Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry I had to spank your ass in front of your snowflake pals. The fact is that while Democrats have invested 4 years f their lives and dragged the nation along behind them on their crusade to undo the 2016 election President Trump has accomplished successes not seen for DECADES in less that 4 years, that not even your /messiah' Barry could do in 8 years.Why talk to the President, the man whose actions have resulted n the strongest economy in decades, the lowest unemployment in decades, the lowest minority unemployment in history, and on and on and on....despite the non-stop 100% commitment by House Democrats to do nothing but undo the 2016 election for the last 4 years?!so? talk is cheap ask Trump.
The Democrats continue to prove all they CAN do is TALK and FAIL to deliver.
thats pretty close to dumber ^^^^^^^^^^^^
point deductions for whining voice.
Sorry I had to spank your ass in front of your snowflake pals. The fact is that while Democrats have invested 4 years f their lives and dragged the nation along behind them on their crusade to undo the 2016 election President Trump has accomplished successes not seen for DECADES in less that 4 years, that not even your /messiah' Barry could do in 8 years.Why talk to the President, the man whose actions have resulted n the strongest economy in decades, the lowest unemployment in decades, the lowest minority unemployment in history, and on and on and on....despite the non-stop 100% commitment by House Democrats to do nothing but undo the 2016 election for the last 4 years?!so? talk is cheap ask Trump.
The Democrats continue to prove all they CAN do is TALK and FAIL to deliver.
thats pretty close to dumber ^^^^^^^^^^^^
point deductions for whining voice.
The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Yes, we know the Dims "discarded it" because they don't want to be held accountable for finding actual crimes. They want to impeach for any arbitrary excuse the come up with in all their chest thumping rhetoric.Seems the Republican program to make impeachment into a criminal process.was just explored and was discarded and now we are back again. That must be the Republican strategy to claim they were ignorant of the fact that impeachment is a political process and not a criminal process, therefore any impeachment decision is invalid.
You mean to say that just because they don't like Trump isn't a law that is impeachable? lolWhen you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.
300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.
Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.
https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf
The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?
I just told you that the referral from Clinton's impeachment listed actual crimes, shit for brains.The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?
That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.
No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?
That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.
I just told you that the referral from Clinton's impeachment listed actual crimes, shit for brains.The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?
That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.
Why are you gloating about Clinton being impeached?
Yes, you were gloating.I just told you that the referral from Clinton's impeachment listed actual crimes, shit for brains.The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.
You're full of shit, of course.
Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?
That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.
And?
Why are you gloating about Clinton being impeached?
I'm not gloating, I asked you a question.
Responding to the same post twice?
The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Irrelevant. It listed actual crimes, not just whining that Starr didn't like Clinton.The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!
A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
The Starr report was supposed to find financial malfeasance by Clinton...Starr spent close to 3 years looking for it and you all had to settle for lying about a blow job.
No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".
I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.
You're full of shit, of course.
Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?
That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.
Yes, you were gloating.I just told you that the referral from Clinton's impeachment listed actual crimes, shit for brains.Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.
How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.
What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?
That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.
And?
Why are you gloating about Clinton being impeached?
I'm not gloating, I asked you a question.
Responding to the same post twice?
BTW, dumbass, if Clinton wasn't hurt, what makes you believe Trump will be? He's raising a fortune off this impeachment scam.
According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!