Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still not the false claim WUWT made, but thank you for continuing the deflection.Not the false claim WUWT made, but thank you for the deflection.WUWT never tells the truth.The left's entire narrative is completely falling apart with each passing day...
Alarmists say global warming to blame for ‘record’ tick population — but there’s one massive problem"It has not warmed in Alabama in the last century according to NOAA’s own data,” Watts wrote on his website Watts Up With That? “In fact the average temperature has COOLED since 1895…"
The actual NOAA data:
^ Chart shows no warming for over 100 years.
Chart still shows no warming in 100 years
Still not the false claim WUWT made, but thank you for continuing the deflection.Not the false claim WUWT made, but thank you for the deflection.WUWT never tells the truth.The left's entire narrative is completely falling apart with each passing day...
Alarmists say global warming to blame for ‘record’ tick population — but there’s one massive problem
The actual NOAA data:
^ Chart shows no warming for over 100 years.
Chart still shows no warming in 100 years
If you agree that Alabama is NOT the whole globe!!!!!Still not the false claim WUWT made, but thank you for continuing the deflection.Not the false claim WUWT made, but thank you for the deflection.WUWT never tells the truth.
The actual NOAA data:
^ Chart shows no warming for over 100 years.
Chart still shows no warming in 100 years
You agree that the chart shows no warming in 100 years, right?
The left's entire narrative is completely falling apart with each passing day...
Alarmists say global warming to blame for ‘record’ tick population — but there’s one massive problem"It has not warmed in Alabama in the last century according to NOAA’s own data,” Watts wrote on his website Watts Up With That? “In fact the average temperature has COOLED since 1895…"
The modern leftist is the most cunning thief there is.
Scientist of the day speaking to Aristotle:I see. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world have policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Now who is it that is denying science?The left's entire narrative is completely falling apart with each passing day...
Alarmists say global warming to blame for ‘record’ tick population — but there’s one massive problem"It has not warmed in Alabama in the last century according to NOAA’s own data,” Watts wrote on his website Watts Up With That? “In fact the average temperature has COOLED since 1895…"
What was the ocean temperature 10 miles from Cuba pm March 7th, 1346 AD?For all the deniers out there, here is a challenge for you.
The data sets of temperatures world wide are readily available for anyone that wishes to download them and do their own analysis. You can also download the data for other variables such as volcanic activity, CO2 levels, solar energy and more.
So, I challenge each of you deniers to download this data and then run it through an analysis program. SPSS is the most user friendly but it is not a free program so there is also R which is very powerful and an open source program. Do a multivariate analysis on the data and see which has the most impact on the temperatures. Then maybe do a bivariate analysis and see the correlation between CO2 levels and temperature rise.
Once you have done that, report back your findings. Until such time you are just a bunch of parrots repeating what the GOP has told you to say. Think for yourself for a change, do the work and see what you find.
Still waiting...what are you all afraid of?
Breitbart is of course the premiere source of scientific knowledge, but I'm shocked they only gave one side of the scientific debate. Go figure.The science doesn’t lie - the Dumbocrats do...
Tidalgate: Climate Alarmists Caught Faking Sea Level Rise
It seems that you are. You may be correct about global warming but the currently accepted scientific interpretation of the data is that it is real. On what evidence do you doubt the earth is warming?Now who is it that is denying science?
LOL! You always ignore the facts and play your wanna be intellectual game. All the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. But guess what? lol, as for evidence of no global warming, zip, but it's beyond arrogance to make a claim based on 150 years of data, at best on a 4 billion year old planet! lol! And regressives are nothing if not arrogant.It seems that you are. You may be correct about global warming but the currently accepted scientific interpretation of the data is that it is real. On what evidence do you doubt the earth is warming?Now who is it that is denying science?
Or is it only the cause of the warming, natural or man-made, that you question? If that is the case, why does it matter if the effects are the same?
Here is a fact you ignore: not all the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC). Aristotle provided evidence for the spherical shape of the Earth on empirical grounds by around 330 BC. Knowledge of the spherical Earth gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world from then on.[2][3][4][5]LOL! You always ignore the facts and play your wanna be intellectual game. All the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. But guess what? lol, as for evidence of no global warming, zip, but it's beyond arrogance to make a claim based on 150 years of data, at best on a 4 billion year old planet! lol! And regressives are nothing if not arrogant.It seems that you are. You may be correct about global warming but the currently accepted scientific interpretation of the data is that it is real. On what evidence do you doubt the earth is warming?Now who is it that is denying science?
Or is it only the cause of the warming, natural or man-made, that you question? If that is the case, why does it matter if the effects are the same?
I haven't ignored anything. Here's a fact you ignore, not all scientists believe Global warming.Here is a fact you ignore: not all the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC). Aristotle provided evidence for the spherical shape of the Earth on empirical grounds by around 330 BC. Knowledge of the spherical Earth gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world from then on.[2][3][4][5]LOL! You always ignore the facts and play your wanna be intellectual game. All the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. But guess what? lol, as for evidence of no global warming, zip, but it's beyond arrogance to make a claim based on 150 years of data, at best on a 4 billion year old planet! lol! And regressives are nothing if not arrogant.It seems that you are. You may be correct about global warming but the currently accepted scientific interpretation of the data is that it is real. On what evidence do you doubt the earth is warming?Now who is it that is denying science?
Or is it only the cause of the warming, natural or man-made, that you question? If that is the case, why does it matter if the effects are the same?
As for evidence of global warming, I've seen it with my own eyes. I was in Iceland recently and saw a glacier that has retreated a kilometer in the last 50 years. This is the general rule for the earth's glaciers. Or is this a fact you choose to ignore?
Not all just the vast majority. Also, Consensus Affirmed: Virtually All Climate Scientists Agree Warming Is Manmade.I haven't ignored anything. Here's a fact you ignore, not all scientists believe Global warming.Here is a fact you ignore: not all the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC). Aristotle provided evidence for the spherical shape of the Earth on empirical grounds by around 330 BC. Knowledge of the spherical Earth gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world from then on.[2][3][4][5]LOL! You always ignore the facts and play your wanna be intellectual game. All the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. But guess what? lol, as for evidence of no global warming, zip, but it's beyond arrogance to make a claim based on 150 years of data, at best on a 4 billion year old planet! lol! And regressives are nothing if not arrogant.It seems that you are. You may be correct about global warming but the currently accepted scientific interpretation of the data is that it is real. On what evidence do you doubt the earth is warming?Now who is it that is denying science?
Or is it only the cause of the warming, natural or man-made, that you question? If that is the case, why does it matter if the effects are the same?
As for evidence of global warming, I've seen it with my own eyes. I was in Iceland recently and saw a glacier that has retreated a kilometer in the last 50 years. This is the general rule for the earth's glaciers. Or is this a fact you choose to ignore?
Yeah, because we know how all those so-called "climate scientists" on the government payroll always point out all the flaws in their arguments and present the arguments presented by their critics.Breitbart is of course the premiere source of scientific knowledge, but I'm shocked they only gave one side of the scientific debate. Go figure.The science doesn’t lie - the Dumbocrats do...
Tidalgate: Climate Alarmists Caught Faking Sea Level Rise
Not all just the vast majority. Also, Consensus Affirmed: Virtually All Climate Scientists Agree Warming Is Manmade.I haven't ignored anything. Here's a fact you ignore, not all scientists believe Global warming.Here is a fact you ignore: not all the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC). Aristotle provided evidence for the spherical shape of the Earth on empirical grounds by around 330 BC. Knowledge of the spherical Earth gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world from then on.[2][3][4][5]LOL! You always ignore the facts and play your wanna be intellectual game. All the "scientists" claimed the world was flat. But guess what? lol, as for evidence of no global warming, zip, but it's beyond arrogance to make a claim based on 150 years of data, at best on a 4 billion year old planet! lol! And regressives are nothing if not arrogant.It seems that you are. You may be correct about global warming but the currently accepted scientific interpretation of the data is that it is real. On what evidence do you doubt the earth is warming?Now who is it that is denying science?
Or is it only the cause of the warming, natural or man-made, that you question? If that is the case, why does it matter if the effects are the same?
As for evidence of global warming, I've seen it with my own eyes. I was in Iceland recently and saw a glacier that has retreated a kilometer in the last 50 years. This is the general rule for the earth's glaciers. Or is this a fact you choose to ignore?
A nice visual:
For all the deniers out there, here is a challenge for you.
The data sets of temperatures world wide are readily available for anyone that wishes to download them and do their own analysis. You can also download the data for other variables such as volcanic activity, CO2 levels, solar energy and more.
So, I challenge each of you deniers to download this data and then run it through an analysis program. SPSS is the most user friendly but it is not a free program so there is also R which is very powerful and an open source program. Do a multivariate analysis on the data and see which has the most impact on the temperatures. Then maybe do a bivariate analysis and see the correlation between CO2 levels and temperature rise.
Once you have done that, report back your findings. Until such time you are just a bunch of parrots repeating what the GOP has told you to say. Think for yourself for a change, do the work and see what you find.
Still waiting...what are you all afraid of?
Good. I'm relieved to know you're familiar with the scientific method and the peer review process.Yeah, because we know how all those so-called "climate scientists" on the government payroll always point out all the flaws in their arguments and present the arguments presented by their critics.
Really? I had no idea. Got any peer-reviewed sources?Fake data.
It has been proven that all these sources have doctored their data.
