- Mar 9, 2011
- 70,190
- 83,957
- 3,635
The United States is considered a country where the level of corruption is low. This means that this is not Olligarchy yet.
No, we aren't an oligarchy yet. As opposed to.....dare I say it?
Russia!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The United States is considered a country where the level of corruption is low. This means that this is not Olligarchy yet.
Considered by which naive section of the populace?The United States is considered a country where the level of corruption is low. This means that this is not Olligarchy yet.
Join the nearest local political club of your party and cry.The United States is considered a country where the level of corruption is low. This means that this is not Olligarchy yet.
If you violated the rules of the road in the United States, can you negotiate with the traffic inspector so that they do not draw up a report by offering them $ 10?Considered by which naive section of the populace?
You sound like If you knew how corrupt politicians and city departments were you would commit suicide.If you violated the rules of the road in the United States, can you negotiate with the traffic inspector so that they do not draw up a report by offering them $ 10?
Or, for example, how often do they take entrance exams for money in the USA?
I think that such things in the US are not widespread. This in itself indicates a low level of corruption.
You sound like If you knew how corrupt politicians and city departments were you would commit suicide.
Because it's in that precious constitution you all bellow about when you think some one broke the law.Congress is a legacy of the Roman Republic. The House of Representatives represented the interests of the plebeians. But since all citizens now have equal rights, the lower house has lost its meaning. Why is it needed?
I don't think Trump is right.Because it's in that precious constitution you all bellow about when you think some one broke the law.
What you really mean is You are anticipating a Republican win and rightly so, so then you could abolish the reps so you could install a dictatorship just like trump wanted and you supported.
Are you so dumb you think I couldn't see through that?
How can you call yourself an American and belch democracy and simultaneously want to install fascism?
Do you think with your arse or something? Youre paranoid about abolishing anything which could cause republicans to lose anything.
I already knew that but I didn't expect anyone to be so stupid to propose it.
You fascist POS.
Mooches, illegals, the dead, criminals deserve no representation and never were intended such.We still are a country mostly of commoners, but in such large number deserving of representation and as another check and balance. There is that thing about it being in the constitution, also. Guess we'll keep it.
I agree on the illegals, the dead, the criminals, and I would put most of the x-convicts back on that list. The poor still need representation as I have known some that worked multiple low-end, part-time jobs and still could not get by without help. Yes, more often than no, because of their decisions made. They don't deserve preference, though.Mooches, illegals, the dead, criminals deserve no representation and never were intended such.
The dictatorship is having only one house of Congress which can be manipulated by the president. Trump threated senators who wanted to vote against him during his first impeachment.I don't think Trump is right.
What "dictatorship" are you talking about, isn't the Senate an elected?
Does the President have power over the Senate? Or are you just lying?The dictatorship is having only one house of Congress which can be manipulated by the president. Trump threated senators who wanted to vote against him during his first impeachment.
Thats an dictatorship.
The president can only approve/reject (veto) legislation. The presidential veto can be over ridden with a 2/3 vote of both houses of congress. The president does not have power over congress.Does the President have power over the Senate? Or are you just lying?
Yes, and the opposite is true: the President, as head of the executive branch, executes the laws of Parliament. That is, he is subject to Parliament.The president can only approve/reject (veto) legislation. The presidential veto can be over ridden with a 2/3 vote of both houses of congress. The president does not have power over congress.
In the UK, the commons is checked by the Lords. In the US, is the Senate checked by the House?Senate Is enough