The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

I love this op-ed. The Deplorables have elected a president that is the closest to a fascist as they'll ever get. Too funny.
Now that part is true. For the right, Trump is the most liberal, fascist we've ever nominated. Shameful when you consider we could have had Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, or Ben Carson.

But, he's still less fascist than anyone the left has elected over the past 100 years. He's a great illustration of the ignorance of the modern day liberal. If Trump had run with a little "D" behind his name, you people would be fellating him. He pretty much stands for everything you people want. But that little "R" causes your minds to go bat-shit crazy and you can't see anything else.
 
Just look at the title of their video: "No peaceful transition". The epitome of fascism.



No that's anarchism, you dumb shit.

Anarchism is right-wing dumb shit.

The right believes in small, limited government. The further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker (libertarian) until it ceases to exist at all - anarchy.

The left believes in large, powerful government. The further left you go, government gets larger and more powerful until it has total control - fascism/communism/etc.

This is not rocket science people.


Wrong. Anarchism is a mixture of both, with differing ideologies whether left, or right.

There is no such thing as "left-wing anarchism". It's the polar opposite of the left-wing ideology - which is a powerful, centralized government. Again:

The right believes in small, limited government. The further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker (libertarian) until it ceases to exist at all - anarchy.

The left believes in large, powerful government. The further left you go, government gets larger and more powerful until it has total control - fascism/communism/etc.


Left anarchism - Wikipedia

Right-wing anarchism - Wikipedia

Really? Wikipedia? Where volunteers type whatever they want and then they ask the world to provide "corrections"? Well hell....it MUST be true then... :doubt:
 
Claiming that liberals are fascist is akin to claiming that Bruce Jenner is a female.
Fascism is the exclusive ideology of liberals you nitwit. It is totalitarian government. What a liberal desires. The ability to force all of society to march lock-step with their idea of what the world should look like.
Is that what you've been brainwashed to believe by drug-addled numbskulls such as Rush Limbaugh??
Here it is again for you snowflake:

The right believes in small, limited government. The further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker (libertarian) until it ceases to exist at all - anarchy.

The left believes in large, powerful government. The further left you go, government gets larger and more powerful until it has total control - fascism/communism/etc.

So your answer to my inquiry is yes. You're an idiot.
 
I love this op-ed. The Deplorables have elected a president that is the closest to a fascist as they'll ever get. Too funny.
Fascist? Learn some history, You jackass party cocksuckers have no clue.
I love when two radical progressives go at it... :lmao:
That is very strange.
Dr. Grump is on your side of the aisle, nitwit. And he is echoing your sentiments. You're too stupid to know it and are attacking him. Priceless.
 
[
Now that part is true. For the right, Trump is the most liberal, fascist we've ever nominated. Shameful when you consider we could have had Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, or Ben Carson.

But, he's still less fascist than anyone the left has elected over the past 100 years. He's a great illustration of the ignorance of the modern day liberal. If Trump had run with a little "D" behind his name, you people would be fellating him. He pretty much stands for everything you people want. But that little "R" causes your minds to go bat-shit crazy and you can't see anything else.

I can't remember a president-elect or president ever refusing to take comments from the press gallery because he perceives they are biased. Never. Only Trump has done that. So your argument falls down right there.
 
[
Now that part is true. For the right, Trump is the most liberal, fascist we've ever nominated. Shameful when you consider we could have had Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, or Ben Carson.

But, he's still less fascist than anyone the left has elected over the past 100 years. He's a great illustration of the ignorance of the modern day liberal. If Trump had run with a little "D" behind his name, you people would be fellating him. He pretty much stands for everything you people want. But that little "R" causes your minds to go bat-shit crazy and you can't see anything else.

I can't remember a president-elect or president ever refusing to take comments from the press gallery because he perceives they are biased. Never. Only Trump has done that. So your argument falls down right there.
Should democrat fake news be called news?
 
I love this op-ed. The Deplorables have elected a president that is the closest to a fascist as they'll ever get. Too funny.
Fascist? Learn some history, You jackass party cocksuckers have no clue.

I'd put my knowledge of history against yours any day of the week. I bet you even think Hitler was the poster boy for fascism. He wasn't, Mussolini was. Already he is trying to marginalise the media. During the campaign he spread absolute lies and refused to articulate his policies and spread fake news.
 
[
Now that part is true. For the right, Trump is the most liberal, fascist we've ever nominated. Shameful when you consider we could have had Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, or Ben Carson.

But, he's still less fascist than anyone the left has elected over the past 100 years. He's a great illustration of the ignorance of the modern day liberal. If Trump had run with a little "D" behind his name, you people would be fellating him. He pretty much stands for everything you people want. But that little "R" causes your minds to go bat-shit crazy and you can't see anything else.

I can't remember a president-elect or president ever refusing to take comments from the press gallery because he perceives they are biased. Never. Only Trump has done that. So your argument falls down right there.
What does that have to do with "fascism"? That's just called "common sense". Why would any person talk to an individual or group spreading egregious lies about them?

By the way - as usual - you don't have any facts right. Barack Obama would not only often block/boycott Fox News, but he also had the government hack the computer of reporter Sharyl Atkinson. So much for your "memory".

White House's Fox News Boycott Attempt Prompts Network Revolt [UPDATED] | The Huffington Post
 
[
What does that have to do with "fascism"? That's just called "common sense". Why would any person talk to an individual or group spreading egregious lies about them?

By the way - as usual - you don't have any facts right. Barack Obama would not only often block/boycott Fox News, but he also had the government hack the computer of reporter Sharyl Atkinson. So much for your "memory".

White House's Fox News Boycott Attempt Prompts Network Revolt [UPDATED] | The Huffington Post

Because he is supposed to the be the bigger man. He is supposed to have dignity. Lies? You mean like accusing Obama of not being born in the US? Of arabs dancingin the streets in NJ after 9/11? Those kinds of lies.

CNN didn't lie about anything. They were reporting the news. They didn't say the golden shower incident was fact. They reported it was being investigated. That is their job.
 
I love it when radical progressives deny they are radical progressives. If you're ashamed of it - you shouldn't be it!
I don't even know what a radical progressive is or what they are supposed to believe.
All the same stuff you do. You know - rights are irrelevant. The U.S. Constitution doesn't matter. Liberty should be eliminated. All should bow to the state. Etc.
 
[
All the same stuff you do. You know - rights are irrelevant. The U.S. Constitution doesn't matter. Liberty should be eliminated. All should bow to the state. Etc.

I think a certain type of right winger is a cretin. I see it every day on this board. As for liberty being eliminated, you wait and see what Trumpie does. It's already started with him refusing to engage with certain media outlets.

As for the rest? BS...I don't believe any of those things. I believe you need a mixture of socialism and capitalism for a society to work.
 
As for liberty being eliminated, you wait and see what Trumpie does. It's already started with him refusing to engage with certain media outlets.
Trump is a dirt-bag. Which comes as no surprise since he is a life-long liberal. I fully expect him to trample the U.S. Constitution just like every dirt-bag Dumbocrat president ever has.

But that being said - refusing to speak with a news outlet is hardly "eliminating liberty". My liberty is not the least bit impacted by CNN's inability to get a sound bit from someone who is not even President of the United States at this time.
 
I believe you need a mixture of socialism and capitalism for a society to work.
Well your "belief" has already been proven to be a spectacular failure. For a society to work - it needs maximum liberty in all facets of life (personal freedom, economic freedom, etc.) coupled with the personal freedom to decide when, where, and how much to assist those in need.

Every single thing that the left desires can be achieved through foundations in the free market (just as Bill and Melinda Gates who started the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). Yet none of you progressives ever start foundations for the social causes you claim to "care" about. Why? Because it's not about social causes with your side of the aisle. It's about control. Fascism is about power and control. Forcing people into creating the society the fascist desires.

And it's the easiest way to know that the left is absolutely wrong in everything they stand for. When you have to achieve everything by force - at the barrel of a gun - then you know you are wrong.
 
Well your "belief" has already been proven to be a spectacular failure. For a society to work - it needs maximum liberty in all facets of life (personal freedom, economic freedom, etc.) coupled with the personal freedom to decide when, where, and how much to assist those in need.

Every single thing that the left desires can be achieved through foundations in the free market (just as Bill and Melinda Gates who started the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). Yet none of you progressives ever start foundations for the social causes you claim to "care" about. Why? Because it's not about social causes with your side of the aisle. It's about control. Fascism is about power and control. Forcing people into creating the society the fascist desires.

And it's the easiest way to know that the left is absolutely wrong in everything they stand for. When you have to achieve everything by force - at the barrel of a gun - then you know you are wrong.

My belief has been a spectacular failure? Northern European countries, Australia, NZ and Canada all have a mixture of capitalism and socialism. Many of them rank higher than the US for enjoyment of life, life expectancy, education - a myriad of things.

Corruption Index: US is 16..outranked by many socialist/capitalist mix countries
Transparency International - The Global Anti-Corruption Coalition

Quality of life index: US number 7. Outranked by socialist/capitalist mix countries
Quality of Life Index by Country 2017

Human development index: US number 8. Outranked by socialist/capitalist mix countries
List of countries by Human Development Index - Wikipedia

Education; US number 29
The Best Education Systems In The World In 2015 | Fair Reporters

I could go on....

Your economic 'freedom' has been tried before. Most South and Central American countries tried it. It left 1 percent of the people super rich, the rest dirt poor, which is why so many had socialist revolutions in the 60s and 70s.
 

Forum List

Back
Top