The Impeachment Report Does Not Cite One Law Violated

[Weatherman2020]

You mean besides the illegal solicitation of foreign assistance in our election, the illegal withholding of military aid, and obstruction of a congressional inquiry? Besides those things?

Do you folks have collective amnesia? Cuz you can't seem to keep these simple facts in your heads.

Cite the law. The report did not.

 

[mascale]

There are 425 footnotes in the report, including citing precedent, (statute): For example footnote 80. The subject of the foot eventually resigned.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, not Stirred!"
(Then mighty, Pharaoh sent the goofy looking prince(?), (just sayin')--reportedly skilled in all the arts of Egypt, (Acts 7)--into some hieroglyphic "Exile" in search of agents to be used to spread the subjugation arithmetic. And so it was even put into "evidence:" of some nature of causal deity, (Deut 23: 12-20). Subjugation had actually created the concept of Pharaoh as some kind deity(?): Cleverly noted by others. The actual report of the arithmetic itself: Happened 1500 years or so later, Matthew 25: 14-30! The missing tapes have yet to be found(?)!)

 

[Care4all]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

That is because its not a court.

That is because its not a court.

Correct, it’s a kangaroo court sham.

it's constitutional, and written in to the constitution to keep the 3 equal branches of govt, equal.

the president has the DOJ who answers to him, and can be corrupt and excuse all crimes of the president....if he orders it...

THAT is why the founders created the impeachment clause, (also why they have oversight and investigator powers like subpoenas
for the House of Representatives), to give them the power to have a 'check' on the President and executive branch.

 

[mudwhistle]

You mean besides the illegal solicitation of foreign assistance in our election, the illegal withholding of military aid, and obstruction of a congressional inquiry? Besides those things?

Do you folks have collective amnesia? Cuz you can't seem to keep these simple facts in your heads.

Yes, the Democrats are guilty of that. Yes, Obama is guilty of that. They had to lie during a Congressional hearing to claim Trump did that.

 

[AntonToo]

You mean besides the illegal solicitation of foreign assistance in our election, the illegal withholding of military aid, and obstruction of a congressional inquiry? Besides those things?

Do you folks have collective amnesia? Cuz you can't seem to keep these simple facts in your heads.

Cite the law. The report did not.

§ 110.20 Prohibition on contributions, donations, expenditures, independent expenditures, and disbursements by foreign nationals (52 U.S.C. 30121, 36 U.S.C. 510).
Solicitation, acceptance, or receipt of contributions and donations from foreign nationals. No person shall knowingly solicit, accept, or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation prohibited by paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.

52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals


18 U.S.C. § 201(b): The Federal Bribery Statute
Whoever — (2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for: (A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;

https://www.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/public-integrity/a_guide_to_commonly_used_federal_statutes_in_public_corruption_cases.pdf


Obstructing Congressional or Administrative Proceedings (18 U.S.C. 1505)
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which 2. any pending proceeding is being had 3. before any department or agency of the United States, or B. 1. the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which 2. any inquiry or investigation is being had 3. by a. either House, or b. any committee of either House or c. any joint committee of the Congress shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years (not more than 8 years if the offense involves domestic or international terrorism), or both.89

Obstruction of Congress: A Brief Overview of Federal Law Relating to Interference with Congressional Activities

 

[Siete]

The Impeachment Report Does Not Cite One Law Violated


derp derp derp ^^^^^^^^

doesnt have to-

impeachment isnt a criminal trial in a court of law.

of course THEIR & THEY'RE fucks with inbred rw morons so naturally anything more complex than that TOTALLY ESCAPES THEM.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

As always........
"All that is required for evil men to prevail is for the vast majority of men who call themselves 'Good Men', to do nothing"

Have you done anything lately?
The Revolutionary War was not won by "Good Men" who sat home and complained of tyranny.

Doing nothing is the very best way you can show your support for a Tyrant and evil men.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Tyrants don't care if you're right....or on the side of the law. Your first mistake is thinking they do.
All they care about is prevailing....at ANY cost.

We are witnessing two incredible events in history.....
1). Corrupt men systematically dismantling a once proud and powerful nation by any means necessary
2). A lack of action by "good men" to stop these tyrants, and thus by proxy, their acceptance..... as the world has never seen

 

[easyt65]

SCHIFF'S HEARING:
- No crime
- No evidence of a crime committed
- No witness, no one who witnessed anything
- Schiff's 'witnesses' could not name 1 crime or 1 'High Crime and Misdemeanor' committed by the President
- Schiff's State Dept 'Witness' stated he found no crime / abuse of power by the President but the Bidens need to be investigated

NADLER'S HEARING:
- 3 Democratic Party-donating, professed past Trump-hating Liberal Progressive Socialist Democrat Extremist University Professors who gave their OPINION that the President should be Impeached

- 1 DEMOCRAT / Democrat Party-Supporting/Voting Constitutional Scholar who testified there is no crime, no crime committed by the President,. no crime and no abuse of Constitutional power by the President, no evidence of any abuse of Constitutional power by the President, the fastest rushed weakest Impeachment case in US history, a Democrat-created process that goes against the Constitution and Rule of law - not an American process but rather one seen in socialist / soviet-style governments...who testified what the Democrats are doing is 'DANGROUS' to our Republic and that the only ones who have abused their power in all of this is the DEMOCRATS!

Pelosi declares they have no option but to proceed with Impeachment....

Democrats - 4 years of proving they are a criminal organization and an enemy of the state, not a political party!

 

[Weatherman2020]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

That is because its not a court.

That is because its not a court.

Correct, it’s a kangaroo court sham.

it's constitutional, and written in to the constitution to keep the 3 equal branches of govt, equal.

the president has the DOJ who answers to him, and can be corrupt and excuse all crimes of the president....if he orders it...

THAT is why the founders created the impeachment clause, (also why they have oversight and investigator powers like subpoenas
for the House of Representatives), to give them the power to have a 'check' on the President and executive branch.

What are you rambling about? Now the President violates the Constitution? How come in a 300 page report it says no such thing? Cite the Constitutional violations for us since the report does not.

 

[easyt65]

'The Impeachment Report Does Not Cite One Law Violated'

Neither did either Dem Coup Committee hearing.....

 

[Dragonlady]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

How many times do you need to be told, impeachment is NOT a criminal proceeding, but a politican one. Abuse of power isn't criminal, but it is impeachable.

 

[easyt65]

How many times do you need to be told, impeachment is NOT a criminal proceeding, but a politican one.

How many times do you need to be challenged to post the link / evidence to support your and Schiff's claim that a law exists affording non-qualifying 'Whistle Blowers' anonymity and immunity?

You two made the claim - neither one has stepped up to prove it. BOTH have fled and refused to address it again....

.

 

[jc456]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

And?

Exactly

 

[easyt65]

How many times do you need to be told, impeachment is NOT a criminal proceeding, but a political one.

...and the Democrats have proven they have mutated the intent and Standards for Impeachment set by the Founding Fathers into a Partisan / Party-1st attack against the republic, Constitution, and Rule of Law in an attempt to seize power.

Democrat Constitutional Expert Turley proved / testified, as we all saw, the Democrats failed to prove a crime or abuse of power was committed by the President, failed to provide evidence of such a crime or abuse - according to the Constitution and Law, and failed to produce any witnesses.

Turley testified that what the Democrats are doing jeopardizes our national security, our republic, calling it 'DANGEROUS', and that the only ones who have abused their powers has been the Democratic Party.

Much like the entire 4 years of non-stop failed coup attempts and investigations by the Democrats, these hearings only exposed DEMOCRAT crimes and that the last 4 years have been a self/party-serving POLITICAL (as you admitted) crusade to overturn the election results of the 2016 Presidential election.

Even Nadler himself declared that Impeaching a President so near an election is tantamount to stripping the Constitutional right to vote and choose their own leaders from the hands of the American voters!

...as long as it benefits Democrats, then f* it, right?!

 

[Siete]

How many times do you need to be told, impeachment is NOT a criminal proceeding, but a politican one.

How many times do you need to be challenged to post the link / evidence to support your and Schiff's claim that a law exists affording non-qualifying 'Whistle Blowers' anonymity and immunity?

You two made the claim - neither one has stepped up to prove it. BOTH have fled and refused to address it again....

.

its an investigation you moron - proof isnt necessary

articles of impeachment have yet to be decided.

like your daddy, you dont know your ass from Alabama.

 

[easyt65]

its an investigation you moron - proof isnt necessary.

ACTUALLY it's a PROCESS to remove the President from office.

The Democrats declared in 2017, 5 minutes after the president took his oath of office, that they were going to IMPEACH the President.
Talib did not say 'We're going to INVESSTIGATE the SOB' - she said 'We are going to IMPEACH' the SOB'.

Are these lies what you tell yourself to help you swallow the debunked proven lies and crimes perpetrated by the Democrats?

 

[Siete]

its an investigation you moron - proof isnt necessary.

ACTUALLY it's a PROCESS to remove the President from office.

The Democrats declared in 2017, 5 minutes after the president took his oath of office, that they were going to IMPEACH the President.
Talib did not say 'We're going to INVESSTIGATE the SOB' - she said 'We are going to IMPEACH' the SOB'.

Are these lies what you tell yourself to help you swallow the debunked proven lies and crimes perpetrated by the Democrats?

so? talk is cheap ask Trump.

admit it, complex issues like impeachment proceedings arent your forte' are they .......

now try hard and say something thats dumber than your "she said" bullshit.

 

[easyt65]

so? talk is cheap ask Trump.

Why talk to the President, the man whose actions have resulted n the strongest economy in decades, the lowest unemployment in decades, the lowest minority unemployment in history, and on and on and on....despite the non-stop 100% commitment by House Democrats to do nothing but undo the 2016 election for the last 4 years?!

The Democrats continue to prove all they CAN do is TALK and FAIL to deliver.

 

[Siete]

so? talk is cheap ask Trump.

Why talk to the President, the man whose actions have resulted n the strongest economy in decades, the lowest unemployment in decades, the lowest minority unemployment in history, and on and on and on....despite the non-stop 100% commitment by House Democrats to do nothing but undo the 2016 election for the last 4 years?!

The Democrats continue to prove all they CAN do is TALK and FAIL to deliver.

thats pretty close to dumber ^^^^^^^^^^^^

point deductions for whining voice.