The massive tax cut like the one in the Bush years didn’t benefit workers for a very simple reason

[Billy000]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

 

[healthmyths]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part. do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

Well there are more jobs than "qualified" people to fill them. Fortunately dummies like you that can't even pay attention to a simple red dotted line indicating you completely misspelled
"fiduciary" (feduciaery responsibility)

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

won't be getting those jobs because simple following instructions i.e. LIKE A LITTLE red dotted line is trying to show you is evidently too complicated!

 

[Billy000]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part. do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

Well there are more jobs than "qualified" people to fill them. Fortunately dummies like you that can't even pay attention to a simple red dotted line indicating you completely misspelled
"fiduciary" (feduciaery responsibility)

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

View attachment 201914

View attachment 201913
won't be getting those jobs because simple following instructions i.e. LIKE A LITTLE red dotted line is trying to show you is evidently too complicated!

Okay whatever. I misspelled the word. Whatever. All this red dotted line shit you’re saying means nothing of course

 

[Dale Smith]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

So letting in illegals with minimal skills and little to no education benefits the lower wage earner how, exactly?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

It’s benefited me just fine so far. You do realize you actually have to have a job in order to pay lower taxes right?

 

[Billy000]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

It’s benefited me just fine so far. You do realize you actually have to have a job in order to pay lower taxes right?

Oh so you’re speaking to 4% of the population that DON’T have jobs? Why? Why does this small percentage matter to you in terms of policy differences between the left and right?

 

[healthmyths]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part. do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

Well there are more jobs than "qualified" people to fill them. Fortunately dummies like you that can't even pay attention to a simple red dotted line indicating you completely misspelled
"fiduciary" (feduciaery responsibility)

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

View attachment 201914

View attachment 201913
won't be getting those jobs because simple following instructions i.e. LIKE A LITTLE red dotted line is trying to show you is evidently too complicated!

Okay whatever. I misspelled the word. Whatever. All this red dotted line shit you’re saying means nothing of course

But see it does!!! The devil is in the details! If you can't even pay attention to the little red-dotted line... how can you be responsible for more important issues?
I mean seriously! Don't you every follow the instructions that evidently more intelligent people do and as a result very few misspelled words by folks who just pay attention
to the little details.
Learn...

A tiny software "bug" -- three faulty computer instructions lurking among several million that modern telephone switches use to route calls -- appears to have sparked the sudden, massive failures of local telephone systems in recent weeks, the manufacturer of the equipment said yesterday.
The flaws were hidden in minor software changes that the Plano, Tex.-based company, DSC Communications Corp., provided to its telephone company customers in an effort to improve the equipment's performance. The software was sent out without major testing because DSC judged that the changes were too small to require it, DSC Vice President Frank Perpiglia said yesterday.
It was the first detailed explanation of what caused the unprecedented string of failures. In rapid sequence in June and earlier this month, local phone service in the Washington region, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Los Angeles mysteriously crashed, for as long as eight hours.
TINY 'BUG' CAUSED PHONE BLACKOUTS

Talk about the devil is in the details!

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

It’s benefited me just fine so far. You do realize you actually have to have a job in order to pay lower taxes right?

Oh so you’re speaking to 4% of the population that DON’T have jobs? Why? Why does this small percentage matter to you in terms of policy differences between the left and right?

There are more than 4% of you without jobs, Billy

 

[Billy000]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part. do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

Well there are more jobs than "qualified" people to fill them. Fortunately dummies like you that can't even pay attention to a simple red dotted line indicating you completely misspelled
"fiduciary" (feduciaery responsibility)

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

View attachment 201914

View attachment 201913
won't be getting those jobs because simple following instructions i.e. LIKE A LITTLE red dotted line is trying to show you is evidently too complicated!

Okay whatever. I misspelled the word. Whatever. All this red dotted line shit you’re saying means nothing of course

But see it does!!! The devil is in the details! If you can't even pay attention to the little red-dotted line... how can you be responsible for more important issues?
I mean seriously! Don't you every follow the instructions that evidently more intelligent people do and as a result very few misspelled words by folks who just pay attention
to the little details.
Learn...

A tiny software "bug" -- three faulty computer instructions lurking among several million that modern telephone switches use to route calls -- appears to have sparked the sudden, massive failures of local telephone systems in recent weeks, the manufacturer of the equipment said yesterday.
The flaws were hidden in minor software changes that the Plano, Tex.-based company, DSC Communications Corp., provided to its telephone company customers in an effort to improve the equipment's performance. The software was sent out without major testing because DSC judged that the changes were too small to require it, DSC Vice President Frank Perpiglia said yesterday.
It was the first detailed explanation of what caused the unprecedented string of failures. In rapid sequence in June and earlier this month, local phone service in the Washington region, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Los Angeles mysteriously crashed, for as long as eight hours.
TINY 'BUG' CAUSED PHONE BLACKOUTS

Talk about the devil is in the details!

Oh ok I see. Me misspelling the word somehow means my entire argument means nothing. That’s stupid and you know it.

 

[Billy000]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

It’s benefited me just fine so far. You do realize you actually have to have a job in order to pay lower taxes right?

Oh so you’re speaking to 4% of the population that DON’T have jobs? Why? Why does this small percentage matter to you in terms of policy differences between the left and right?

There are more than 4% of you without jobs, Billy

You don’t have any actual statistics in mind. It’s just easier to assume most people are lazy while you are a manly man who gets a paycheck every month! It’s such emotional crap that only benefits your ego. The truth of fbe matter is that welfare like SNAP mostly benefits kids, the elderly, the disabled, and veterans.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

It’s benefited me just fine so far. You do realize you actually have to have a job in order to pay lower taxes right?

Oh so you’re speaking to 4% of the population that DON’T have jobs? Why? Why does this small percentage matter to you in terms of policy differences between the left and right?

There are more than 4% of you without jobs, Billy

You don’t have any actual statistics in mind. It’s just easier to assume most people are lazy while you are a manly man who gets a paycheck every month! It’s such emotional crap that only benefits your ego. The truth of fbe matter is that welfare like SNAP mostly benefits kids, the elderly, the disabled, and veterans.

Why thank you, Billy, I am a manly man. This bicep flex is for you bruh

 

[Billy000]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

So letting in illegals with minimal skills and little to know education benefits the lower wage earner how, exactly?

Why am I not surprised you would bring up an irrelevant subject?

 

[healthmyths]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

Now as far as your truly uneducated comments...

A) What do you think those corporations and executives do with their supposedly according to you "additional wealth"?
1) Do they hide it under their mattresses or yea... bury it in the backyard....hmmmm what would you do with additional wealth?
2) Yea that's the ticket buy a yacht! I'm all in favor of that as I use to work for a yacht maker and he would have guess what "hired more help" so HE could make more profits! Evil!
3) Or maybe those evil corporations and executives like Apple has done will hmmm re-invest in more plants...meaning more hired help! Naw... they want to bury their billions!

B) Well you discussed "entry level jobs"... what a concept. "Entry level" meaning minimum wage right? I bet you are in favor of the $15 minimum.
Again... you said "entry level jobs" and again without even knowing who does those entry level jobs you and your ilk want to pay them $15/hour.
Guess what happens? I'm sure you know that these order taking kiosks don't have payroll taxes deducted that are paid by the employer. And that is just the minimum expense in having a $15/hour minimum wage entry level hire.

McDonald's to add self-order kiosks to 1,000 stores each quarter

• McDonald's will upgrade 1,000 stores with kiosk and mobile order technology every quarter for the next eight to nine quarters.

McDonald's to add self-order kiosks to 1,000 stores each quarter

ONE note billy000.... maybe next time you make comments... support with facts!

 

[Dale Smith]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

So letting in illegals with minimal skills and little to know education benefits the lower wage earner how, exactly?

Why am I not surprised you would bring up an irrelevant subject?

Silly billy, you have no clue about economics or this debt slavery system of the extension of credit where every federal reserve note (backed by nothing but our sweat equity) is "borrowed" into existence. You can't pull eleven marbles out of a bag that only contains ten. Your understanding of the system is pathetic but typical of the average leftard.

I hate to be so brutally honest but I cannot lie nor can I play these little partisan games.

 

[jasonnfree]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part. do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

Well there are more jobs than "qualified" people to fill them. Fortunately dummies like you that can't even pay attention to a simple red dotted line indicating you completely misspelled
"fiduciary" (feduciaery responsibility)

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

View attachment 201914

View attachment 201913
won't be getting those jobs because simple following instructions i.e. LIKE A LITTLE red dotted line is trying to show you is evidently too complicated!

Okay whatever. I misspelled the word. Whatever. All this red dotted line shit you’re saying means nothing of course

But see it does!!! The devil is in the details! If you can't even pay attention to the little red-dotted line... how can you be responsible for more important issues?
I mean seriously! Don't you every follow the instructions that evidently more intelligent people do and as a result very few misspelled words by folks who just pay attention
to the little details.
Learn...

A tiny software "bug" -- three faulty computer instructions lurking among several million that modern telephone switches use to route calls -- appears to have sparked the sudden, massive failures of local telephone systems in recent weeks, the manufacturer of the equipment said yesterday.
The flaws were hidden in minor software changes that the Plano, Tex.-based company, DSC Communications Corp., provided to its telephone company customers in an effort to improve the equipment's performance. The software was sent out without major testing because DSC judged that the changes were too small to require it, DSC Vice President Frank Perpiglia said yesterday.
It was the first detailed explanation of what caused the unprecedented string of failures. In rapid sequence in June and earlier this month, local phone service in the Washington region, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Los Angeles mysteriously crashed, for as long as eight hours.
TINY 'BUG' CAUSED PHONE BLACKOUTS

Talk about the devil is in the details!

Oh ok I see. Me misspelling the word somehow means my entire argument means nothing. That’s stupid and you know it.

Beware of the spelling police.... I believe same as you though. Tax cuts like bush's and reagan's and now trump's mostly benefit the very wealthy.

 

[healthmyths]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

It’s benefited me just fine so far. You do realize you actually have to have a job in order to pay lower taxes right?

Oh so you’re speaking to 4% of the population that DON’T have jobs? Why? Why does this small percentage matter to you in terms of policy differences between the left and right?

There are more than 4% of you without jobs, Billy

You don’t have any actual statistics in mind. It’s just easier to assume most people are lazy while you are a manly man who gets a paycheck every month! It’s such emotional crap that only benefits your ego. The truth of fbe matter is that welfare like SNAP mostly benefits kids, the elderly, the disabled, and veterans.

Billy,Billy,Billy....! There you go again! What is "fbe"?

Also as far as your unsubstantiated statement "easier to assume most people are lazy"

The facts are...
Food stamp recipients down 2M under Trump, USDA figures show
The numbers have declined since then, in part because of the booming economy and because some states have restored work requirements needed to qualify for SNAP, Fox News reported. In many cases the work requirements had been waived because of the recession of 2007-09.

The 2017 figure of 42.1 million people assisted is the lowest figure since 2010, when the program assisted 40.3 million people at a cost to taxpayers of $68.2 billion.
Food stamp recipients down 2M under Trump, USDA figures show
Now what other benefit comes from these people NOW working and not getting food stamps????
Payroll taxes increase!

 

[healthmyths]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part. do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

Well there are more jobs than "qualified" people to fill them. Fortunately dummies like you that can't even pay attention to a simple red dotted line indicating you completely misspelled
"fiduciary" (feduciaery responsibility)

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a feduciaery responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

View attachment 201914

View attachment 201913
won't be getting those jobs because simple following instructions i.e. LIKE A LITTLE red dotted line is trying to show you is evidently too complicated!

Okay whatever. I misspelled the word. Whatever. All this red dotted line shit you’re saying means nothing of course

But see it does!!! The devil is in the details! If you can't even pay attention to the little red-dotted line... how can you be responsible for more important issues?
I mean seriously! Don't you every follow the instructions that evidently more intelligent people do and as a result very few misspelled words by folks who just pay attention
to the little details.
Learn...

A tiny software "bug" -- three faulty computer instructions lurking among several million that modern telephone switches use to route calls -- appears to have sparked the sudden, massive failures of local telephone systems in recent weeks, the manufacturer of the equipment said yesterday.
The flaws were hidden in minor software changes that the Plano, Tex.-based company, DSC Communications Corp., provided to its telephone company customers in an effort to improve the equipment's performance. The software was sent out without major testing because DSC judged that the changes were too small to require it, DSC Vice President Frank Perpiglia said yesterday.
It was the first detailed explanation of what caused the unprecedented string of failures. In rapid sequence in June and earlier this month, local phone service in the Washington region, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Los Angeles mysteriously crashed, for as long as eight hours.
TINY 'BUG' CAUSED PHONE BLACKOUTS

Talk about the devil is in the details!

Oh ok I see. Me misspelling the word somehow means my entire argument means nothing. That’s stupid and you know it.

Beware of the spelling police.... I believe same as you though. Tax cuts like bush's and reagan's and now trump's mostly benefit the very wealthy.

"Believe" all you want... but the FACTS are irrefutable!
ALSO NOTE I don't make these statements up... they come from the FACTS.... substantiated!!!
Bush's tax cuts... LOOK at the FACTS as to what happened to revenue when the cuts were put into place!
NOTE... Tax receipts INCREASED in 2005,2006,2007... Remember tax cuts started in 2001 in response to the recession that started under Clinton in 2000.
Then in spite of the events that NO other President has ever had to fact in their terms... GWB was reducing the deficit... until the housing bubble occurred which
again as Barney Franks admitted and here is his statement:
Barney Frank Comes Home to the Facts By Larry Kudlow August 21, 2010

But one huge exception to this rule is Democrat Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.
For years, Frank was a staunch supporter of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government housing agencies that played such an enormous role in the financial meltdown that thrust the economy into the Great Recession.
But in a recent CNBC interview, Frank told me that he was ready to say goodbye to Fannie and Freddie.
"I hope by next year we'll have abolished Fannie and Freddie," he said. Remarkable. And he went on to say that "it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it." He then added, "I had been too sanguine about Fannie and Freddie."
Barney Frank admits truth about Fannie

 

[Dale Smith]

Corporations are already wealthier than ever before. There is no incentive for these corporations to invest in labor when it is just easier to save money on tax cuts. Meanwhile, the deficit explodes and only executives benefit.

Even if corporate profits weren’t at an all time high, there is still a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit. How, in part, do you maximize profit? By not investing in labor and accepting the economy as is. Right now, higher wage jobs are extremely competitive among workers while lower income jobs fill quite easily.

Lower wage workers are at the mercy of the economy. While it may be easy for republicans to call them lazy, it ignores the complexity of what creates poverty. Low wage workers do not have the time or money to spend on education that would make them qualified for skilled jobs. Of course, let’s pretend ALL workers did this. Who would be left behind to fill those entry level jobs that keep any business afloat?

It’s benefited me just fine so far. You do realize you actually have to have a job in order to pay lower taxes right?

Oh so you’re speaking to 4% of the population that DON’T have jobs? Why? Why does this small percentage matter to you in terms of policy differences between the left and right?

There are more than 4% of you without jobs, Billy

You don’t have any actual statistics in mind. It’s just easier to assume most people are lazy while you are a manly man who gets a paycheck every month! It’s such emotional crap that only benefits your ego. The truth of fbe matter is that welfare like SNAP mostly benefits kids, the elderly, the disabled, and veterans.

"The truth of fbe matter is that welfare like SNAP mostly benefits kids, the elderly, the disabled, and veterans"

And illegals...........

 

[deanrd]

The massive tax cut like the one in the Bush years didn’t benefit workers for a very simple reason

They were never supposed to.

 

[WheelieAddict]

The interest for the massive deficit the republican congress has created with tax cuts and increased spending will come due and they will all blame Obama.