The Impeachment Report Does Not Cite One Law Violated

[IM2]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

This shows how ignorant some of us are about the government and constitution. trump has obstructed congress and I believe that was mentioned along with many other things. Your "they have no evidence" line is a lie. Period.

Cite the law then, Dufus. The 300 page report skipped that for some reason. Let Schiff know too.

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

 

[IM2]

My bet is that the Rosenstein report will lead to a special counsel and Nancy will see one D member after another indicted for sedition.

Nancy herself will be facing charges from violating the Logan Act when she told people at the Paris Climate Accord we are not leaving a direct conflict of Trumps claim.

No she won't.

 

[Siete]

the president has been jury tampering for weeks, with the R senators, offering them weekends at camp David, where they can strategize....

since when is jury tampering ok?

the Senators ARE THE JURY, they do not present the trial, they are not the president's defense, contrary to his belief.... the president will have his own lawyers and defense team... the Senators are JURORS and he should not be trying to bribe them with niceties at camp David or be strategizing with the jury!

SHAME ON THOSE REPUBLICAN SENATORS!

Cite the law then, the 300 page report skipped that for some strange reason.

trying to bump jc out of his dumb'st mf'r on the planet award aint ya snotbubble.

 

[rightwinger]

Bribery is a good place to start

 

[Weatherman2020]

the president has been jury tampering for weeks, with the R senators, offering them weekends at camp David, where they can strategize....

since when is jury tampering ok?

the Senators ARE THE JURY, they do not present the trial, they are not the president's defense, contrary to his belief.... the president will have his own lawyers and defense team... the Senators are JURORS and he should not be trying to bribe them with niceties at camp David or be strategizing with the jury!

SHAME ON THOSE REPUBLICAN SENATORS!

Cite the law then, the 300 page report skipped that for some strange reason.

trying to bump jc out of his dumb'st mf'r on the planet award aint ya snotbubble.

I can’t cite any law violated either.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Bribery is a good place to start

Cite the law and the offense. Your 300 page report skipped that for some reason.

 

[Weatherman2020]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

This shows how ignorant some of us are about the government and constitution. trump has obstructed congress and I believe that was mentioned along with many other things. Your "they have no evidence" line is a lie. Period.

Cite the law then, Dufus. The 300 page report skipped that for some reason. Let Schiff know too.

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

Thanks for admitting the impeachment attempt is really a coup attempt.

 

[bripat9643]

I just told you that the referral from Clinton's impeachment listed actual crimes, shit for brains.

And?

Why are you gloating about Clinton being impeached?

I'm not gloating, I asked you a question.

Responding to the same post twice?

Yes, you were gloating.

BTW, dumbass, if Clinton wasn't hurt, what makes you believe Trump will be? He's raising a fortune off this impeachment scam.

Clinton's approval rating during the whole process was in the 60s and even hit 71 twice. And not just in one single poll

All your proving is that impeachment is meaningless.

While Clinton's followers were not a dedicated and zealous as you Trump followers, he had a much larger part of the country that liked him. He won by far larger margins than Trump did in the EC and actually won the popular vote as well.

What was true for him may not be true for Trump.

Clinton has the entire media on his side. Yeah, it was obviously easier for him. However, Trump's polls have bee improving since the show trials began. Trump has always had a harder row to hoe than Clinton. Every Republican has the deck stacked

 

[bripat9643]

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

SURE IT DOES- YOURE JUST AN IDIOT.

Horseshit.

 

[IM2]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

This shows how ignorant some of us are about the government and constitution. trump has obstructed congress and I believe that was mentioned along with many other things. Your "they have no evidence" line is a lie. Period.

Cite the law then, Dufus. The 300 page report skipped that for some reason. Let Schiff know too.

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

Thanks for admitting the impeachment attempt is really a coup attempt.

Wrong.

The constitution makes it so impeachment is political. Impeachment is a legitimate procedure to check a corrupt president. It is a disciplinary action taken when a president violates company policy.

 

[Siete]

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

SURE IT DOES- YOURE JUST AN IDIOT.

Horseshit.

it says it from square one you dumb shit -

and these derps want to deal the cards

 

[Weatherman2020]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

This shows how ignorant some of us are about the government and constitution. trump has obstructed congress and I believe that was mentioned along with many other things. Your "they have no evidence" line is a lie. Period.

Cite the law then, Dufus. The 300 page report skipped that for some reason. Let Schiff know too.

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

Thanks for admitting the impeachment attempt is really a coup attempt.

Wrong.

The constitution makes it so impeachment is political. Impeachment is a legitimate procedure to check a corrupt president. It is a disciplinary action taken when a president violates company policy.

High crimes and misdemeanors.

You hating him meet that requirement? Damn, we should have impeached Obama.

 

[IM2]

And?

I'm not gloating, I asked you a question.

Responding to the same post twice?

Yes, you were gloating.

BTW, dumbass, if Clinton wasn't hurt, what makes you believe Trump will be? He's raising a fortune off this impeachment scam.

Clinton's approval rating during the whole process was in the 60s and even hit 71 twice. And not just in one single poll

All your proving is that impeachment is meaningless.

While Clinton's followers were not a dedicated and zealous as you Trump followers, he had a much larger part of the country that liked him. He won by far larger margins than Trump did in the EC and actually won the popular vote as well.

What was true for him may not be true for Trump.

Clinton has the entire media on his side. Yeah, it was obviously easier for him. However, Trump's polls have bee improving since the show trials began. Trump has always had a harder row to hoe than Clinton. Every Republican has the deck stacked

Clintons impeachment made no sense. You guys will be disingenuous about this, but the bottom line is Clinton lied about having a consensual relationship outside of marriage. Republicans don't have any deck stacked. And trump is president after losing, so neither he or you can whine about how unfair things are for trump.

 

[bripat9643]

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

the whole country knows they do have Trump, on several impeachable things like soliciting a foreign country to help him in his own 2020 election bid.

your side KNOWS he did this as well, you just don't care about our constitution and future of our Nation....

Only dumbasses know that. The show trial convinced the public that he didn't.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, you were gloating.

BTW, dumbass, if Clinton wasn't hurt, what makes you believe Trump will be? He's raising a fortune off this impeachment scam.

Clinton's approval rating during the whole process was in the 60s and even hit 71 twice. And not just in one single poll

All your proving is that impeachment is meaningless.

While Clinton's followers were not a dedicated and zealous as you Trump followers, he had a much larger part of the country that liked him. He won by far larger margins than Trump did in the EC and actually won the popular vote as well.

What was true for him may not be true for Trump.

Clinton has the entire media on his side. Yeah, it was obviously easier for him. However, Trump's polls have bee improving since the show trials began. Trump has always had a harder row to hoe than Clinton. Every Republican has the deck stacked

Clintons impeachment made no sense. You guys will be disingenuous about this, but the bottom line is Clinton lied about having a consensual relationship outside of marriage. Republicans don't have any deck stacked. And trump is president after losing, so neither he or you can whine about how unfair things are for trump.

He lied under oath, which is perjury, and then he tried to cover it up. He committed a number of crimes. However, in the end, it turned out not to be worth the effort.

 

[IM2]

This shows how ignorant some of us are about the government and constitution. trump has obstructed congress and I believe that was mentioned along with many other things. Your "they have no evidence" line is a lie. Period.

Cite the law then, Dufus. The 300 page report skipped that for some reason. Let Schiff know too.

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

Thanks for admitting the impeachment attempt is really a coup attempt.

Wrong.

The constitution makes it so impeachment is political. Impeachment is a legitimate procedure to check a corrupt president. It is a disciplinary action taken when a president violates company policy.

High crimes and misdemeanors.

You hating him meet that requirement? Damn, we should have impeached Obama.

He's committed high crimes and misdemeanors. This impeachment is not about hating trump. You couldn't impeach Obama. He didn't do what trump has done. If Obama had been president, he would have been impeached after he fired Comey.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Yup, I keep asking that question, no regressive can answer it. What is the actual law broken?

I can’t wait for the next “whitelash” after this farce.

You don't need to wait. The next Democrat primary is all white.

 

[IM2]

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

the whole country knows they do have Trump, on several impeachable things like soliciting a foreign country to help him in his own 2020 election bid.

your side KNOWS he did this as well, you just don't care about our constitution and future of our Nation....

Only dumbasses know that. The show trial convinced the public that he didn't.

No it hasn't.

 

[IM2]

Clinton's approval rating during the whole process was in the 60s and even hit 71 twice. And not just in one single poll

All your proving is that impeachment is meaningless.

While Clinton's followers were not a dedicated and zealous as you Trump followers, he had a much larger part of the country that liked him. He won by far larger margins than Trump did in the EC and actually won the popular vote as well.

What was true for him may not be true for Trump.

Clinton has the entire media on his side. Yeah, it was obviously easier for him. However, Trump's polls have bee improving since the show trials began. Trump has always had a harder row to hoe than Clinton. Every Republican has the deck stacked

Clintons impeachment made no sense. You guys will be disingenuous about this, but the bottom line is Clinton lied about having a consensual relationship outside of marriage. Republicans don't have any deck stacked. And trump is president after losing, so neither he or you can whine about how unfair things are for trump.

He lied under oath, which is perjury, and then he tried to cover it up. He committed a number of crimes. However, in the end, it turned out not to be worth the effort.

Like I said, you guys will be disingenuous about this.

 

[bripat9643]

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

the whole country knows they do have Trump, on several impeachable things like soliciting a foreign country to help him in his own 2020 election bid.

your side KNOWS he did this as well, you just don't care about our constitution and future of our Nation....

How can the whole country know what isn't true?