All the self proclaiming American communists I know are scions of great wealth.

They are to the man nothing but check-cashing trust-funders.

this is funny. the few commies i've known over the years have been along these lines, too. conversely, i have also known the hippy type who sleeps outside and eats what grocery stores throw out.

it has to do with not being a real part of american society, which certainly doesn't preclude the inherited rich.

 

[editec]

Who else but a trust funder scion OR somebody who has totally rejected materialism can AFFORD to be a commie in this society?

 

[antagon]

You realize that the definition and form of the family unit has changed over time, right?

Until recently, extended families were treated as a unit. More recently in the US, the nuclear family became

-you know what, I don't know why I even bother with you idiots.

Please.... we sane people would LOVE for you to stop bothering with us, go back to your unabomber style shack and keep writing that manifesto on an old underwood you KNOW isn't part of the capitalist evil empire.

Enjoy your reciprocal negrep, Sally Frillypants.

so the form of the family unit hasn't changed over the course of human history?

this is why i thought it was too bad there weren't any proper commies on the board. trying to argue over the deal, they're dishing neg-reps over the definition of family.

i think that the family is one of the last vestiges of natural communism. the earliest humanity were certainly commies, as they had to rely on eachother for protection and food. much like north america's natives, smaller societies worked in a communist unit which crossed family lines to incorporate a whole village.

immersed in capitalism, families and charities are some of the only concepts to maintain some of the mechanics of real communism.

i'll be your huckleberry, JB: the family unit in developed countries has shrunken in size and structural definition, my guess is that capitalism's displacement of the protections of communist life is the cause.

 

[HUGGY]

See what a bunch of communists you people are? My comment on the family unit was just a suggestion that in small groups, communism..as in sharing the available resources and distributing them as needed to everyone in a family is comon.

The POINT was that people that cry COMMUNISM probably were born communists but in reality there are no communists when once outside the family unit you are basically on your own.

 

[antagon]

i thought antagon thanked HUGGY for that 'helpful post'

i'm not a commie. i dont think anyone on this thread has taken up a defense for communism as a national socio-economic system. you said in another post i didn't think was helpful that there werent any commies in the US. it remains a fact that there are folks who argue that communism is superior as a system, whether or not they live with their parents. none of them seem to be on the USMB.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

None that will own up to it, anyways.

Liberal = Socialist = Communist = Marxist = Progressive = Fascist

The equivalency is undeniable. Now if only we had enough vowels to make a snappy acronym out of that truth.

I have peer reviewed this post and found it 100% accurate

There is clearly a growing Consensus that modern Democrats are Fascists

 

[Big Fitz]

What is the definition of "is" again?

Please. More hair splitting and distinctions without meanings?

You realize that the definition and form of the family unit has changed over time, right?.

lol at fitz getting mad at the facts

Who's mad? Oh I'm sorry, that's your projection to make yourself feel better. Okay, gotcha.

That said, none of you have disproven my postulate. It's been funny to see you throw up semantic smokescreens in attempt to say "there! that's proof!"

I guess all that relativism has rotted your brain's ability to recognize truth being obscured with window dressing anymore.

 

[Big Fitz]

Please.... we sane people would LOVE for you to stop bothering with us, go back to your unabomber style shack and keep writing that manifesto on an old underwood you KNOW isn't part of the capitalist evil empire.

Enjoy your reciprocal negrep, Sally Frillypants.

so the form of the family unit hasn't changed over the course of human history?

this is why i thought it was too bad there weren't any proper commies on the board. trying to argue over the deal, they're dishing neg-reps over the definition of family.

i think that the family is one of the last vestiges of natural communism. the earliest humanity were certainly commies, as they had to rely on eachother for protection and food. much like north america's natives, smaller societies worked in a communist unit which crossed family lines to incorporate a whole village.

immersed in capitalism, families and charities are some of the only concepts to maintain some of the mechanics of real communism.

i'll be your huckleberry, JB: the family unit in developed countries has shrunken in size and structural definition, my guess is that capitalism's displacement of the protections of communist life is the cause.

The Family Unit... Huggy put it out there very well.

The left have been working to EXPAND the term to cover other things. Sometimes successfully, most times not. What they will fail to recognize is that there is a true and original form of the family which is structured by bloodline and progeny.

This is your traditional TRUE family:
Mother Father Child Grandchild Great Grand Child.

This is the basic molecule of life for most warm blooded life on this planet to some form or another. To human beings it is showing more and more evidence to not only being the fundamental unit of governance but absolutely necessary for good mental health as well.

Then there is the extended family which includes direct links of progeny through siblings.

Parents > Aunts and Uncles > Cousins

This provides a secondary level of stability to human interaction and relations. If disaster happens and someone has died, often the extended family comes together to help those in it to bear the loss from ideal. In a way, this create the informal unit of a tribe, usually based around the elders in the Nuclear family.

Of course life never works out the way we expect and there are other ways into a family than just by direct blood line. There is also the tradition/instinct to adoption. This can happen through a feeling of need by the members of the family, and then through agreement of the rest of the family to be includes as if they are of the same bloodline. But this is not the true natural form, but it IS an acceptable form in the sense of human interaction.

These are the traditional definitions of family and how they give the basic structure to human society. People may try to claim other things are family and well... tradition and biology may or may not back them up. But this has been the definition of family and will continue to be so for as long as mankind exists.

 

[JBeukema]

The Family Unit... Huggy put it out there very well.

The left have been working to EXPAND the term to cover other things.

Extended families being treated as a single unit (as opposed to the nuclear family) would actually be conservative by deinition, as t would bea return to the status quo ante.

Sometimes successfully, most times not. What they will fail to recognize is that there is a true and original form of the family which is structured by bloodline and progeny.

This is your traditional TRUE family:
Mother Father Child Grandchild Great Grand Child.

Right... so 'traditionally', your siblings aunt, uncle, nieces,and nephews weren't a part of your family

Then there is the extended family which includes direct links of progeny through siblings.

Parents > Aunts and Uncles > Cousins

'extended family' is family, you dolt, and only relatively recently in history did the nuclear family become the- you know what, just go to the library and get some books on history and anthropology.

Of course, technically speaking, all lifeforms on earth are related; it's just a matter of degree.

 

[Political Junky]

ONe wonders why a group of right wingers, admiring Hitler and Mussolini, planned a Coup to overthrow FDR in 1934. The plot was stopped by Smedley Butler.
Smedley Butler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In early 1934, Butler alleged the existence of a political conspiracy of Wall Street interests to overthrow President Roosevelt, a series of allegations that came to be known in the media as the Business Plot.[51] In March 1934, the House of Representatives authorized investigations into his allegations by a special committee headed by John W. McCormack of Massachusetts and Samuel Dickstein of New York. The McCormack-Dickstein committee was a precursor to the House Committee on Un-American Activities.[52]

In November 1934, Butler told the committee that a group of businessmen, claiming to be backed by a private army of 500,000 ex-soldiers and others, intended to establish a fascist dictatorship. Butler had been asked to lead it, he said, by Gerald P. MacGuire, a bond salesman with Grayson M–P Murphy & Co. The New York Times reported that Butler had told friends that General Hugh S. Johnson, a former official with the National Recovery Administration, was to be installed as dictator. Butler said MacGuire had told him the attempted coup was backed by three million dollars, and that the 500,000 men were probably to be assembled in Washington, D.C. the following year. All the parties alleged to be involved, including Johnson, said there was no truth in the story, calling it a joke and a fantasy.[52]

When the committee's final report was released, the Times said the committee "purported to report that a two-month investigation had convinced it that General Butler's story of a Fascist march on Washington was alarmingly true" and "... also alleged that definite proof had been found that the much publicized Fascist march on Washington, which was to have been led by Major. Gen. Smedley D. Butler, retired, according to testimony at a hearing, was actually contemplated".[59]

The McCormack-Dickstein Committee, which was a precursor to the House Un-American Activities Committee, confirmed some of Butler's accusations in its final report. "In the last few weeks of the committee's official life it received evidence showing that certain persons had made an attempt to establish a fascist organization in this country...There is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient."[60] [n 1][n

Doesn't disprove a damn thing. This coup attempt was being planned by fascists who have always warred against communists then went out and did the same things, except with the trappings of private enterprise. But as Mussolini explains about Corporatism, which he believed the true name for fascism, was about co-opting the corporations and bringing them into the state fold for control.

A distinction without a meaning for the results were always the same, regardless of how they were applied.

A group of right wingers plotted against Roosevelt. You say that fascists are on the left. Why would the left plot against the left?
In 1934 a group of right wing business men plotted to overthrow FDR, in support of the right wing fascist dicatators, Mussolini and Hitler, who despised the Liberals and Socialists.

 

[JBeukema]

Doesn't disprove a damn thing. This coup attempt was being planned by fascists who have always warred against communists then went out and did the same things, except with the trappings of private enterprise. But as Mussolini explains about Corporatism, which he believed the true name for fascism, was about co-opting the corporations and bringing them into the state fold for control.

A distinction without a meaning for the results were always the same, regardless of how they were applied.

A group of right wingers plotted against Roosevelt. You say that fascists are on the left. Why would the left plot against the left?
In 1934 a group of right wing business men plotted to overthrow FDR, in support of the right wing fascist dicatators, Mussolini and Hitler, who despised the Liberals and Socialists.

Stop. You're going to confuse it.

 

[Political Junky]

"It" is already very confused.

 

[topspin]

pretty gay, clay akin thinks soccer is rally gay. Fanny packs think soccer is gay.

Usually white trash republicans can't debate so they call progressives communist. It's a KKK talking points thingy.