The history of global "warming": Has Al Gore seen this chart?

[skookerasbil]

So much winning on this thread.............

 

[Redfish]

the temperature cycles make a point. That point is that the climate of our planet has been cycling up and down for hundreds of millions of years. The far left claim that man is causing what may or may not be a current rising cycle is the height of ignorance.

Wrong. It is the unavoidable conclusion to which the evidence points. The evidence tells us that it is NOT Milankovitch Cycle warming. The evidence tells us that it is NOT increased solar irradiation.

Sure, some random event like you suggest could change the cycle. Although I have serious doubts about aliens putting up a heat shield.

You missed my point entirely. The point is that human GHG emissions are unprecedented. You cannot conclude that because human GHG emissions have never warmed the planet before, they are not warming it now. THAT is "the height of ignorance.

As to Trump, he has already proven to be a better president than obozo or bushie. and he is not yet sworn in.

Trump, despite having yet to be sworn in, has shown us all that he is the most ignorant fool to have ever been elected. A good case could be made that this nation has just committed suicide.

Wrong on all counts. But you are free to buy into the hype and hoax if you choose.

CO2 makes up .039% of the earth's atmosphere. It has been at that same concentration for as long as we can measure it using carbon dating, ice cores, etc. Plants cannot survive without CO2, humans exhale it. Combustion releases it. It is a naturally occurring clear, odorless, tasteless gas.

But not one of you libs has answered the very basic question. Why do you need to create a false link between pollution and climate in order to take on pollution?

 

[Crick]

Show us evidence suggesting any other cause is responsible for the majority of the warming of the last century.

Your question is worthless because you haven't demonstrated that "libs" have created any such false link. The denier meme that CO2 isn't pollution and thus the effort to reduce CO2 emissions is unjustified is semantic bullshit.

Just as with your claims regarding warming, just saying it doesn't make it so. My evidence may be neatly found at www.ipcc.ch under Working Group I of AR5, "The Physical Science Basis".

 

[Redfish]

Show us evidence suggesting any other cause is responsible for the majority of the warming of the last century.

Your question is worthless because you haven't demonstrated that "libs" have created any such false link. The denier meme that CO2 isn't pollution and thus the effort to reduce CO2 emissions is unjustified is semantic bullshit.

is it daylight where you are? is it cloudy or sunny? If daylight and sunny, look up in the sky. See that big ball of fire? Its called the sun. IT controls the climate of our planet, not a coal fired power plant in China or a soccer mom driving a huge SUV full of kids.

One solar flare has more affect on the earth than all of the fossil fuel consumed by man in the last 1000 years.

The FACT that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has not changed disproves your THEORY about evil greenhouse gases. The FACT that the Antarctic ice sheet has grown disproves your THEORY about AGW.

But once again, why not attack the real problem? Why not advocate for reducing pollution in order to keep the air and water clean? You don't need the false link to climate to attack pollution. No one wants a polluted environment and you fools hurt that cause with the climate change bullshit.

 

[ding]

Show us evidence suggesting any other cause is responsible for the majority of the warming of the last century.

Your question is worthless because you haven't demonstrated that "libs" have created any such false link. The denier meme that CO2 isn't pollution and thus the effort to reduce CO2 emissions is unjustified is semantic bullshit.

It is called the interglacial cycle and I wouldn't be surprised if global temperatures rose another 1.4C to 2.4C because of it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Show us evidence suggesting any other cause is responsible for the majority of the warming of the last century.

Your question is worthless because you haven't demonstrated that "libs" have created any such false link. The denier meme that CO2 isn't pollution and thus the effort to reduce CO2 emissions is unjustified is semantic bullshit.

Just as with your claims regarding warming, just saying it doesn't make it so. My evidence may be neatly found at www.ipcc.ch under Working Group I of AR5, "The Physical Science Basis".

You ignorant idiots point at a gas which has little weight and is a small composition of our atmosphere and ignore water vapor and the sun.. The failed modeling of the IPCC is not science, its conjecture and socialist control agenda intermixed... When you are shown real science you defend pseudo-socalism... Ignorance is bliss I guess..

 

[skookerasbil]

climate change is real. The OP proved that. Man made climate change is a hoax, the OP proved that as well.

the climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years and will be changing hundreds of millions of years from now. Man has never had anything to do with it.

And ignoring it means we are not preparing our coastal areas for high water, nor our interiors for wildfires, or violent storms. You guys say screw the infrastructure, and you HAVE.

Wrong, we should prepare as best we can for acts of nature. But to think we can control them is fantasy. To think that we can stop the earth from warming or cooling is the height of ignorance.

My problem with the libs on this is that they have created a false connection between pollution (a real problem) and climate. Why not attack the real problem?

The height of ignorance is the willingness to ignore evidence in favor of some political alternative universe. When every single Scientific Society, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities are stating that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger, and you have an entirely opposite opinion, then perhaps you should rethink your opinion.

Pollution is real, AGW is a hoax. There is no proven link between that acts of man and climate. There is a clear indisputable link between pollution and dirty unsafe air and water. Why do you need to make up a link to climate in order to attack pollution?

Dear Repubtard Idiot! Man can & does change the earth & climate. Just look at aerial images & plat maps from the early 1900s & compare them to Google Earth. We can create a Nuclear Winter in a matter of minutes.

Idiot?

s0n.....how about this.......nobody is giving a fuck about climate change in 2016. Its the only thing that matters. Its nothing more than an internet hobby at this point..........and now here comes President Trump so it becomes even more laughable.

You maybe freaked out about the climate along with about 194 other people.........but most of the people in this country have real responsibilities and far, far, far more real things to worry about.

How would you like me to post up the latest PEW poll on how many people believe in AGW?


If nobody is caring..........the science doesn't matter for dick!!

 

[skookerasbil]

December 5, 2016
Many Americans are skeptical about scientific research on climate and GM foods
By Brian Kennedy and Cary Funk3 comments


"In the public eye, there is considerable disagreement among scientists in both areas. Just 27% of Americans say that almost all climate scientists agree human behavior is mostly responsible for climate change"

Many Americans are skeptical about scientific research on climate and GM foods




Who exactly are the idiots????