Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The adult tissues reported to contain stem cells include brain, bone marrow, peripheral blood, blood vessels, skeletal muscle, skin and liver.
He may be the Obama of the Repub party without the brains cause Jindal isn't exactly an intellectual stud by any stretch
Wow, someone needs an anger management course! I was referring to the fact that he wants Creationism taught in schools, that alone - to me, makes me think he's not an intellectual stud. Is that better nutjob?
sounds like they'd have to be dead to obtain the stem cells huh.
perhaps embryonic stem cells are used because they are seemingly untainted. Aren't the embryos that are used for this research going to be destroyed anyway too? if they can help those who are living isn't that a good thing?
Does Jindal think frozen embryos are "snowflake babies?"
He has a Biology degree from Brown University. Do you really think he thinks that?
Sounds like it.
His policies are the same as Bush's.
Chris, specifically which policies?
As far as your embryo comment, well why do that to yourself?
According to a small article in our local TBT (tampa bay times) it appears that the GOP think Mr. Jindal is the future of the Republican party....their very own Obama or so they say.
I don't see this happening. not if what they say his view are turn out to be accurate. he's against abortion without exception, he's against stem cell research and he's for teaching creationism in schools.
This guy sounds like the kind of rightwing nutter that the GOP should be running away from not running towards.
are you sure those things (in the OP) are what he really believes?sounds like they'd have to be dead to obtain the stem cells huh.
perhaps embryonic stem cells are used because they are seemingly untainted. Aren't the embryos that are used for this research going to be destroyed anyway too? if they can help those who are living isn't that a good thing?
Yes, creationism can be taught in schools along with the big bang theory.
There are fundamental differences in the nature of the two ideas.
One is based on some actual evidence and is subject to change. One is based on a text and is not subject to change.
One is science, one isn't. Teach creationism - fine - but not in science because it ain't.
Thank you, someone with reason. Look, if anyone out there thinks creationism should be taught in schools as "history" then you're absolutely nutsAccording to a small article in our local TBT (tampa bay times) it appears that the GOP think Mr. Jindal is the future of the Republican party....their very own Obama or so they say.
I don't see this happening. not if what they say his view are turn out to be accurate. he's against abortion without exception, he's against stem cell research and he's for teaching creationism in schools.
This guy sounds like the kind of rightwing nutter that the GOP should be running away from not running towards.
The Journey, a megachurch of mostly younger evangelicals, is representative of a new generation that refuses to put politics at the center of its faith and rejects identification with the religious right.
They say they are tired of the culture wars. They say they do not want the test of their faith to be the fight against gay rights. They say they want to broaden the traditional evangelical anti-abortion agenda to include care for the poor, the environment, immigrants and people with H.I.V., according to experts on younger evangelicals and the young people themselves.
According to a small article in our local TBT (tampa bay times) it appears that the GOP think Mr. Jindal is the future of the Republican party....their very own Obama or so they say.
I don't see this happening. not if what they say his view are turn out to be accurate. he's against abortion without exception, he's against stem cell research and he's for teaching creationism in schools.
This guy sounds like the kind of rightwing nutter that the GOP should be running away from not running towards.
"There are things the Republicans Party needs to do. It needs to match its action to its rhetoric," said Jindal. "It claims to be the party against out of control spending and for cutting taxes, yet it defends spending it would have never let the other side propose without criticizing."
In addition, Jindal argued that Republicans need to focus more on pocketbook issues that motivate voters, particularly during the economic meltdown sweeping the nation.
"It needs to be a party of solutions," he said. "It needs to apply conservative principles to problems like the rising cost of health care, the national economic challenge and other challenges facing our country that American families care about."
He warned against partisan Republicans who argue for moving quickly to bash Obama at every turn.
"It can't be just the party of no," said Jindal. "It just can't go to Washington and oppose, it has to propose solutions."
I think there are a lot of people focused on what the Republican Party can do to improve itself," said Jindal. "I think the focus ought to be on what we can do to strengthen America."
"I'm not here to beat up our federal partners, it's not about pointing fingers," said Jindal.
are you sure those things (in the OP) are what he really believes?
*yawn*
Don't know who the GOP's candidate will be in 4 years so just start smearing them all now, huh? Sounds like a typical leftwing nutter.
