The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

Republicans' approval rating has gone up 30% in just 1 month! keep up the crazy shit, liberals!
 
I have on the shelves about six or more booklets on political ideologies. Not one of these booklets say anything about fascism being on the left but always
on the right, the conservative right, One of the booklets "The Political Spectrum" does not even mention fascism.
 
The bottom line is that all the leftists in America defended Hitler until he invaded the Soviet Union. The minute he did that, they started agitating for America to go to war with Germany. That's the reason we got involved in the war.

Try reading history.

Hitler hated communism and his party was not socialist in any way, except name. Hitler and his brown shirts co-opted the well established Nationalist Socialist Party which had offices, infrastructure and voter lists to work with. After they took over the party, Hitler wanted to change the name but was talked out of it for PR reasons.

or

The National Socialist Party that Hitler joined was anti-Semitic, wanted to destroy the Versailles Treaty (to be fair, so did all the parties in Getmany) and wanted living space for Germany. In other words, them things which nazi Germany is so known for. Hitler didn't change the ideology of the party. He was an effective advocate of it.

Moreover, these arguments (minus the Versailles stuff) came from members of the prewar National Socialist parties that had existed in the old Austrian Empire, which in turn were formed by defectors from the Social Democratic Party in that country.

Hitler hated the communists as competitors-- a party who could take votes from him. Indeed in 1925, the nazis were debating whether to merge with the communists. Goebbels (who supported the effort) said that it made sense as there was basically no difference between the two. Hitler, however, was of the opinion that the Communists should merge into them. In a way, that is what happened-/ Communist voters flocked to the nazis.
 
The bottom line is that all the leftists in America defended Hitler until he invaded the Soviet Union. The minute he did that, they started agitating for America to go to war with Germany. That's the reason we got involved in the war.

Try reading history.

Hitler hated communism and his party was not socialist in any way, except name. Hitler and his brown shirts co-opted the well established Nationalist Socialist Party which had offices, infrastructure and voter lists to work with. After they took over the party, Hitler wanted to change the name but was talked out of it for PR reasons.

or

The National Socialist Party that Hitler joined was anti-Semitic, wanted to destroy the Versailles Treaty (to be fair, so did all the parties in Getmany) and wanted living space for Germany. In other words, them things which nazi Germany is so known for. Hitler didn't change the ideology of the party. He was an effective advocate of it.

Moreover, these arguments (minus the Versailles stuff) came from members of the prewar National Socialist parties that had existed in the old Austrian Empire, which in turn were formed by defectors from the Social Democratic Party in that country.

Hitler hated the communists as competitors-- a party who could take votes from him. Indeed in 1925, the nazis were debating whether to merge with the communists. Goebbels (who supported the effort) said that it made sense as there was basically no difference between the two. Hitler, however, was of the opinion that the Communists should merge into them. In a way, that is what happened-/ Communist voters flocked to the nazis.
I never cease to marvel at how uneducated Dumbocrats are about history, politics, etc. Thank you for educating them!
 
You know it's pretty bad when University of Cal professors are talking about how the left is desperately trying to destroy humanity....

 
The bottom line is that all the leftists in America defended Hitler until he invaded the Soviet Union. The minute he did that, they started agitating for America to go to war with Germany. That's the reason we got involved in the war.

Try reading history.

Hitler hated communism and his party was not socialist in any way, except name. Hitler and his brown shirts co-opted the well established Nationalist Socialist Party which had offices, infrastructure and voter lists to work with. After they took over the party, Hitler wanted to change the name but was talked out of it for PR reasons.

or

The National Socialist Party that Hitler joined was anti-Semitic, wanted to destroy the Versailles Treaty (to be fair, so did all the parties in Getmany) and wanted living space for Germany. In other words, them things which nazi Germany is so known for. Hitler didn't change the ideology of the party. He was an effective advocate of it.

Moreover, these arguments (minus the Versailles stuff) came from members of the prewar National Socialist parties that had existed in the old Austrian Empire, which in turn were formed by defectors from the Social Democratic Party in that country.

Hitler hated the communists as competitors-- a party who could take votes from him. Indeed in 1925, the nazis were debating whether to merge with the communists. Goebbels (who supported the effort) said that it made sense as there was basically no difference between the two. Hitler, however, was of the opinion that the Communists should merge into them. In a way, that is what happened-/ Communist voters flocked to the nazis.
I never cease to marvel at how uneducated Dumbocrats are about history, politics, etc. Thank you for educating them!
So why do Republicans constantly accuse history professors of being liberal?
 
So if a student destroys a Democratic sign it's proof that Republicans are fascist.
A single student? No. But if we have thousands and thousands and thousands of examples as you hatriots have given us over the past two years - then yes.

How long do you plan to ignore reality before you accept it? I'm just curious.
 
So why do Republicans constantly accuse history professors of being liberal?
I'm sorry - are you under the impression that hatriots require fellow hatriots to be educated in order to teach? Bwahahahahaha! By the way - even the few that actually do know the truth don't speak it anyway. On the very rare occasion they actually are educated, they lie to push their very disturbing agenda.
 
So why do Republicans constantly accuse history professors of being liberal?
I'm sorry - are you under the impression that hatriots require fellow hatriots to be educated in order to teach? Bwahahahahaha! By the way - even the few that actually do know the truth don't speak it anyway. On the very rare occasion they actually are educated, they lie to push their very disturbing agenda.
So should America trust historians for history; if not, who should Americans trust for that subject?
 
So should America trust historians for history; if not, who should Americans trust for that subject?
Oh I don't know....maybe the endless volumes of original writings that we have?!? For instance - the official hatriot position is that Thomas Jefferson was an "atheist". Rather than buying into that hatriot lie with an agenda - why not read any of the hundreds of letters that still exist today in which Jefferson writes about his faith and love of Jesus? :dunno:

So simple, only the left could be baffled by it!
 
The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

There is no march, they are already there and support it!

Just at the support the far left gave Obama during his fascist regime!
 
So if a student destroys a Democratic sign it's proof that Republicans are fascist.
A single student? No. But if we have thousands and thousands and thousands of examples as you hatriots have given us over the past two years - then yes.

How long do you plan to ignore reality before you accept it? I'm just curious.
If you're talking about your reality-forget it. Too many history books in the library and I've read too many to be swayed by people on these boards that cannot even define liberal, or else define it to fit their politics.
 
So why do Republicans constantly accuse history professors of being liberal?
I'm sorry - are you under the impression that hatriots require fellow hatriots to be educated in order to teach? Bwahahahahaha! By the way - even the few that actually do know the truth don't speak it anyway. On the very rare occasion they actually are educated, they lie to push their very disturbing agenda.
So should America trust historians for history; if not, who should Americans trust for that subject?

Any non-liberal American historian before 1980. Now, this is what is called a precise answer. (Signed, a very, very smart Rutgers' grad........).
 

Forum List

Back
Top