skookerasbil
Platinum Member
So much winning on this thread.............
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the temperature cycles make a point. That point is that the climate of our planet has been cycling up and down for hundreds of millions of years. The far left claim that man is causing what may or may not be a current rising cycle is the height of ignorance.
Wrong. It is the unavoidable conclusion to which the evidence points. The evidence tells us that it is NOT Milankovitch Cycle warming. The evidence tells us that it is NOT increased solar irradiation.
Sure, some random event like you suggest could change the cycle. Although I have serious doubts about aliens putting up a heat shield.
You missed my point entirely. The point is that human GHG emissions are unprecedented. You cannot conclude that because human GHG emissions have never warmed the planet before, they are not warming it now. THAT is "the height of ignorance.
As to Trump, he has already proven to be a better president than obozo or bushie. and he is not yet sworn in.
Trump, despite having yet to be sworn in, has shown us all that he is the most ignorant fool to have ever been elected. A good case could be made that this nation has just committed suicide.
Show us evidence suggesting any other cause is responsible for the majority of the warming of the last century.
Your question is worthless because you haven't demonstrated that "libs" have created any such false link. The denier meme that CO2 isn't pollution and thus the effort to reduce CO2 emissions is unjustified is semantic bullshit.
It is called the interglacial cycle and I wouldn't be surprised if global temperatures rose another 1.4C to 2.4C because of it.Show us evidence suggesting any other cause is responsible for the majority of the warming of the last century.
Your question is worthless because you haven't demonstrated that "libs" have created any such false link. The denier meme that CO2 isn't pollution and thus the effort to reduce CO2 emissions is unjustified is semantic bullshit.
You ignorant idiots point at a gas which has little weight and is a small composition of our atmosphere and ignore water vapor and the sun.. The failed modeling of the IPCC is not science, its conjecture and socialist control agenda intermixed... When you are shown real science you defend pseudo-socalism... Ignorance is bliss I guess..Show us evidence suggesting any other cause is responsible for the majority of the warming of the last century.
Your question is worthless because you haven't demonstrated that "libs" have created any such false link. The denier meme that CO2 isn't pollution and thus the effort to reduce CO2 emissions is unjustified is semantic bullshit.
Just as with your claims regarding warming, just saying it doesn't make it so. My evidence may be neatly found at www.ipcc.ch under Working Group I of AR5, "The Physical Science Basis".
The height of ignorance is the willingness to ignore evidence in favor of some political alternative universe. When every single Scientific Society, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities are stating that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger, and you have an entirely opposite opinion, then perhaps you should rethink your opinion.climate change is real. The OP proved that. Man made climate change is a hoax, the OP proved that as well.
the climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years and will be changing hundreds of millions of years from now. Man has never had anything to do with it.
And ignoring it means we are not preparing our coastal areas for high water, nor our interiors for wildfires, or violent storms. You guys say screw the infrastructure, and you HAVE.
Wrong, we should prepare as best we can for acts of nature. But to think we can control them is fantasy. To think that we can stop the earth from warming or cooling is the height of ignorance.
My problem with the libs on this is that they have created a false connection between pollution (a real problem) and climate. Why not attack the real problem?
Pollution is real, AGW is a hoax. There is no proven link between that acts of man and climate. There is a clear indisputable link between pollution and dirty unsafe air and water. Why do you need to make up a link to climate in order to attack pollution?
Dear Repubtard Idiot! Man can & does change the earth & climate. Just look at aerial images & plat maps from the early 1900s & compare them to Google Earth. We can create a Nuclear Winter in a matter of minutes.