Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is no hate for the poor. That is a warped talking point.I got food stamps when I was in college and working part time a few years ago. I wasn't eating lobster and steak. I could barely pay my bills let alone blow my food stamps.
I don't get the war on the poor. Most people getting food stamps are working families that are just trying to make it. Why the hate for the poor?
All of these stories are anecdotal. You are conveniently ignoring the stats in my thread. The stats on SNAP fraud are relatively low, especially since SNAP is not enough for many people.
I'm not ignoring the statistics you posted. I'm saying that the program is so large and mismanaged that fraud is rampant. Then I posted evidence that shows it's rampant.
$5 million in fraud from one person? That should be huge, but it's just a drop in the bucket.
Yeah, ONE person. One person is not evidence of "rampant". This is an extreme case, but it is not representive.
way to build up a false premise.Inspired by Pete's asinine rant on the poor, here is the no-spin facts on SNAP (food stamps). Maybe now you will stop listening to the bullshit propaganda that comes from the Republican party. I put what I consider to be the most important facts in bold, but I do encourage you to read all of it.
SNAP (Food Stamps): Facts, Myths and Realities
(Their sources are straight from government data)
Tell Me then, oh purveyor of government propaganda, why is it that we face a hunger issue in this country but are the fattest fuckers on the planet?
Children in poverty and who have parents accepting food stamps seem to have the most fat kids.
Any clue as to why that is? Because I know why, but I doubt you'd believe it because you will only accept the progressive view point.
We are the fattest country because 15% of us eat fast food on a DAILY basis. Fast food is cheap. Healthy food is not.
Seem to have the fattest kids? You pulled that out of your ass.
This isn't a "progressive viewpoint". These are facts. Get used to it.
can you buy lobster with snap?
You can, but when you have to provide food all Month most wouldn't buy it.
It's like you guys assume all these people with little income and families to feed are just saying fuck it lets starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight.
While others live in the real world, and realize most are not eating like kings.
Well, they may or may not say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight," but they do say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can go to the nudie bar and get liquored up"...
Welfare Recipients Spending Taxpayer Dollars at Strip Clubs, Liquor Stores | Blog | The Willis Report with Gerri Willis | Fox Business
way to build up a false premise.Inspired by Pete's asinine rant on the poor, here is the no-spin facts on SNAP (food stamps). Maybe now you will stop listening to the bullshit propaganda that comes from the Republican party. I put what I consider to be the most important facts in bold, but I do encourage you to read all of it.
SNAP (Food Stamps): Facts, Myths and Realities
(Their sources are straight from government data)
Tell Me then, oh purveyor of government propaganda, why is it that we face a hunger issue in this country but are the fattest fuckers on the planet?
Children in poverty and who have parents accepting food stamps seem to have the most fat kids.
Any clue as to why that is? Because I know why, but I doubt you'd believe it because you will only accept the progressive view point.
We are the fattest country because 15% of us eat fast food on a DAILY basis. Fast food is cheap. Healthy food is not.
Seem to have the fattest kids? You pulled that out of your ass.
This isn't a "progressive viewpoint". These are facts. Get used to it.
It is propaganda, understand that. This is what you are peddling.way to build up a false premise.Inspired by Pete's asinine rant on the poor, here is the no-spin facts on SNAP (food stamps). Maybe now you will stop listening to the bullshit propaganda that comes from the Republican party. I put what I consider to be the most important facts in bold, but I do encourage you to read all of it.
SNAP (Food Stamps): Facts, Myths and Realities
(Their sources are straight from government data)
Tell Me then, oh purveyor of government propaganda, why is it that we face a hunger issue in this country but are the fattest fuckers on the planet?
Children in poverty and who have parents accepting food stamps seem to have the most fat kids.
Any clue as to why that is? Because I know why, but I doubt you'd believe it because you will only accept the progressive view point.
We are the fattest country because 15% of us eat fast food on a DAILY basis. Fast food is cheap. Healthy food is not.
Seem to have the fattest kids? You pulled that out of your ass.
This isn't a "progressive viewpoint". These are facts. Get used to it.
You can, but when you have to provide food all Month most wouldn't buy it.
It's like you guys assume all these people with little income and families to feed are just saying fuck it lets starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight.
While others live in the real world, and realize most are not eating like kings.
Well, they may or may not say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight," but they do say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can go to the nudie bar and get liquored up"...
Welfare Recipients Spending Taxpayer Dollars at Strip Clubs, Liquor Stores | Blog | The Willis Report with Gerri Willis | Fox Business
You can't use food stamps at a strip club. Next.
You should have read the article before you blurted out something stupid...You can, but when you have to provide food all Month most wouldn't buy it.
It's like you guys assume all these people with little income and families to feed are just saying fuck it lets starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight.
While others live in the real world, and realize most are not eating like kings.
Well, they may or may not say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight," but they do say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can go to the nudie bar and get liquored up"...
Welfare Recipients Spending Taxpayer Dollars at Strip Clubs, Liquor Stores | Blog | The Willis Report with Gerri Willis | Fox Business
You can't use food stamps at a strip club. Next.
Like this one- The Club Eleven. Cops have been cracking down on this Bronx club for years. Last summer, five men were stabbed there, and two others were shot outside after bouncers broke up the party with pepper spray at 4 A.M. Welfare recipients were able to make cash withdrawals from the food stamp cards at the strip club's EBT machine.
Sorry, but you're the joke here, not the facts, and sorry it shoots holes in your BS.You can, but when you have to provide food all Month most wouldn't buy it.
It's like you guys assume all these people with little income and families to feed are just saying fuck it lets starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight.
While others live in the real world, and realize most are not eating like kings.
Well, they may or may not say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can have lobster tonight," but they do say "fuck it, let's starve the rest of the month so we can go to the nudie bar and get liquored up"...
Welfare Recipients Spending Taxpayer Dollars at Strip Clubs, Liquor Stores | Blog | The Willis Report with Gerri Willis | Fox Business
Lol this story is a complete joke. It never actually says how much money, or how many welfare recipients were actually spending money at these strip clubs. All it says is the most amount of money a family gets from benefits in general which is largely unrelated to the story!
Of course I can expect this kind of bullshit from Fox News.
I'm not ignoring the statistics you posted. I'm saying that the program is so large and mismanaged that fraud is rampant. Then I posted evidence that shows it's rampant.
$5 million in fraud from one person? That should be huge, but it's just a drop in the bucket.
Yeah, ONE person. One person is not evidence of "rampant". This is an extreme case, but it is not representive.
One person who can commit $5 million in fraud from one store is most certainly evidence or rampant corruption. That one person could steal that much from the program means that there are completely inadequate controls.
$2.5 Billion in 2010
Find me an anecdotal story where someone with SNAP bought caviar, then we'll talk.
how about lobsters and high end steaks.... same idea.... luxury foods....
so lets talk shall we....
how about Chantalle mushrooms?
snopes.com: Food Stamps Steak Receipt
Like i said, you can buy those items, but anyone that does is a moron. Therefore, when it happens, it rare.
Man you people are desperate to hold onto your hollow bigotry.
Underpaid?Yeah, ONE person. One person is not evidence of "rampant". This is an extreme case, but it is not representive.
One person who can commit $5 million in fraud from one store is most certainly evidence or rampant corruption. That one person could steal that much from the program means that there are completely inadequate controls.
$2.5 Billion in 2010
2.5 billion out of 64.7 billion? This article of course conveniently ignores how much money a welfare recipient receives. No one ever said fraud wasnt a problem. It is however a minor one. In fact, that 2.5 billion includes more than just people being dishonest. It includes social work error.
How about the 1/5 recipients who are being underpaid?
This article is complete spin. Of course it did come from a conservative source.
Yeah, ONE person. One person is not evidence of "rampant". This is an extreme case, but it is not representive.
One person who can commit $5 million in fraud from one store is most certainly evidence or rampant corruption. That one person could steal that much from the program means that there are completely inadequate controls.
$2.5 Billion in 2010
2.5 billion out of 64.7 billion? This article of course conveniently ignores how much money a welfare recipient receives. No one ever said fraud wasnt a problem. It is however a minor one. In fact, that 2.5 billion includes more than just people being dishonest. It includes social work error.
How about the 1/5 recipients who are being underpaid?
This article is complete spin. Of course it did come from a conservative source.
Or learn how to game the system.
KCTV5 food stamp fraud investigation leads to arrest - KCTV5
Dollar store owner charged with allowing more than $5M in fraudulent food stamp purchases | NJ.com
Farmington couple arrested on suspicion of food stamp fraud - Farmington Daily Times
Arrests made in EBT fraud scheme | HeraldTribune.com
Store owners arrested on food-stamp fraud charges | Volusia County News - WESH Home
http://www.tallahassee.com/article/20130429/NEWS01/130429008/Update-Three-arrested-food-stamp-fraud
All of these stories are anecdotal. You are conveniently ignoring the stats in my thread. The stats on SNAP fraud are relatively low, especially since SNAP is not enough for many people.
I'm not ignoring the statistics you posted. I'm saying that the program is so large and mismanaged that fraud is rampant. Then I posted evidence that shows it's rampant.
$5 million in fraud from one person? That should be huge, but it's just a drop in the bucket.
Nobody asked if it is realistic...it's possible. There is nothing to prevent anyone who has SNAP benefits from buying caviar with them.
Are you really this stupid? Tell you what, find me a case where someone bought caviar with SNAP funding. Otherwise, shut up.
Caviar & food stamps ? Brooklyn Daily
Steak and Lobster too:
snopes.com: Food Stamps Steak Receipt
It is propaganda, understand that. This is what you are peddling.way to build up a false premise.
Tell Me then, oh purveyor of government propaganda, why is it that we face a hunger issue in this country but are the fattest fuckers on the planet?
Children in poverty and who have parents accepting food stamps seem to have the most fat kids.
Any clue as to why that is? Because I know why, but I doubt you'd believe it because you will only accept the progressive view point.
We are the fattest country because 15% of us eat fast food on a DAILY basis. Fast food is cheap. Healthy food is not.
Seem to have the fattest kids? You pulled that out of your ass.
This isn't a "progressive viewpoint". These are facts. Get used to it.
Now, as to your reply. No one begrudges people food stamps. However, with largess comes a set of expectations. People using food stamps for fast food is one of the things wrong with the program. Buying non-nutritious, calorie dense foods that have no nutritional value is another. Perhaps you should learn a little bit about nutrition, eating habits and proper shopping.
The moron Doomblerg wanted to take away 32 oz sugar drinks from adults who could pay for it, but ignores the poor purchase habits of people who use government handouts as a means of feeding themselves and then.....and THEN....they want to pass laws on those of us who CAN support our families limiting OUR freedoms while allowing the food stamp people to continue to sell food stamps for drugs and cigarettes, purchase unhealthy foods, and abuse the system.
Now, I know you don't think any of that happens, ANYWHERE, but the truth is, I can see this abuse on a daily basis. I have seen this abuse in 7 states and I have no doubt that I can find it in the other 43, (50 for you progressives).
Don't give Me the hunger meme.....Kids that are going hungry or have to rely upon schools to feed them need to be taken away from parents who are using their government handouts for anything OTHER than feeding their kids.
And don't even get Me started on adults who don't have the fucking pride to work multiple jobs to support the offspring they bring into this world.
You progressives just dismiss it and make excuses for people who can barely get by having more and more kids and then call us heartless when we say enough, we are not going to take ALL of your responsibility for YOUR life.
way to build up a false premise.Inspired by Pete's asinine rant on the poor, here is the no-spin facts on SNAP (food stamps). Maybe now you will stop listening to the bullshit propaganda that comes from the Republican party. I put what I consider to be the most important facts in bold, but I do encourage you to read all of it.
SNAP (Food Stamps): Facts, Myths and RealitiesSNAP is targeted at the most vulnerable.
76% of SNAP households included a child, an elderly person, or a disabled person. These vulnerable households receive 83% of all SNAP benefits.
SNAP eligibility is limited to households with gross income of no more than 130% of the federal poverty guideline, but the majority of households have income well below the maximum: 83% of SNAP households have gross income at or below 100% of the poverty guideline ($19,530 for a family of 3 in 2013), and these households receive about 91% of all benefits. 61% of SNAP households have gross income at or below 75% of the poverty guideline ($14,648 for a family of 3 in 2013).[ii]
The average SNAP household has a gross monthly income of $744; net monthly income of $338 after the standard deduction and, for certain households, deductions for child care, medical expenses, and shelter costs; and countable resources of $331, such as a bank account.[iii]
SNAP is responsive to changes in need, providing needed food assistance as families fall into economic hardship and then transitioning away as their financial situation stabilizes.
SNAP participation historically follows unemployment with a slight lag. SNAP participation grew during the recession, responding quickly and effectively to increased need. As the number of unemployed people increased by 94% from 2007 to 2011, SNAP responded with a 70% increase in participation over the same period. [iv]
As the economy recovers and people go back to work, SNAP participation and program costs, too, can be expected to decline. Unemployment has begun to slowly fall, and SNAP participation growth has flattened out. The Congressional Budget Office projects SNAP participation to begin declining in 2015, with both unemployment and SNAP participation returning to near pre-recession levels by 2022.[v]
SNAP has a strong record of program integrity.
SNAP error rates declined by 57% since FY2000, from 8.91% in FY2000 to a record low of 3.80% in FY2011.[vi] The accuracy rate of 96.2% (FY2011) is an all-time program high and is considerably higher than other major benefit programs, for example Medicare fee-for-service (91.5%) or Medicare Advantage Part C (88.6%). [vii]
Two-thirds of all SNAP payment errors are a result of caseworker error. Nearly one-fifth are underpayments, which occur when eligible participants receive less in benefits than they are eligible to receive.[viii]
The national rate of food stamp trafficking declined from about 3.8 cents per dollar of benefits redeemed in 1993 to about 1.0 cent per dollar during the years 2006 to 2008.[ix] As you may have read in local news, USDA is aggressively fighting trafficking, but while there are individual cases of program abuse, for every one instance of fraud, there are hundreds of stories of heartbreaking need.
The need for food assistance is already greater than SNAP can fill.
SNAP benefits dont last most participants the whole month. 90% of SNAP benefits are redeemed by the third week of the month, and 58% of food bank clients currently receiving SNAP benefits turn to food banks for assistance at least 6 months out of the year.[x]
The average monthly SNAP benefit per person is $133.85, or less than $1.50 per person, per meal. [xi]
Only 55% of food insecure individuals are income-eligible for SNAP, and 29% are not income-eligible for any federal food assistance.[xii]
Categorical Eligibility
Categorical eligibility allows many people to automatically enroll in SNAP who wouldnt otherwise qualify for the program.
Categorical eligibility does not allow households to enroll automatically; they must still apply through the regular SNAP application process, which has rigorous procedures for documenting applicants income, citizenship, work status, and other circumstances.
Categorical eligibility allows states the option of aligning SNAP eligibility rules for gross income and asset limits with TANF to reduce administrative costs and simplify the eligibility determination process. While three-fourths of SNAP households were categorically eligible, almost all would also have been eligible for SNAP under standard rules.[xiii]
While a small number of households would not have met gross income and asset eligibility rules without categorical eligibility, SNAP families are still among the poorest households:
The average SNAP household has a gross monthly income of $744 and net monthly income of $338.[xiv]
SNAP rules limit eligibility to households with gross income under 130% of poverty and net income at or below 100% of poverty. While categorical eligibility allows states to set a higher gross income limit, only 1.5% of SNAP households in 2010 had monthly net income above 150% of the poverty line, so the policy has not made SNAP available to large numbers of households with incomes above the federal gross income limit of 130% of poverty.[xv]
SNAP rules limit eligibility to households with assets of no more than $2000 ($3250 for households with a senior or disabled member). The average SNAP household still has assets of only $331.[xvi] Additionally, the SNAP asset limit of $2,000 has not been adjusted for inflation in 25 years and has fallen by 48% in real terms since 1986.[xvii]
Categorical eligibility has dramatically increased program participation.
The dramatic increase in SNAP participation and costs is a result of the recession, not categorical eligibility. Our nation has seen the highest unemployment rates in nearly 30 years.
The dramatic increase in SNAP participation and costs is a result of the recession, not categorical eligibility. Our nation has seen the highest unemployment rates in nearly 30 years.
SNAP participation historically follows unemployment with a slight lag. SNAP participation grew during the recession, responding quickly and effectively to increased need. As the number of unemployed people increased by 94% from 2007 to 2011, SNAP responded with a 70% increase in participation over the same period. [xviii]
As the economy recovers and people go back to work, SNAP participation and program costs, too, can be expected to decline. Unemployment has begun to slowly fall, and SNAP participation growth has flattened out. The Congressional Budget Office projects SNAP participation to begin declining in 2015, with both unemployment and SNAP participation returning to near pre-recession levels by 2022.[xix]
Eliminating categorical eligibility would significantly reduce costs.
Eliminating categorical eligibility would achieve savings by causing about 2-3 million low-income people currently enrolled in SNAP to lose their benefits.[xx] Many more families newly applying for assistance would have their benefit issuance delayed because of the increased complexity of applying and additional processing time required. This human cost is too high a price to pay with so many families struggling to get by in this economy.
In addition to the loss of needed food assistance for struggling families, this savings would come at the expense of increased administrative costs. Eliminating the streamlined application process that categorical eligibility allows would require states to allocate staff time to duplicate enrollment procedures and incur the cost of modifying their computer systems, reprinting applications and manuals, and retraining staff.
Program Growth
Generous eligibility rules and program fraud and abuse have caused participation in SNAP to balloon, sharply driving up the cost of the program when the nation can least afford it.
The dramatic increase in SNAP participation and costs is a result of the recession, not categorical eligibility. Our nation has seen the highest unemployment rates in nearly 30 years.
SNAP participation historically follows unemployment with a slight lag. SNAP participation grew during the recession, responding quickly and effectively to increased need. As the number of unemployed people increased by 94% from 2007 to 2011, SNAP responded with a 70% increase in participation over the same period. [xxi]
As the economy recovers and people go back to work, SNAP participation and program costs, too, can be expected to decline. Unemployment has begun to slowly fall, and SNAP participation growth has flattened out. The Congressional Budget Office projects SNAP participation to begin declining in 2015, with both unemployment and SNAP participation returning to near pre-recession levels by 2022.[xxii]
(Their sources are straight from government data)
Tell Me then, oh purveyor of government propaganda, why is it that we face a hunger issue in this country but are the fattest fuckers on the planet?
Children in poverty and who have parents accepting food stamps seem to have the most fat kids.
Any clue as to why that is? Because I know why, but I doubt you'd believe it because you will only accept the progressive view point.
All of these stories are anecdotal. You are conveniently ignoring the stats in my thread. The stats on SNAP fraud are relatively low, especially since SNAP is not enough for many people.
I'm not ignoring the statistics you posted. I'm saying that the program is so large and mismanaged that fraud is rampant. Then I posted evidence that shows it's rampant.
$5 million in fraud from one person? That should be huge, but it's just a drop in the bucket.
Yeah, ONE person. One person is not evidence of "rampant". This is an extreme case, but it is not representive.
I got food stamps when I was in college and working part time a few years ago. I wasn't eating lobster and steak. I could barely pay my bills let alone blow my food stamps.
I don't get the war on the poor. Most people getting food stamps are working families that are just trying to make it. Why the hate for the poor?
