The end of the radical left and the Barryworshipers?

[Yurt]

Yea....yea..

And your world beating republican candidate for 2012 is ????

stupid....obama wasn't considered as a candidate at this time

 

[rightwinger]

Yea....yea..

And your world beating republican candidate for 2012 is ????

stupid....obama wasn't considered as a candidate at this time

Obama had given an impressive speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention. He was recognized as an up and comer.

Who is the next republican up and comer?

Maybe you should check with Boss Limbaugh before you answer

 

[Oddball]

Yea....yea..

And your world beating republican candidate for 2012 is ????

stupid....obama wasn't considered as a candidate at this time

Obama had given an impressive speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention. He was recognized as an up and comer.

Who is the next republican up and comer?

Maybe you should check with Boss Limbaugh before you answer

Again...See #27.

After all, that rationale was, to great extent, a large part of why Barry Obolshevik was elected to begin with.

 

[BolshevikHunter]

stupid....obama wasn't considered as a candidate at this time

Obama had given an impressive speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention. He was recognized as an up and comer.

Who is the next republican up and comer?

Maybe you should check with Boss Limbaugh before you answer

Again...See #27.

After all, that rationale was, to great extent, a large part of why Barry Obolshevik was elected to begin with.

Does this cat really think that you listen to Boss Limbaugh? LOL!!! ~BH

 

[rightwinger]

stupid....obama wasn't considered as a candidate at this time

Obama had given an impressive speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention. He was recognized as an up and comer.

Who is the next republican up and comer?

Maybe you should check with Boss Limbaugh before you answer

Again...See #27.

After all, that rationale was, to great extent, a large part of why Barry Obolshevik was elected to begin with.

And the next republican contender is???????



#27 !


I can see why the Democrats are worried

 

[rightwinger]

I got a candidate for you guys..

Tommy Tancredo!

We know how he sends fear into the hearts of liberals

 

[Oddball]

And the next republican contender is???????



#27 !


I can see why the Democrats are worried

The point is that there doesn't have to be one.

All there needs to be is the illusion of "change".

He who lives by the illusion, dies by the illusion.

 

[rightwinger]

And the next republican contender is???????



#27 !


I can see why the Democrats are worried

The point is that there doesn't have to be one.

All there needs to be is the illusion of "change".

He who lives by the illusion, dies by the illusion.

Ohhhh....I get it now


Its so easy



The next republican presidential candidate.....




David Blaine

 

[Yurt]

Yea....yea..

And your world beating republican candidate for 2012 is ????

stupid....obama wasn't considered as a candidate at this time

Obama had given an impressive speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention. He was recognized as an up and comer.

Who is the next republican up and comer?

Maybe you should check with Boss Limbaugh before you answer

he wasn't seriously considered as the next candidate then, nice try

i love you hacks that call limbaugh the boss.....it shows how stupid you really are....and how jealous you are

 

[Oddball]

And the next republican contender is???????



#27 !


I can see why the Democrats are worried

The point is that there doesn't have to be one.

All there needs to be is the illusion of "change".

He who lives by the illusion, dies by the illusion.

Ohhhh....I get it now


Its so easy



The next republican presidential candidate.....




David Blaine

Could be.

Never sell short the revulsion brought about by a shitty incumbent.

 

[Yurt]

The race tighted considerably ...

Check it:

RealClearPolitics - Election 2009 - New Jersey Governor - Corzine vs. Christie

As you can see Corzine was pretty much effed from the beginning.

even Obama couldn't save him.

From what I understand Corzine was a terrible governor and deserved to get the axe.

so why did obama expend so much political capital on him....

 

[Oddball]

From what I understand Corzine was a terrible governor and deserved to get the axe.

so why did obama expend so much political capital on him....

Inquiring minds want to know!

 

[elvis]

even Obama couldn't save him.

From what I understand Corzine was a terrible governor and deserved to get the axe.

so why did obama expend so much political capital on him....

what did he have to lose?

 

[Yurt]

From what I understand Corzine was a terrible governor and deserved to get the axe.

so why did obama expend so much political capital on him....

what did he have to lose?

star power, vote power....

 

[rightwinger]

Could be.

Never sell short the revulsion brought about by a shitty incumbent.

Oh...absolutely

Your quandry is that you must do two things

1. Convince the voting public that President Obama is a "shitty incumbent". Obama still holds a 54% approval rating. The economy that was on the verge of collapse is recovering. Healthcare will pass. Obama will still be extremely popular in 2012

2. Convince the voting public that your guy is better than that "shitty incumbent". Sorry Dude, but even you know the republicans are really weak in this department. No candidates, no message....no money

 

[Oddball]

Actual Corzine...or is that Obama...billboards:

So, who went "all in" here?

 

[Oddball]

Could be.

Never sell short the revulsion brought about by a shitty incumbent.

Oh...absolutely

Your quandry is that you must do two things

1. Convince the voting public that President Obama is a "shitty incumbent". Obama still holds a 54% approval rating. The economy that was on the verge of collapse is recovering. Healthcare will pass. Obama will still be extremely popular in 2012

2. Convince the voting public that your guy is better than that "shitty incumbent". Sorry Dude, but even you know the republicans are really weak in this department. No candidates, no message....no money

I have no quandary.

Unless the GOP nominates someone with the last name of Paul in '12, I'll continue to vote LP.

Ignore history at your on peril, bub.

 

[Oscar Wao]

Could be.

Never sell short the revulsion brought about by a shitty incumbent.

Oh...absolutely

Your quandry is that you must do two things

1. Convince the voting public that President Obama is a "shitty incumbent". Obama still holds a 54% approval rating. The economy that was on the verge of collapse is recovering. Healthcare will pass. Obama will still be extremely popular in 2012

2. Convince the voting public that your guy is better than that "shitty incumbent". Sorry Dude, but even you know the republicans are really weak in this department. No candidates, no message....no money

I have no quandary.

Unless the GOP nominates someone with the last name of Paul in '12, I'll continue to vote LP.

Ignore history at your on peril, bub.

You forgot Johnson, the young, hip, RP with better speaking skills and appeal.

 

[elvis]

Oh...absolutely

Your quandry is that you must do two things

1. Convince the voting public that President Obama is a "shitty incumbent". Obama still holds a 54% approval rating. The economy that was on the verge of collapse is recovering. Healthcare will pass. Obama will still be extremely popular in 2012

2. Convince the voting public that your guy is better than that "shitty incumbent". Sorry Dude, but even you know the republicans are really weak in this department. No candidates, no message....no money

I have no quandary.

Unless the GOP nominates someone with the last name of Paul in '12, I'll continue to vote LP.

Ignore history at your on peril, bub.

You forgot Johnson, the young, hip, RP with better speaking skills and appeal.

is he a real libertarian, or is he another barr?

 

[Oscar Wao]

I have no quandary.

Unless the GOP nominates someone with the last name of Paul in '12, I'll continue to vote LP.

Ignore history at your on peril, bub.

You forgot Johnson, the young, hip, RP with better speaking skills and appeal.

is he a real libertarian, or is he another barr?

He seems to be a genuine guy.

I don't think a "Barr" type would be so open about his believing in legalizing drugs, keeping somewhat of a "pro-choice" view on abortion, being tolerant of alternative lifestyles, vetoing almost every bill ever, etc.