The fascists are at it again

It's bad enough the right wing conservatives, alt-right, and white supremacists are tools of 'dark money' but come on fools at least learn what terms mean. Fascism is of the right, even an old hero to the far right acknowledged that, Adolph hated liberals and communists same as you suckers.
Like all progressives - you are astoundingly ignorant/uneducated. Nazi stood for National Socialists. Is socialism not left-wing, you dimwit?

Second, the further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker (libertarian) until it ceases to exist at all (anarchist). Fascism is complete and total centralized government control. It's totalitarianism. You cannot have small, limited government totalitarianism, you idiot.
 
It's bad enough the right wing conservatives, alt-right, and white supremacists are tools of 'dark money' but come on fools at least learn what terms mean. Fascism is of the right, even an old hero to the far right acknowledged that, Adolph hated liberals and communists same as you suckers.
Like all progressives - you are astoundingly ignorant/uneducated. Nazi stood for National Socialists. Is socialism not left-wing, you dimwit?

Second, the further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker (libertarian) until it ceases to exist at all (anarchist). Fascism is complete and total centralized government control. It's totalitarianism. You cannot have small, limited government totalitarianism, you idiot.
Sure you can, if you have a very small limited country..
 
The Supreme Court made it clear that schools can disciple kids for what happens outside of school time . They have a duty to create a safe atmosphere at school.
Yes folks...little Timmy really is that stupid. If it happened outside of school, it's not posting any threat to the atmosphere at school.
 
The parents want to control their kids also, yet that is not fascism or the left to you..

Lessee, who should discipline children? Parents or the state..?
The state is not punishing the kids, the school is, and schools are run by local school boards by people democratically elected to represent their district..

Should have been kept private, between the school administration and the parents but now the media is in on it and everyone in that school knows who they are.
Good, if any blacks did the same with BLM I'd want the same.. These cowardly racist wannabe murderers and disruptors of a civil society of inclusion need to be dealt with..And the reason why people think these people's civil rights are being violated is that they forgot the second part of the responsibility of exercising and keeping those rights, by not violating the rights of others...The KKK and BLM has clearly shown to be a violator of other American citizens rights to exist peacefully and to live their lives to the fullest they so desire.. Those are the founding ideas of this nation that I vowed to die defending..
 
The Supreme Court made it clear that schools can disciple kids for what happens outside of school time .
Really? When did that happen? What was the case Timmy? Why didn't you reference it? And where is you link?

Nobody makes more outrageous claims without a single shred of evidence in a post than Timmy. He never gives specifics (for a reason).
 
The Supreme Court made it clear that schools can disciple kids for what happens outside of school time . They have a duty to create a safe atmosphere at school.
Yes folks...little Timmy really is that stupid. If it happened outside of school, it's not posting any threat to the atmosphere at school.
It is when they are a member of a team sport and the cohesion of that team is threatened by the actions of those perpetrators..
 
I don't agree with suspending the students for an off campus activity that was apparently not a crime. Kicking them off the football team, however, seems very appropriate. Nobody wants that representing your school.
Why does that seem appropriate? As you stated, nothing they did was illegal and what they did was on their own time. You still want them punished even though they did nothing wrong. So basically, you want them punished because you don't agree with their views.
 
I don't agree with suspending the students for an off campus activity that was apparently not a crime. Kicking them off the football team, however, seems very appropriate. Nobody wants that representing your school.
Why does that seem appropriate? As you stated, nothing they did was illegal and what they did was on their own time. You still want them punished even though they did nothing wrong. So basically, you want them punished because you don't agree with their views.
What Kaepernick did wasn't illegal yet no one will hire him over it...
 
Good, if any blacks did the same with BLM I'd want the same.. These cowardly racist wannabe murderers and disruptors of a civil society of inclusion need to be dealt with..And the reason why people think these people's civil rights are being violated is that they forgot the second part of the responsibility of exercising and keeping those rights, by not violating the rights of others...The KKK and BLM has clearly shown to be a violator of other American citizens rights to exist peacefully and to live their lives to the fullest they so desire.. Those are the founding ideas of this nation that I vowed to die defending..

When those kids get murdered for wearing mom's pillowcases on their heads, the blood will be on your hands.
 
Good, if any blacks did the same with BLM I'd want the same.. These cowardly racist wannabe murderers and disruptors of a civil society of inclusion need to be dealt with..And the reason why people think these people's civil rights are being violated is that they forgot the second part of the responsibility of exercising and keeping those rights, by not violating the rights of others...The KKK and BLM has clearly shown to be a violator of other American citizens rights to exist peacefully and to live their lives to the fullest they so desire.. Those are the founding ideas of this nation that I vowed to die defending..

When those kids get murdered for wearing mom's pillowcases on their heads, the blood will be on your hands.
No I won't since I would never do such a thing, sorry, do you have anything else intelligent to say on the matter?
 
I don't agree with suspending the students for an off campus activity that was apparently not a crime. Kicking them off the football team, however, seems very appropriate. Nobody wants that representing your school.
Why does that seem appropriate? As you stated, nothing they did was illegal and what they did was on their own time. You still want them punished even though they did nothing wrong. So basically, you want them punished because you don't agree with their views.
What Kaepernick did wasn't illegal yet no one will hire him over it...
Teams are privately owned franchises. As such they have the right to determine who they wish to employ. A school is neither private, nor are the students employees.
 
I don't agree with the kid's message but I'll stand with them for their rights to freedom of speech and expression.

They weren't trying to make a political statement. They were just being rebellious teenagers.

Regardless they are protected by the Constitution
So is Kaepernick yet he can't get a job for displaying his freedom of speech, does that mean that all the people that don't like what he did are fascist left leaning people?

Why do you struggle with understanding the Afro Boy (Kaepernick) situation?
Employees of companies are not protected by the Constitution as you want to believe they are. When an employee is on an employers clock they are representing the employer. Employers decide how they want to be represented and perceived. Clearly the NFL does not want to look like disrespectful anti-American pieces of shits. The NFL does not allow players to push personal agendas while in THEIR uniform.
This is so simple...please stop with the Kaepernick bullshit. He fucked himself...he chose the wrong platform...plus, only half his life matters as he's only half black.
 
I don't agree with the kid's message but I'll stand with them for their rights to freedom of speech and expression.

They weren't trying to make a political statement. They were just being rebellious teenagers.

Regardless they are protected by the Constitution
So is Kaepernick yet he can't get a job for displaying his freedom of speech, does that mean that all the people that don't like what he did are fascist left leaning people?

Why do you struggle with understanding the Afro Boy (Kaepernick) situation?
Employees of companies are not protected by the Constitution as you want to believe they are. When an employee is on an employers clock they are representing the employer. Employers decide how they want to be represented and perceived. Clearly the NFL does not want to look like disrespectful anti-American pieces of shits. The NFL does not allow players to push personal agendas while in THEIR uniform.
This is so simple...please stop with the Kaepernick bullshit. He fucked himself...he chose the wrong platform...plus, only half his life matters as he's only half black.
The kids when playing sports and in general now have to sign an agreement between the school and the student and parents about behavior that is expected of them..When in extracurricular activities there is another signed agreement which covers more intensely about consent of acceptable behavior..What the boys did is innocent to people that actually support the KKK yet the actions even outside the school grounds is unacceptable under the school's policy.. It does sound far fetched but it could cause problems at the school and for the fellows that did it and really I'd like to know why the boys did it in the first place, but the school is bypassing that to cover their ass on the limits on any liability that may be exposed by the students and athletes action.
 
Last edited:
The Supreme Court made it clear that schools can disciple kids for what happens outside of school time .
Really? When did that happen? What was the case Timmy? Why didn't you reference it? And where is you link?

Nobody makes more outrageous claims without a single shred of evidence in a post than Timmy. He never gives specifics (for a reason).

Lmao talk about pulling something out of his ass
 
I don't agree with suspending the students for an off campus activity that was apparently not a crime. Kicking them off the football team, however, seems very appropriate. Nobody wants that representing your school.
Why does that seem appropriate? As you stated, nothing they did was illegal and what they did was on their own time. You still want them punished even though they did nothing wrong. So basically, you want them punished because you don't agree with their views.

Because as athletes, they represent the school. If they competed in the chess club, I'd say the same thing. You don't want racism to be the face of your school and it would be if they were allowed to continue to play.
 
"Fascism is an authoritarian or totalitarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy."
Well, good thing I don't support totalitarian or authoritarianism. Otherwise, I would be a fascist.

The author of that definition bastardized the FUCK out of it to make it sound like capitalist libertarians are fascists.

We need a goddamn war. This bullshit is getting old.
 
"The differences between Communism and Fascism are far from semantic - indeed, those differences are quite real and represent one of the most dramatic struggles of the twentieth century. Far from being at its base similar, Fascism (and its related "isms," chiefly National Socialism) is best understood as a reactionary opposition against Communism. Fascism came into being as a movement bent on destroying the Communists and Socialists, making the locus of collective struggle the nation and/or race rather than socioeconomic class."
Then, fucking....sign me up. I fucking HATE socialists and communists.

This is a good leftist commie strategy. Label us all as Hitler and solidify our gun-toting opposition.
:lol:
 
I don't agree with suspending the students for an off campus activity that was apparently not a crime. Kicking them off the football team, however, seems very appropriate. Nobody wants that representing your school.
Why does that seem appropriate? As you stated, nothing they did was illegal and what they did was on their own time. You still want them punished even though they did nothing wrong. So basically, you want them punished because you don't agree with their views.
What Kaepernick did wasn't illegal yet no one will hire him over it...
Teams are privately owned franchises. As such they have the right to determine who they wish to employ. A school is neither private, nor are the students employees.
How sad is it that you have to explain something so basic and so obvious to the left? The left is astoundingly ignorant. Just as their representatives want them.
 
I don't agree with suspending the students for an off campus activity that was apparently not a crime. Kicking them off the football team, however, seems very appropriate. Nobody wants that representing your school.
Why does that seem appropriate? As you stated, nothing they did was illegal and what they did was on their own time. You still want them punished even though they did nothing wrong. So basically, you want them punished because you don't agree with their views.

Because as athletes, they represent the school. If they competed in the chess club, I'd say the same thing. You don't want racism to be the face of your school and it would be if they were allowed to continue to play.
I'm not accusing you of just calling out football. No matter what the activity - they did nothing wrong. And, their faces are not even being shown, so nobody can even prove that they play a sport. Which means that they are definitely not "the face" of the school.
 

Forum List

Back
Top