The Impending Collapse of the Global Warming scare!!!

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Aug 6, 2009
37,962
6,382
1,140
Not the middle of nowhere
Top story on REALCLEAR right now............:deal:



OMG this is going to be epic sweetness!!!!!:rock::rock::rock::rock::coffee:





"Now the backers of the global warming alarm will not only be called upon to debate, but will face the likelihood of being called before a highly skeptical if not hostile EPA to answer all of the hard questions that they have avoided answering for the last eight years. Questions like: Why are recorded temperatures, particularly from satellites and weather balloons, so much lower than the alarmist models had predicted? How do you explain an almost-20-year "pause" in increasing temperatures even as CO2 emissions have accelerated?"

"So what can we predict about where the climate scare is going? Among members of the environmental movement, when their heads stop exploding, there are plenty of predictions that this will be terrible for the United States:
international ostracism, loss (to China!) of "leadership" in international climate matters, and, domestically, endless litigation battles stalling attempts to rescind or roll back regulations. I see it differently. I predict a high likelihood of substantial collapse of the global warming movement, both domestically and internationally, over the course of the next couple of years"

The Impending Collapse Of The Global Warming Scare




Enjoy the bumpy you fools!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


[URL='http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/cucumber_1.jpg.html'][/URL]
 
If they love their cucumber they can keep their cucumber.
 
The alt and far right cucks will eventually fall on their own swords over their scares.
 
it is all down hill for the warmists from here

--LOL


Its been downhill since 2007.........and have been saying this for more than a decade..........will one day be looked back upon as a fad. The Gore movie will be looked at as the heyday for these people.......the whistles in the graveyard have been getting more muted every year since. At crickets level now............and here comes Scott Pruitt with a whole barrel full of bumpy cucumbers.:funnyface::funnyface:
 
Open debate????

No catch-22 of simply calling someone a denier to dismiss real questions?

Sweet!!!!


Get ready for a slew of 'The Emperor has no clothes' moments as the CAGW monument crumbles to the ground.
 
The numbers based on climate predictions were proved wrong, by Lord Montock and then other scientists agreed when they looked them over.
 
You know something.............for all of the chest pounding around here from the members of the religion, deep down, they know they are fucked. They've been heading down the slope for years now and it just got a lot steeper.........like K9 steep.:ack-1::bye1::bye1:
 
Why is it that only the Trump-cucks constantly create weepy troll threads like this?

Oh, that's right. All the science backs us up, so we can and do talk about the science. We don't have to flap limp-wrists around like skook, in a vain attempt to get people to look away from the science.

And cucks, you really ought to stop lying about the models, being that they've slightly underestimated the warming.

moyhu: Current global temps compared with CMIP 5

rcpmean.png


Now, don't you all have an imminent ice age to predict, like you've been predicting non-stop for the past 40 years? Impressive, how consistent you all are at failing at every single thing.
 
The numbers based on climate predictions were proved wrong, by Lord Montock and then other scientists agreed when they looked them over.
'Lord' Monkton is no more a Lord, than I am. The House of Lords took the unprecedented step of sending him a letter stating that he was not a Lord, and that he had best cease to claim that. Nor is he a scientist. His only credentials are in journalism. He is a liar and a fraud, all the way around.

Climate sceptic Lord Monckton told he's not member of House of Lords

The letter, sent by David Beamish, clerk of the parliaments, to Monckton last Friday and now published on the Lords' website, states: "You are not and have never been a member of the House of Lords. Your assertion that you are a member, but without the right to sit or vote, is a contradiction in terms. No one denies that you are, by virtue of your letters patent, a peer. That is an entirely separate issue to membership of the House. This is borne out by the recent judgement in Baron Mereworth v Ministry of Justice (Crown Office)."

In May, Mr Justice Lewison threw out an action at the Royal Courts of Justice brought by Baron Mereworth, who maintains that it his hereditary entitlement to attend the Lords, despite the House of Lords Act 1999 debarring all but 92 of the 650 hereditary peers, including his late father Lord Oranmore and Browne. Mr Justice Lewison ruled: "In my judgement, the reference [in the House of Lords Act 1999] to a 'member of the House of Lords' is simply a reference to the right to sit and vote in that house … In a nutshell, membership of the House of Lords means the right to sit and vote in that house."
 
Well now, the US is not the only nation in the world with a climate program. If the orange clown and his cabinet of incompetents shut down our program, that of Russia, China, Japan, the EU, Great Britain, and others will continue. And that information will be available on the net. The only way that can be prevented is if the orange clown actually tries to censor the net. And that would put him in direct opposition to the Constitution.
 
You know something.............for all of the chest pounding around here from the members of the religion, deep down, they know they are fucked. They've been heading down the slope for years now and it just got a lot steeper.........like K9 steep.:ack-1::bye1::bye1:
Treehuggers Buggered

Actually, it's K-Y steep, which is the jelly they're going to need to soothe their butthurt.
 
Why is it that only the Trump-cucks constantly create weepy troll threads like this?

Oh, that's right. All the science backs us up, so we can and do talk about the science. We don't have to flap limp-wrists around like skook, in a vain attempt to get people to look away from the science.

And cucks, you really ought to stop lying about the models, being that they've slightly underestimated the warming.

moyhu: Current global temps compared with CMIP 5

rcpmean.png


Now, don't you all have an imminent ice age to predict, like you've been predicting non-stop for the past 40 years? Impressive, how consistent you all are at failing at every single thing.
I'm not predicting an ice age. That would be as foolish as you ignoring that we are in an interglacial cycle and that our present temperature is well below the peak temperatures of previous interglacials, lol.
 
Well now, the US is not the only nation in the world with a climate program. If the orange clown and his cabinet of incompetents shut down our program, that of Russia, China, Japan, the EU, Great Britain, and others will continue. And that information will be available on the net. The only way that can be prevented is if the orange clown actually tries to censor the net. And that would put him in direct opposition to the Constitution.
US emissions could go to zero overnight and the rest of the world would replace it in 5 years. Our emissions have been declining for the past 14 years. Get off your high horse before you break your neck.

upload_2016-12-17_16-22-10.png


upload_2016-12-17_16-22-27.png


upload_2016-12-17_16-22-40.png


upload_2016-12-17_16-22-51.png


upload_2016-12-17_16-23-5.png
 
If they love their cucumber they can keep their cucumber.
If you look at the satellite data in fact there has been no global warming for over 18 years. The Reason they can say it’s the warmest year is because they are using the ground weather station data which is heavily influenced by the Urban Heat Island effect, many of which are near pavement. Even still they had to cherry pick that data to get at the warmest year ever and it is only the warmest by only two-100ths of a degree within a dataset that has a variability of a half of a degree. The fact they they had to ignore accurate data and fudge sketchy data to push their agenda proves (IMHO) that climate change is a hoax.
 
The numbers based on climate predictions were proved wrong, by Lord Montock and then other scientists agreed when they looked them over.
'Lord' Monkton is no more a Lord, than I am. The House of Lords took the unprecedented step of sending him a letter stating that he was not a Lord, and that he had best cease to claim that. Nor is he a scientist. His only credentials are in journalism. He is a liar and a fraud, all the way around.

Climate sceptic Lord Monckton told he's not member of House of Lords

The letter, sent by David Beamish, clerk of the parliaments, to Monckton last Friday and now published on the Lords' website, states: "You are not and have never been a member of the House of Lords. Your assertion that you are a member, but without the right to sit or vote, is a contradiction in terms. No one denies that you are, by virtue of your letters patent, a peer. That is an entirely separate issue to membership of the House. This is borne out by the recent judgement in Baron Mereworth v Ministry of Justice (Crown Office)."

In May, Mr Justice Lewison threw out an action at the Royal Courts of Justice brought by Baron Mereworth, who maintains that it his hereditary entitlement to attend the Lords, despite the House of Lords Act 1999 debarring all but 92 of the 650 hereditary peers, including his late father Lord Oranmore and Browne. Mr Justice Lewison ruled: "In my judgement, the reference [in the House of Lords Act 1999] to a 'member of the House of Lords' is simply a reference to the right to sit and vote in that house … In a nutshell, membership of the House of Lords means the right to sit and vote in that house."


I wonder how many of the other 500+ aristocrats still defiantly claim the title of Lord after their hereditary rights were stripped in 1999?

Lord Moncton knows more about climate science than anyone here, or half of the jokers that call themselves climate scientists.
 
Open debate????

No catch-22 of simply calling someone a denier to dismiss real questions?

Sweet!!!!


Get ready for a slew of 'The Emperor has no clothes' moments as the CAGW monument crumbles to the ground.

Once this is open on the world stage its going to be a huge crash.. Can you imagine the academics like Mann having to openly defend their federal funding of research and the oversight by congress?
 
The alt and far right cucks will eventually fall on their own swords over their scares.


Hmmm........I am suddenly reminded of that scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail.........the black knight part!!:deal:



LMAO...Jake is the black knight fighting the imaginary alt-right that he so fears...getting his ass kicked and it all happens only in his mind.
 

Forum List

Back
Top