Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
You dont know much about economics huh?
it seems, neither do you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You dont know much about economics huh?
LOL! She just gave you the facts, now you ridicule? Have you no shame?Having debt is better than dying.
What you suggest we do is certain death for the US
OH MY GAWWWWD!!!!!!
cutting government spending will mean the death of the united states.
AAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!
people keeping more of their own money will be the death of the United States
HEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPP MMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Please take ALL my money
I DON"T WANNA DIEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
LOL! She just gave you the facts, now you ridicule? Have you no shame?Having debt is better than dying.
What you suggest we do is certain death for the US
OH MY GAWWWWD!!!!!!
cutting government spending will mean the death of the united states.
AAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!
people keeping more of their own money will be the death of the United States
HEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPP MMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Please take ALL my money
I DON"T WANNA DIEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
Every pearl of wisdom that she clatters on her keyboard are facts and truths that if you don't heed, will burn, burn your brain! Seriously. Be careful.LOL! She just gave you the facts, now you ridicule? Have you no shame?OH MY GAWWWWD!!!!!!
cutting government spending will mean the death of the united states.
AAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!
people keeping more of their own money will be the death of the United States
HEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPP MMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Please take ALL my money
I DON"T WANNA DIEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
what facts?
what part of "having debt is better than dying" is a fact?
You guys got us into this with your "tax cuts" now you claim it will get us out?
Have you any idea just how foolish you sound?
and why is it in there?
You see they try to please the republicans and what do they get in return? scorn.
Soon we will stop wasting our time and just do what needs to be done without you.
You see they try to please the republicans and what do they get in return? scorn.
Soon we will stop wasting our time and just do what needs to be done without you.
now that's funny because Dims and Puds seem to be doing the same thing these days
Oh yeah they are doing the same things ?
Why the fuck are the Rs so pissed about whats going on then?
and why is it in there?
why to "stimulate" of course.
what both Dimocrats and Repudlicans can't seem to fathom is that tax cuts must be accompanied by spending cuts in order to work.
but both parties seem to do the same thing and yet each blames the other.
now THAT'S foolish
And you are ignoring the numbers that prove FDR was right.
This negates all the silly bullshit you are spewing so that you can feel like you know something that everyone else is too dense to see.
You are seeing this from your own emotional shortcomings instead of the facts.
You're seeing things through ideological lenses. Read what Rothbard wrote on the Depression:
an excerpt: Hoover's Attack on Laissez-Faire - Murray N. Rothbard - Mises Institute
Numbers prove that the economy was recovering until 1936, agreed. But I fail to see the correlation between that and FDR's policies. Logic tells me that if FDR's policies were the reason for recovery, it wouldn't have taken 9 years for recovery to happen. So the conclusion that can be reached is that FDR's policies impeded recovery, as it was trying hard to happen, and had seen some light in a reduction of unemployment during the years, but was ultimately blocked by FDR until 1945.
I thought the new revisionist history was to say that the New Deal wasn't big enough, and that's why it took 9 years? Only WWII was large enough to pull our economy out of depression? When revisionists agree on how history transpired, let me know.
MISES!!!!!!
when will you guys learn that they are partisan hacks?
and why is it in there?
why to "stimulate" of course.
what both Dimocrats and Repudlicans can't seem to fathom is that tax cuts must be accompanied by spending cuts in order to work.
but both parties seem to do the same thing and yet each blames the other.
now THAT'S foolish
I know next to nothing about economics so I have to get that out of the way. But isn't the idea that in recession the government must try and stimulate a recessive economy? It does that by increasing its own spending - it thereby engages providers who otherwise would be lying idle. And it cuts taxes I suppose to encourage people to spend the increased money they have, again to have providers of goods and services engaged in providing goods and services that might have - as I said before - lain idle. And when the economy is growing again the government can cut back on its spending and then gain from the increased economic activity as money flows back into its coffers.
That's only my non-technical understanding.