The Israeli Interpretation of 'peace-process'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ventura77

VIP Member
Oct 11, 2017
1,239
65
60
Netanyahu explains that, ā€œThe main thing, first of all, is to hit them [the Arabs]. Not just one blow, but blows that are so painful that the price will be too heavy to be borne,ā€ a policy doctrine we are now seeing play out in Israelā€™s current assault on Gaza in which the ā€˜priceā€™ that is intended to be ā€˜too heavy to be borne,ā€™ is measured in the indiscriminate murder of innocent civilian lives- their homes, their playgrounds, their beaches, their schools, their mosques, their hospitals; Israel has shown in Protective Edge that no one and no place in Gaza, not even childrenā€™s playgrounds and hospitals in which no militants whatsoever are present, is immune from the all-powerful roar of the highly-tuned, well-oiled and technologically sophisticated multi-billion dollar US-made killing machine that it has now descended upon the mostly defenseless, economically strangled, and poverty-induced population of Gaza (a WikiLeaks cable quoted an Israeli official in 2008 telling the US that they would ā€œkeep Gazaā€™s economy on the brink of collapse,ā€ to ensure that the economy was ā€œfunctioning at the lowest level possible consistent with avoiding a humanitarian crisis.ā€)
 
Donā€™t Make Me Shoot You

Nafeez Ahmed reports that,

ā€œWhite highlights a Haā€™aretz report from 2009 which revealed that ā€œIDF officers were receiving legal advice that allowed for large numbers of civilian casualties and the targeting of government buildings.ā€

ā€œThe people who go into a house despite a warning do not have to be taken into account in terms of injury to civilians, because they are voluntary human shields,ā€

said one senior official of the international law division (ILD) of the Israeli Military Advocate Generalā€™s Office.

ā€œFrom the legal point of view, I do not have to show consideration for them. In the case of people who return to their home in order to protect it, they are taking part in the fighting.ā€ (emphasis added)

This statement presupposes that Israel has the right to order people out of their homes, without having to give a justification, without having to prove that it is a military outpost, just an arbitrary pronouncement by the military and either the civilians must flee or be murdered in cold blood by the IDF, in which case they will be referred to as ā€˜human shieldsā€™ and their extrajudicial slaughter justified in the eyes of the military machine and its legal aides; even if the civilian does flee, Israel presupposes the right to destroy their homes, property, and belongings- in other words, their property (and as well their lives) belong to us, because we say so.

According to U.S. Army Manuals terrorism is defined as, the

ā€œcalculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear. It is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies ā€¦ [to attain] political, religious, or ideological goals.ā€ [U.S. Army Field Manual No. FM 3-0, Chapter 9, 37 (14 June 2001).]

Israelā€™s actions are therefore the exact definition of terrorism according to the U.S. army, where even justthe threat of violence to obtain political goals is terrorism; Israel is saying to the civilian population ā€œleave your homes, or else,ā€ while then presupposing that if their orders are not heeded they are thus absolved from the responsibility of the murder which they will then go about committing. Even if they were just to threaten the use of violence to get people out of their homes it would be an extreme terroristic crime, let alone when they actually go through with the bombing, indiscriminate of who is inside.




http://www.globalresearch.ca/israel...ack-civilians-because-they-deserve-it/5394525
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Donā€™t Make Me Shoot You

Nafeez Ahmed reports that,

ā€œWhite highlights a Haā€™aretz report from 2009 which revealed that ā€œIDF officers were receiving legal advice that allowed for large numbers of civilian casualties and the targeting of government buildings.ā€

ā€œThe people who go into a house despite a warning do not have to be taken into account in terms of injury to civilians, because they are voluntary human shields,ā€

said one senior official of the international law division (ILD) of the Israeli Military Advocate Generalā€™s Office.

ā€œFrom the legal point of view, I do not have to show consideration for them. In the case of people who return to their home in order to protect it, they are taking part in the fighting.ā€ (emphasis added)

This statement presupposes that Israel has the right to order people out of their homes, without having to give a justification, without having to prove that it is a military outpost, just an arbitrary pronouncement by the military and either the civilians must flee or be murdered in cold blood by the IDF, in which case they will be referred to as ā€˜human shieldsā€™ and their extrajudicial slaughter justified in the eyes of the military machine and its legal aides; even if the civilian does flee, Israel presupposes the right to destroy their homes, property, and belongings- in other words, their property (and as well their lives) belong to us, because we say so.

According to U.S. Army Manuals terrorism is defined as, the

ā€œcalculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear. It is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies ā€¦ [to attain] political, religious, or ideological goals.ā€ [U.S. Army Field Manual No. FM 3-0, Chapter 9, 37 (14 June 2001).]

Israelā€™s actions are therefore the exact definition of terrorism according to the U.S. army, where even justthe threat of violence to obtain political goals is terrorism; Israel is saying to the civilian population ā€œleave your homes, or else,ā€ while then presupposing that if their orders are not heeded they are thus absolved from the responsibility of the murder which they will then go about committing. Even if they were just to threaten the use of violence to get people out of their homes it would be an extreme terroristic crime, let alone when they actually go through with the bombing, indiscriminate of who is inside.




http://www.globalresearch.ca/israel...ack-civilians-because-they-deserve-it/5394525



Such are the repulsive traits of the Israeli cowards that one is challenged to find words strong enough to describe them...'cowards and monsters' fall so short of the grotesque reality!!
 
Netanyahu explains that, ā€œThe main thing, first of all, is to hit them [the Arabs]. Not just one blow, but blows that are so painful that the price will be too heavy to be borne,ā€ a policy doctrine we are now seeing play out in Israelā€™s current assault on Gaza in which the ā€˜priceā€™ that is intended to be ā€˜too heavy to be borne,ā€™ is measured in the indiscriminate murder of innocent civilian lives- their homes, their playgrounds, their beaches, their schools, their mosques, their hospitals; Israel has shown in Protective Edge that no one and no place in Gaza, not even childrenā€™s playgrounds and hospitals in which no militants whatsoever are present, is immune from the all-powerful roar of the highly-tuned, well-oiled and technologically sophisticated multi-billion dollar US-made killing machine that it has now descended upon the mostly defenseless, economically strangled, and poverty-induced population of Gaza (a WikiLeaks cable quoted an Israeli official in 2008 telling the US that they would ā€œkeep Gazaā€™s economy on the brink of collapse,ā€ to ensure that the economy was ā€œfunctioning at the lowest level possible consistent with avoiding a humanitarian crisis.ā€)


I don't see any link here. How do we know this isn't your fabrication?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Netanyahu explains that, ā€œThe main thing, first of all, is to hit them [the Arabs]. Not just one blow, but blows that are so painful that the price will be too heavy to be borne,ā€ a policy doctrine we are now seeing play out in Israelā€™s current assault on Gaza in which the ā€˜priceā€™ that is intended to be ā€˜too heavy to be borne,ā€™ is measured in the indiscriminate murder of innocent civilian lives- their homes, their playgrounds, their beaches, their schools, their mosques, their hospitals; Israel has shown in Protective Edge that no one and no place in Gaza, not even childrenā€™s playgrounds and hospitals in which no militants whatsoever are present, is immune from the all-powerful roar of the highly-tuned, well-oiled and technologically sophisticated multi-billion dollar US-made killing machine that it has now descended upon the mostly defenseless, economically strangled, and poverty-induced population of Gaza (a WikiLeaks cable quoted an Israeli official in 2008 telling the US that they would ā€œkeep Gazaā€™s economy on the brink of collapse,ā€ to ensure that the economy was ā€œfunctioning at the lowest level possible consistent with avoiding a humanitarian crisis.ā€)


I don't see any link here. How do we know this isn't your fabrication?


Netanyahu is directly quoted here...but yes---of course...who could possibly think that the Israelis who shelled Gaza for weeks on end in the summer of 2014 could ever conspire such cowardice and wanton savagery?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top