The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

[bripat9643]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

 

[themirrorthief]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

they should have established a chomp zone like democrats

 

[Concerned American]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Can the courts invalidate a scam impeachment?

 

[Billy000]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

 

[Concerned American]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

 

[Billy000]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

 

[Lastamender]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

There are some dead Anti-Fa in Kenosha. That proves they were there. Next.

 

[Billy000]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

There are some dead Anti-Fa in Kenosha. That proves they were there. Next.

No, you’re just making shit up.

 

[Concerned American]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

 

[Concerned American]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

There are some dead Anti-Fa in Kenosha. That proves they were there. Next.

No, you’re just making shit up.

WRONG. You are in denial.

 

[Billy000]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

No, moron, you’re just pretending ANTIFA was involved. It’s just a boogeyman word you use for any protests or rioting you don’t like. This organization barely exists. It has no leadership or organization structure. It simply exists when anecdotal random people decide to call themselves as such.

 

[bripat9643]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

No, moron, you’re just pretending ANTIFA was involved. It’s just a boogeyman word you use for any protests or rioting you don’t like. This organization barely exists. It has no leadership or organization structure. It simply exists when anecdotal random people decide to call themselves as such.

Right, they don't exist:

 

[Billy000]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

No, moron, you’re just pretending ANTIFA was involved. It’s just a boogeyman word you use for any protests or rioting you don’t like. This organization barely exists. It has no leadership or organization structure. It simply exists when anecdotal random people decide to call themselves as such.

Right, they don't exist:

Yep. Random people. Tell me, who is the leadership? How many members? Where do their HQ’s operate? Why does the FBI not consider them a threat like they do white supremacist groups who have actual leaders and organizing structure?

 

[Concerned American]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

No, moron, you’re just pretending ANTIFA was involved. It’s just a boogeyman word you use for any protests or rioting you don’t like. This organization barely exists. It has no leadership or organization structure. It simply exists when anecdotal random people decide to call themselves as such.

Tell the people of Portland that. They're still rioting, Zeeeero.

 

[Concerned American]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

No, moron, you’re just pretending ANTIFA was involved. It’s just a boogeyman word you use for any protests or rioting you don’t like. This organization barely exists. It has no leadership or organization structure. It simply exists when anecdotal random people decide to call themselves as such.

Right, they don't exist:

Yep. Random people. Tell me, who is the leadership? How many members? Where do their HQ’s operate? Why does the FBI not consider them a threat like they do white supremacist groups who have actual leaders and organizing structure?

HaHaHa, If they don't exist, WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU DEFENDING. You are a moron.

 

[Billy000]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

No, moron, you’re just pretending ANTIFA was involved. It’s just a boogeyman word you use for any protests or rioting you don’t like. This organization barely exists. It has no leadership or organization structure. It simply exists when anecdotal random people decide to call themselves as such.

Right, they don't exist:

Yep. Random people. Tell me, who is the leadership? How many members? Where do their HQ’s operate? Why does the FBI not consider them a threat like they do white supremacist groups who have actual leaders and organizing structure?

HaHaHa, If they don't exist, WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU DEFENDING. You are a moron.

Lol how am I defending anyone? I also never said they didn’t exist. I said they barely exist. It is just random people calling themselves ANTIFA. That’s it. That’s all it is.

 

[bripat9643]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

What does your post have to do with what I posted? Does it even mention Antifa?

 

[toobfreak]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

STRIKE ONE: The Left stole the election then tried to bury the issue by discrediting Trump and his supporters.
STRIKE TWO: The Left spun the Capitol protest as an insurrection by domestic terrorists to hide the fact that THEY caused it. Now that too is falling apart.
STRIKE THREE: They based an entire impeachment on something that never happened, as fast as possible, before any facts came in.

That leaves the Left with a:

1. Fraudulent president attained by fraudulent means.
2. A revolt they tried to spin up and are now caught in the cross-hairs.
3. A failed impeachment proving to be as specious as the first.

That leaves Trump with:

• Still able to run for office.
• Acquitted of two bogus impeachments.
• Looking better than ever after Biden in office.
• Cleared of a revolt at the Capitol.
• Saved the country with the vaccine.
• Showing more and more every day that the election was a cheat.

 

[Concerned American]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

Irrelevant. When compared to the treatment of BLM and Antifa mobs of the past year, Jan. 6 was a minor blip--So if we are to follow the equal protections tenets of the law--NO action at all should be taken.

What is this bullshit treatment you’re referring to? People were obviously arrested. Also, where is the evidence that ANTIFA had anything to do with those summer riots? You don’t have any. Quit pretending that you do.

Where the fuck were you last summer? Under a rock? Antifa rioted every night for over 100 days in Portland and BLM rioted in multiple major cities throughout last year. Please come out of your basement or clean your stomach window.

No, moron, you’re just pretending ANTIFA was involved. It’s just a boogeyman word you use for any protests or rioting you don’t like. This organization barely exists. It has no leadership or organization structure. It simply exists when anecdotal random people decide to call themselves as such.

Right, they don't exist:

Yep. Random people. Tell me, who is the leadership? How many members? Where do their HQ’s operate? Why does the FBI not consider them a threat like they do white supremacist groups who have actual leaders and organizing structure?

HaHaHa, If they don't exist, WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU DEFENDING. You are a moron.

Lol how am I defending anyone? I also never said they didn’t exist. I said they barely exist. It is just random people calling themselves ANTIFA. That’s it. That’s all it is.

Fuck off. Another circular argument troll. You're fucking cancelled.

 

[Billy000]

The court isn't buying the Dim plan to stage show trials where they prosecute Jan 6 protestors on Trump up charges.

AWWWWWWW! Po witto babies!

The January 6 Prosecutions Hit a Speed Bump

Democrat hopes for show trials a la Stalin's Great Purge are beginning to fade.​

​

Two weeks ago, I wrote of the Department of Justice’s overreach respecting some of the hundreds of January 6 defendants. On Friday the D.C. Circuit clipped the department’s wings. I expect more such losses as time goes on and the Department must actually present evidence in contested trials.​

​

The ploy of keeping in D.C. jails without bail some of the protestors who engaged in no specific violent acts at the Capitol until their cases can be heard was very obviously designed to compel them to plea bargain so they could return home to their families and jobs, and the three-judge panel wasn’t buying it. If you think that there is a partisan tinge to their decision, you’d be wrong, Judge Robert Wilkins was confirmed under Barack Obama; Judge Judith Rogers under Bill Clinton, and Judge George Katsas under Donald Trump. It was bipartisan.​

​

The case made it to the Circuit Court upon appeal from a detention order by Judge Royce Lamberth (a senior judge first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan). I mention the judicial appointment history of these judges as an antidote to the all-too-common implications that judges are always using the law to cover their personal political beliefs. Sometimes it appears they do. Other times -- like this one -- they are honestly applying the Constitution and law to the facts.​

​

And they do so here in what was clearly the Department of Justice’s political effort to paint with a broad brush anyone who supported Trump on January 6 and to place unreasonable and unlawful burdens on those protestors in order to bolster overcharged crimes.​

Lol you people can’t seem to make up your minds on whether or not they were all secretly ANTIFA or not. I guess it depends on the narrative you’re spewing.

What does your post have to do with what I posted? Does it even mention Antifa?

Yeah obviously that is my point. I am referring to your double speak about the riots. You blamed ANTIFA for it before. Now because the narrative on prosecution is in your favor in this one measly article, you pretend you never claimed this to begin with.